Top
Best
New

Posted by vismit2000 4 hours ago

UTF-8000: Unlimited UTF-8(utf-8000.jb2170.com)
53 points | 31 commentspage 2
jibal 2 hours ago|
The letter from Ken Thompson is spot on:

"your first 2 extensions (5 and 6 bytes) were clearly envisioned. the standard (up to 4 bytes) was created to cover the size of unicode. i thought any more description would be a waste of paper. i think your extension from 7 to 8 bytes is a little hoaky. i requires reading the whole string rather than "knowing" the number of follow on bytes. so, i think the only thing new is the 7 byte version.

i appreciate the mail, but i really dont think it is useful. it is like replacing ipv6 with ipv50."

mrlonglong 2 hours ago||
I love it.

Some day we'll need this when we finally realise we are not alone in the universe. Alien glyphs ftw.

flohofwoe 2 hours ago||
Phew, and I was worried that we'd be running out of UNICODE space for new emojis ;)
beeforpork 1 hour ago||
It would be nice if the first paragraph gave a motivation for this. Why did you start this?

I mean, I can derive from the text that this can encode arbitrarily large integers. So what? What's the point? I also understand that this is for fun.

Grimeton 2 hours ago||
More like WTF-8.

https://xkcd.com/1953/

Sharlin 2 hours ago|
No, WTF-8 is its own encoding: https://wtf-8.codeberg.page/
snvzz 2 hours ago|
No project is ever safe from complicators.

This is why we need the KISS enforcers.

flohofwoe 2 hours ago|
But the nice thing about UTF-8 is that this proposal isn't really a "complication", but a minimal and natural extension of the original idea to allow more than one lead byte.