Top
Best
New

Posted by meetpateltech 10 hours ago

Grok 4.7(x.ai)
492 points | 411 commentspage 6
mempko 6 hours ago|
[flagged]
blactuary 5 hours ago||
And poisoning Memphis. So disappointing that no one has principles anymore
13415 5 hours ago|||
There is no need to use it anyway, it's always been uninteresting in terms of performance. However, for me the red flag was when Musk admitted he will personally interfere in its training and prompts to make it more of a propaganda tool. I'm interested in science and reality, not in the political delusions of elderly drug addicts.
Shiggy_ 6 hours ago|||
[flagged]
DaSHacka 6 hours ago||
[flagged]
felixgallo 8 hours ago||
[flagged]
knicholes 8 hours ago||
How do I obtain this morality build?
inferniac 8 hours ago||
[flagged]
oulipo 7 hours ago||
We do believe that Musk is fascist
Vaslo 7 hours ago||
No, we don't
myko 5 hours ago||
[flagged]
TylerJaacks 8 hours ago||
[flagged]
mavamaarten 8 hours ago||
Yeah. I'm actively avoiding giving mr far right any $$
786562354238 8 hours ago|||
Did you come up with that by yourself?
TuxSH 8 hours ago||
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/mechahitler-grok
mrtesthah 8 hours ago||
Everyone should be clear that this is what they’re cheering on when they celebrate a Grok performance win. A technology is no longer neutral when wielded by a self-proclaimed white supremacist whose actions have killed over a million black and brown people, mostly children and babies.
oulipo 7 hours ago||
Exactly. And it's DEEPLY DISTURBING that all comments on HN that point out that X is pro-nazi no longer has an upvote button
johnnyApplePRNG 6 hours ago||
[flagged]
eleventen 8 hours ago||
[flagged]
big_toast 8 hours ago||
Thank you for your perspective and I agree as repetitive as it is, I hope hn can continue to surface disagreement/substantial views on a topic.

These comments don't stay up much anymore and I can't tell if it's structural to the forum (flag weight + statistical mechanics of votes + guidelines) or if it's the userbase sentiment.

oulipo 7 hours ago||
Except for now HN doesn't do that. Every single comment that points the issue with Grok being built by a pro-fascist team is being "locked" so that they can't be upvoted
eleventen 7 hours ago||
For what it's worth, I've watched the vote fight on my comment swing back and fourth over the last hour. It got flagged, unflagged, and flagged again. It appears to now be locked and dead.

But I think it represents real malaise in the community. It's not a moderator plot, people here really just don't care and might even support this.

We really are in the minority of opinion for giving a damn about liberal democracy.

big_toast 7 hours ago|||
I think I was trying to bring up the mechanics of the forum as another reason.

Between the guidelines + user thoughts (e.g. repetition, low novelty/new info), there's other reasons these types of replies might end up dead.

I am worried that it leads to people self selecting to other forums biasing the remaining userbase vote/vouch/flag distributions. In an exit vs voice situation, the voice kinda dies out. Then we end up other-izing people and homogenizing our communities.

But I concede it's also possible that the minority opinion issue could be the core driving force.

hdhdjdif 7 hours ago|||
dilate
jesse_dot_id 8 hours ago|||
Yeah, not touching xAI for several glaring reasons. I share your confusion.
drop_star 8 hours ago|||
I wont touch his products and neither will my organization
ForrestN 8 hours ago|||
I completely agree. But this has been true for many years. This sort of head in the sand compartmentalization seems to be a core feature of the culture here.
moolcool 8 hours ago||
It’s either compartmentalization, or something else
vb-8448 8 hours ago|||
Definitely not a musk fan, but what exact is your point? Other big labs aren't innocent little virgins.
eleventen 8 hours ago|||
I think I already made my point, but I'll make it again.

Nobody both worked and spent their money to get Trump elected like Musk. 300 million to his 2024 campaign [1]. DOGE. On-stage endorsements. Nobody even came close.

No, other big labs are not "innocent little virgins", but they're not even in the same solar system of harm as Musk. To hand-wave at the differences is to permit them.

