Top
Best
New

Posted by paimapi 1 day ago

Bill to Ban Private Equity from Owning Medical Practices(truthout.org)
497 points | 369 commentspage 3
burnt-resistor 1 day ago|
PE buys up hospitals to gut them, make them less capable, and cheaper to run.

Then, they buy up air ambulance services to unnecessarily fly patients to other hospitals they own because it's more profitable at the expense of care delays and worse outcomes. Meanwhile, patients and their families are stuck with exorbitant air ambulance bills $20k-60k.

mmooss 1 day ago||
If for-profit healthcare is allowed then it could be regulated like banking, with requirements to prevent failure (including requirements for financial health), and if there is failure, to ensure customers are protected and provide for continuity.

Like banks, failure of a healthcare institution can be destructive for its customers and the community. If a bank goes under, especially a significant one for the community, regulators see that it's acquired by a surviving institution - often with only a weekend of downtime.

Zeetah 1 day ago||
Another area private equity is taking advantage of is college housing. They have driven tents through the roof (the pun is an unintended bonus).
thrance 1 day ago||
Nothing a few bills slipped to republican and "moderate" democratic senators won't fix!
jimbob45 1 day ago||
Bi…cameral legislation?
defterGoose 1 day ago||
...meaning both houses of Congress.
jimbob45 1 day ago||
As opposed to the many famous cases of unicameral American legislation?
gs17 1 day ago||
Yes, a lot of bills are introduced in one chamber and die in that same chamber. This case is referring to it being introduced by "Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), along with Representatives Val Hoyle (D-Ore.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), and Suhas Subramanyam (D-Va.)", presumably there's a companion bill for the house, since the links seem to only have the Senate version.
exabrial 1 day ago||
This is dumb. Just enforce the existing antitrust laws. Yeah sorry Apple Google, this is going to hurt
marsven_422 1 day ago||
[dead]
dd8601fn 1 day ago||
How about just “cannot sell for 20 years”?

The usual complaint is going full extractive mode, desperately squeezing profit and selling inside 3-7 years.

So, yeah, we can keep private investment. But they're fucking stuck with it, trying to maintain a healthy business for 20 years.

Gustomaximus 1 day ago||
I feel it would be good to bring in (or back) compulsory partnership structures for key professional businesses like GPs, dentists, pharmacies, vets and accountants.

The PE buy-up of these core local businesses isn't great for society generally, service delivery and the existence of a middle class.

The other thing I feel gov should do is force a separation of distributors and point of sale, with rules that allow smaller business to buy at the same pricing as larger.

People seem to forget a key requirement of capitalism is for government to create a level playing field for business. I cant see a better way to do this, and I suspect it would be very beneficial to the bulk of society if gov made some changes down this line.

naveen99 1 day ago|
I wonder if ai can help doctors reclaim their practices, as the bureaucracy of dealing with insurance may become easier. Administrative overhead must be cheaper with ai. It was the main reason for consolidation and giving up management to hospitals and private equity.
nradov 1 day ago||
AI can help doctors with the administrative side but insurance companies are also deploying AI. We're seeing an escalating arms race with provider AIs battling against payer AIs.

That's only one part of economies of scale. The technical and legal compliance costs for running a provider organization are also killing small practices. And provider organizations also consolidate in order to gain power for negotiating rates with commercial insurers.

Buttons840 1 day ago||
I think it's more likely AI will cause disruption by ruthlessly optimizing on behalf of individuals.

Private Equity can afford to have people sitting around all day figuring out tricks and optimizations to save a buck here and there, and this is a power imbalance because the plebs care about things like spending time with their family, and they don't spend all their time trying to save a buck.

Maybe one day the AIs will optimize for us while we spend time with our families. And if a new vet opens that costs $15 less, the AI will route customers to the new business, driving prices down, until we reach 0 profit margin across all industries.

There's probably like a 10 trillion dollar incentive to not allow AI to truly work on behalf of individuals though, so we'll see what happens. For instance, just look at the ad industry alone; if AIs are shopping truly on behalf of individuals, and this becomes wide spread, then the ad industry is just gone.

naveen99 1 day ago||
Optimization of medical care in usa is mostly limited by regulation and fear of lawsuits. Neither of which is going away. You can always get cheaper care in other parts of the world.

Vets see animals, not humans.

More comments...