Top
Best
New

Posted by ksec 1 day ago

Grammarly will send unhinged messages to all your users if you try to cancel(www.reddit.com)
383 points | 103 commentspage 3
epihelix 1 day ago|
Just wait until the emails threaten to reveal all the compromising messages that users unwittingly sent to Grammarly's servers ...
iamacyborg 1 day ago||
Grammarly is a keylogger. Good riddance.
jgalt212 1 day ago||
I don't see a problem with this. B2B2C is a tricky dance with many stakeholders whose business needs are often ignored. If procurement cancels a service that users need without telling the users, which they have been known to do, that's a big problem.
kstrauser 1 day ago|
Counterpoint: don’t spam my users or I’ll cut off contact at the network level and block your app from running on our laptops.
jgalt212 1 day ago||
Sounds a bit disproportionate. If you do that, you better hope the vendor's CEO and your company's CEO are not golfing buddies.

And in my mind, one email alert or pop-up to all current users letting them know the service is going away (in case they had not been told which is as I've said before often the case in large orgs) is very far from the definition of spam.

kstrauser 1 day ago||
Conversely, I would not work for a CEO who would block me from doing my job duties. I'm hired to do a job. If I can't do that job, there's no point in being here. Other companies will pay me for my judgment.

If this happened in real life, I'd say "Joe," (because I'm on a first-name basis with the CEO and chat with him daily), "we had to block communications from Tom's company because they're pulling some bonkers stuff. You might let him know that he's pissing off customers right and left and needs to knock it off."

And yes, this is 100% the definition of spam. It's literally unsolicited commercial communication. Sending these mass instructions to flood the local IT admins is an enormous breech of trust.

dmitrygr 1 day ago||
That is ... bold.
snottynose 1 day ago|
I'm surprised people get worked up about this. I've felt like folks have learned to tolerate much worse and manipulative behavior from companies in the last two decades of personal computing... Not that I like it. I believed that society kind of accepted dystopia. Is it just that people are more sensitive because this happened in a corporate setting?
dmitrygr 1 day ago||
Tolerate due to lack of choice != accept, enjoy, do not try to avoid, do not have homicidal thoughts
xnx 1 day ago||
Scummy business uses scummy tactics. I am not surprised.
ElliotAndersonC 1 day ago||
[dead]
paganel 1 day ago||
[flagged]
alexkkoo93 1 day ago||
ngl respect the hustle ig. Maybe there's some dude in the company that uses grammarly everyday that leadership could otherwise care less about..

But why are we giving sys admins grammarly lmao

technion 1 day ago|
It's in the sysadmin sub because we are routinely the people told buy and manage Grammarly deployments, and we're the people generally cancelling those services now given everyone is being pushed to use their flavor of AI instead. And those emails from users upset that we're doing what management told us to do (following this Grammarly advice)? They go from end users to sysadmins.
londons_explore 1 day ago|
Doesn't look that unhinged to me.

An in-app notification saying 'your access ends on X date and here is who you should contact if that isn't what you want' is exactly what I'd expect.

wccrawford 1 day ago||
I think "unhinged" is a ridiculous word for it. They aren't crazy.

"Outrageous" is better. This will work on a lot of people, and they really will email their managers, because they're sheep. But it won't actually change the managers' minds for the positive. If I got wind of a plot like this against my decision, it would absolutely convince me to stay the course.

If the employees want to complain, I'll listen. If they're encouraged to complain, forget it.

progval 1 day ago|||
They also send an email with a template to send to the IT department
pluc 1 day ago|||
and namedropped the procurement person
alexkkoo93 1 day ago|||
Lmao sucks that it had to be the IT dept
jamesnorden 1 day ago||
The thing that didn't happen does sounds reasonable.