[1] https://www.opensecrets.org/2024-presidential-race/donald-tr...

unsupp0rted 8 hours ago|||
Yes, but the other ones we don't like for ethical reasons, rather than religious reasons.
mlindner 8 hours ago||
[flagged]
TheOtherHobbes 8 hours ago|||
Musk is literally burning methane for funsies, and generating CSAM and getting sued for it.

Handing corporate code secrets to his AI model is... unusually trusting.

mlindner 8 hours ago||
How many years will go by before people will stop talking about the CSAM thing that happened for only a few days as if its still happening? FWIW, it's bad it was generated, but equating it to harming of real children I think is not a good thing.

And methane is a large percentage of all power production in the US. So again that also applies to all the other data centers. (And FWIW they've been winding down and shutting down the on site methane generators.)

And no corporate code was handed to AI models.

moomin 7 hours ago||
It’s not just that it was generated, it’s that they argued in court, _and won_, that it was legal, giving every last predator a nigh-on unverifiable defence.
grokgrokgrok 8 hours ago|||
I have to say grok, grok, grok, grok, grok. Also, anyone who doesn't modulate across models and run their own memory system is an idiot.
toader 9 hours ago||
[flagged]
ctrlkctrls 9 hours ago||
Judging by Elon's staggering success in all of his ventures I'd say you're out of touch.
toader 7 hours ago|||
Multiple things can be true at once, he can be wildly successful while also undermining democracy.
chris_money202 9 hours ago||||
Think we all can agree he has had staggering successes, but they have all come from having massive capital from Paypal which wasn't anything super innovative, it just solved a convenient problem at a convenient time and was awarded handsomely. Elon has put his capital to work in various ways to become successful, not all of the ways being morally sound.
zamalek 8 hours ago||||
All except Starlink and Tesla are burning money. I personally don't consider that "staggering success."
thereitgoes456 9 hours ago||||
He has had many failures, SolarCity and xAI and X and DOGE to name a few, but he has often bailed them out with his larger ventures.

Even with his successes (Tesla, SpaceX) he has built them up in large part by bending levers of government to his advantage.

sssilver 9 hours ago|||
I take issue with your use of the word "bend" here.

Can you provide specific examples of where Elon has bent the levers of government?

voidfunc 9 hours ago||||
> Even with his successes (Tesla, SpaceX) he has built them up in large part by bending levers of government to his advantage.

So what? Thats called being a maverick. He is very very good at executing on making money which is the point of business.

andsoitis 9 hours ago||
> He is very very good at executing on making money which is the point of business.

Also pushing technology forward.

redox99 9 hours ago||||
xAI is the most profitable part of SpaceX by far.
blisterpeanuts 8 hours ago||
About half of SpaceX revenue is Starlink subscriptions. Starlink is the one profitable division; the rest of the company operates at a loss, including xAI.
redox99 8 hours ago||
That's outdated and doesn't fully include the multiple billion per month contracts.

Anthropic: 1.25B/month

Google: 0.92B/month

Unnamed customer starting in december: 1.1B/month

Starlink monthly revenue is ~1.5B/month

chris_money202 8 hours ago||
Isn't this to rent the datacenters though? That's not really long term revenue if xAI will eventually need them back.
redox99 7 hours ago||
Renting datacenters is their mission, now on earth and later in space (assuming they deliver).
chris_money202 3 hours ago||
I don't know that's moving the goalpost, SpaceX's mission was not that originally. Some could say the original mission failed and they are pivoting, Elon will say it's a means to the end of the original mission still to save face. Some read it all as snake oil
brandonagr2 9 hours ago|||
What failed with X? Usage today is higher than ever
nozzlegear 8 hours ago||
Brand reputation; ROI; grok the sexual harassment bot; grok the CSAM bot; his free speech absolutism position. Take your pick.
keeda 57 minutes ago||
Not to mention the clearest indication of all, revenues: https://finance.yahoo.com/media-advertising/articles/spacex-...
oulipo 7 hours ago|||
You mean because he inherited wealth? sure, that's what most losers do
ls612 9 hours ago|||
Hardly seems worse than supporting Dario’s antics at least vis a vis AI. There are no saints in this industry, only a panoply of flawed humans.
Romanulus 9 hours ago|||
[dead]
jackfischer 9 hours ago|||
The public very much voted for massive administrative reform. Are you refering to DOGE, Elon Musk's influence on elections, something else?
nibbleyou 9 hours ago|||
I personally don't like him using his position to spread fake news and racist propaganda
estearum 9 hours ago||||
As if "the public" knows literally anything about how the US federal government is administered.

If anything, they voted for reduced debt burden and they got the opposite. DOGE failed at pretty much every single one of the goals that the public arguably gave it a mandate for.

serbuvlad 9 hours ago||
> As if "the public" knows literally anything

Ah, yes, democracy!, except for when the public is wrong.

Who decides when the public is wrong? We do! Who decides "what the public voted for"? We do! So we are the rulers? No, of course, not, this is democracy.

You want to become the decider of when the public is wrong and of what the public voted for? TYRANT! TYRANT!

estearum 8 hours ago|||
No, the claim above is "I know the voters' intent behind their vote based on who they voted for."

This is simply epistemologically incorrect. It's obviously incorrect in this case because voters writ large do not have any idea how the government is administered and how to improve it, so even if they claimed to be voting for that, it would not necessarily be an endorsement of any particular approach.

More specifically we know it's not true in this case because there are polls. Voters didn't even claim to care about this! "How the government is administered" was not a high salience issue to voters. Simple as that.

Nonetheless, I didn't suggest anything about overriding their votes. It sounds like you have some sensitive spots to work through (someone obliquely criticizing your idol for sucking at his job?)

verdverm 8 hours ago|||
being ignorant and influenced is different from being wrong, the american electorate is well known to be under informed

half of voters don't pay any attention to politics until the week or two before voting

maelito 9 hours ago|||
[flagged]
fourseventy 9 hours ago||
[flagged]
KyleTheDev 9 hours ago|||
Only sheep call other people sheep.

Sheep often like to think themselves the wolf or coyote, it would seem.

jml78 9 hours ago|||
Holy shit, what his whole speech. Yes go watch it. There is zero way. Zero it wasn’t a Nazi salute.

Fuck, it is like the denial around Jan 6th. Those idiots we’re live streaming that shit. I watched it go down live. Now they say they weren’t violent.

We can’t have discourse when we have legit video evidence and people refuse to open their eyes and choose to deny reality

sejje 8 hours ago||
Why would he make a Nazi salute and then shit all over Nazi ideology?

Which Nazi ideologies do you think he embraces? How do you reconcile all the Nazi ideologies he rejects?

nancyminusone 7 hours ago|||
He thinks it's funny and a big joke.
butlike 7 hours ago||||
"Hey bro, you have a lot of money but bet you can't do a nazi salute on live television"

"You're on, bro"

oulipo 7 hours ago|||
When did he "shit over nazi ideology"? He mentioned multiple times he favors white supremacy, and hates "empathy", how many more clues do you need?
AtlanticThird 9 hours ago||
Weird, that's the main reason I purchase all of Elon's products https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
thoman23 9 hours ago||
Привет, fellow American!
jmward01 9 hours ago||
[flagged]
andsoitis 9 hours ago|
Try it for software development.
jmward01 9 hours ago||
I have even less trust in their not training on my data/credentials/everything on my computer.
solid_fuel 9 hours ago|||
Seriously. They already get caught uploading everyone’s private credentials once before, one would have to be a particularly gullible rube to trust grok again. Especially with musk in charge.
sejje 8 hours ago|||
Maybe comment on model releases you've got some experience, or insight about.
simianwords 9 hours ago||
I guess it’s only my opinion but having used grok for personal chat: it’s by far the worst one amongst Claude, ChatGPT and even Deepseek, Gemini etc.

The personality is bland and it doesn’t work nearly as hard or even tries to help.

Capricorn2481 9 hours ago||
> The personality is bland

I don't use Grok, but do you want your LLM to have a personality? "Personality" is exactly what people don't like about Claude.

Razengan 9 hours ago||
I want my sexbot to have a personality
nython 8 hours ago||
What if it doesn't like you
longdong1 6 hours ago|||
Sexbots respond surprisingly well to abuse.
Razengan 6 hours ago||
longdong1

created: 9 minutes ago

That could have been said just as perfectly well from a main account my guy/guyette

Razengan 6 hours ago||||
That's also a kink
ethagnawl 8 hours ago|||
> it doesn’t work nearly as hard

Until you ask it to start generating horrific imagery and then it's best in class.

Shiggy_ 6 hours ago||
I would consider this a positive. I'm not interested in a company that wants to prevent you from using a tool that you're paying for.

The value of the internet is that people can share whatever they want, and use software how they want. This will mean that some people will abuse that. This is the tradeoff of a free society.

artemonster 9 hours ago|||
I used openrouter to send same prompt to qwen, derpseek, gemini and grok and found that grok does good research and produces less bullshit, especially when prompted to be critical of an idea
xutopia 9 hours ago||
Ask it to be critical of the birthday photos and see where that gets you.
artemonster 8 hours ago||
can you elaborate?
xutopia 5 hours ago|||
As stated by another comment Elon Musk's mother posted an AI-edited photo marked as such. It got edited right away to remove that label.

There are ample reasons to believe that Elon Musk is running his mother's account and that the photos weren't even real putting in question that he even had a birthday party.

If you ask Grok about what this means it will always take Elon's defence. It will vehemently deny that Elon would be capable or willing participant of such a thing even if you point out that he faked being a world class gamer, buying accounts that had done all the work and showing none of the skills when live-streaming.

jpadkins 1 hour ago||
> There are ample reasons to believe that Elon Musk is running his mother's account

Yeah, I'm sure the guy has time to run his mom's social media account. What's your reasons or evidence? Did you consider maybe it's a social media manager one of them hired running the account?

Paracompact 8 hours ago|||
Elon's mother recently posted an AI-generated photo of her son's birthday party. The tag indicating such was scrubbed as soon as it was pointed out.
raincole 6 hours ago|||
> The personality is bland

Sounds like a plus. Guess I will give Grok another try...

slowin 9 hours ago||
This has been my experience as well. Grok will end tasks almost immediately and claim "Done!". It's definitely the laziest and most "dishonest" of all the models. The others aren't perfect, but I can't use Grok for any serious coding task.
finnjohnsen2 5 hours ago|
Is Grok relevant? Who uses it?

Maybe I'm in some kind of bouble but I have never met or talked to anyone who has used Grok.

Brendinooo 4 hours ago||
I bought a month of use for $100. Early impressions of Grok 4.6 was that it's good at talking about ideas (got me unstuck from a piece of writing that I was working on; that bought it a TON of goodwill) and just okay as a coding tool compared to my more extensive use of Fable and Opus. Not as smart as Fable but cheaper; not as capable as Opus 5 but way less annoying along the way. And it generates images, which Anthropic doesn't do.

Not sure if I'll hold the subscription but I could see myself working with it more.

chronogram 5 hours ago|||
I use it in the car to talk to because it's built-in, mostly for navigation via voice. It seems to be an old or quantised model, because it seems a few years old, and it has strict rate limits unlike Gemini, where it really just shuts off if you talk to it a few times in one day, but it's still fun to show passengers who are still new to LLMs.
cvwright 4 hours ago|||
I tried it last month after hearing here that it didn’t speak in Claudisms.

As a chatbot it’s totally fine, virtually indistinguishable from Gemini or ChatGPT or Claude.

For coding it’s… okay. I tried 4.6 and it feels similar to Opus from 12 months ago, or maybe Sonnet from 9 months ago. YMMV.

moomoo11 4 hours ago|||
[flagged]
dofm 4 hours ago||
The only people I know of in the UK who will tell you that they use it are performatively alt-right or right wing. The kind of people who say "nanny-state" or "wokerati". GB News viewers. People who have an opinion on Meghan Markle that they think other people need to hear.

It's just an observation but so far a pretty solid correlation. Musk has so severely poisoned the well in terms of his UK reputation that the only people who are open about using Grok are... well, wankers is as good a word as any.

FWIW among the AI-using people, it mostly goes Claude Code, then Codex, then whatever runs on their Mac. The only Cursor user I knew has jumped ship to OpenCode.

soaaa 4 hours ago||
[dead]
More comments...