Top
Best
New

Posted by thm 4 hours ago

UK military jamming other nations' satellites to defend itself, BBC told(www.bbc.com)
107 points | 159 commentspage 2
jmspamerton 4 hours ago|
[dead]
einpoklum 2 hours ago||
[flagged]
mosura 4 hours ago||
[flagged]
nonethewiser 4 hours ago||
Its OK for the UK to be strong
unrented7977 4 hours ago|||
If you take a look back at history, literally everyone would disagree. A strong England has done unimaginable damage to almost every other society on the planet.
zahrc 3 hours ago|||
Any strong empire, nation or person in power has.

With great power yadda yadda

louthy 2 hours ago||||
How are those vaccines, antibiotics, and antiseptics working out for your nation? How many people would be dead in “every other society” without them?

Thank the Brits for that.

How’s the modern world in general working out for your nation? Would it be better off in pre-industrialised times? Do you enjoy being clothed and well fed; do you enjoy travel via bike, car, train, or plane and not needing to do back-breaking manual labour; do you like clean water and sanitation? Do you like to kick back and watch the TV after a long day? Or, listen to radio? Or maybe you prefer to make a long distance call to a friend? Assuming of course that you like turbines for power generation from coal, gas, nuclear, wind, or waves.

Yep, all of the above require the Brits again… [1]

Do you feel any pangs of irony when posting your dislike of Brits via the world-wide web, on a Turing machine based computer, powered by an ARM chip? ;)

Do you like sport? Music? Literature… ok I’ll stop now …

[1] https://youtu.be/DcZQS4LBugk

vondur 3 hours ago||||
Really, what kind of damage? Granted their cuisine isn’t the best, but it’s hardly damaging.
graemep 3 hours ago||||
England is not the UK.

Lots of people in former British colonies like and trust the UK.

password54321 3 hours ago||
Not really sure who we mean by "people". "People" will do business with the UK but that's not the same as "like" and "trust". If you mean regular people like from SEA that you have spoken to, yeah those people are generally nice and will act nice to your face. But many of them from those I have spoken to hold their grievances.
ChocolateGod 3 hours ago||||
I don't think we'd rather be speaking French right now.
candlewaxchewer 2 hours ago||
Yes, we would actually
nonethewiser 3 hours ago||||
Let me clarify.

Its OK for the UK for the UK to be strong.

dofm 2 hours ago|||
Famously excluding Portugal.

I am beginning to enjoy how deranged HN’s hatred of the British is. I try to explain to fellow Brits how much Americans in particular now hate us and it doesn’t register with them.

someonebaggy 3 hours ago||||
And also, all lives matter.

But the meaning of a statement is not solely determined by the words in it.

mosura 3 hours ago|||
If they were to do something positive with it then it would be nice.

Instead they are hell bent on criticizing and tearing down anyone that does, especially when their finance bros are invested in the legacy competition.

bigyabai 4 hours ago|||
Nobody is pretending to build or defend anything positive in space. Efforts like Starlink are blatantly and publicly a synthetic aperature radar constellation for military use: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starshield
ab5tract 4 hours ago|||
And in that respect, it was a deviation from the propaganda of previous eras, which did in fact frame efforts as building and defending positive things in space.
bigyabai 1 hour ago||
The V2, Cold War and original space race set the tone for anyone that was watching. After the Reykjavík Summit, it was clear that America had started down a nigh-irreversible path to commercialize, militarize and whitewash the space industry.
esskay 4 hours ago||
[flagged]
autoexec 4 hours ago||
> Defence Secretary Wes Streeting said daily lives depend on satellites that power everyday technologies like mobile phones and banking apps, adding the loss of GPS would cost the UK economy £1.4bn a day.

Oh no! Not our precious banking apps! What a weird thing to call out specifically. It's also kind of strange to talk at such length about how critical satellites have become to people's lives, national economy, emergency services, and people's "daily freedoms", only to conclude with "So now we're using ground-based systems to take out the satellites other countries depend on for all of those things"

jameshart 4 hours ago||
In a largely cashless society like the UK, ‘banking apps’ are effectively people’s wallets. Knowing you got paid, being able to pay your rent, being able to pay for goods and services… seem like pretty everyday concerns.
b112 3 hours ago|||
If you're bored, have Claude pull apart your APK and do a privacy report.

Your banking app is almost certainly using a company like (horrible and evil) Yodlee, which is given data by your banking app under the guise of "organizing your transactions into categories". Yodlee then quickly de-anonymizes it, by the identifiers which are identical and given to firebase, and various other orgs. Yodlee has been caught doing this before, and they still operate.

Lots of other companies do this, so if your banking app has any callbacks to anywhere but the bank itself, it's nothing but trouble.

After deanoymoization, such data is of course sold to everyone, including intelligence agencies, domestic and foreign.

jameshart 3 hours ago|||
What does this have to do with the claim at hand which is ‘we need to keep our comms infrastructure secure because critical things like the primary way our population conducts economic transactions depend upon it’?

That you find the population’s choice to use such mechanisms questionable, or that you think it is foolhardy to do so, does nothing to disobligate the government from trying to keep that infrastructure up and running.

b112 2 hours ago|||
The point more is, this is one primary mechanism to spy on the populous. Primarily via 5-eyes, which means Americans are buying this data to spy on UK citizens.
staplers 2 hours ago|||
I think they are pointing out it's an oxymoron. There's nothing to secure if the service itself is insecure and leaking..
TallGuyShort 2 hours ago||
It's classic what-aboutism though. Availability is part of security and that's what seems to be considered here. It's also the more immediate concern. Yes, the software supply chain and where your data goes has high potential for compromise. But I'm not actually seeing rampant fraud in my accounts or data leaks from my bank very often.
b112 2 hours ago||
High potential for compromise? No, the point is that every single transaction you make is being sold on the open market, that's the problem. Using cash prevents this. Using debit cards, credit cards, banking apps ensures this.

The banks provide the data anonymized, but then provide means to de-anonymize it.

TallGuyShort 2 hours ago||
You are discussing concerns that are completely orthogonal to the thread. The availability of digital banking was the concern. Not end to end privacy.
TallGuyShort 2 hours ago|||
So yeah that sucks, but... what does that have to do with the concerns being discussed here?

Digital banking in some form is pretty unavoidable for me unless I want a "live in the woods" type lifestyle and all the consequences of it. And I don't even live in the UK where they've embraced it more. My mortgage was sold to a very distant company and we've had mail problems. My dog recently needed middle of the night surgery and they wouldn't start without payment that exceeded normal cash reserves + daily.

Yes, all these things suck, but shooting digital banking in the knee without a solution to all that isn't helpful.

autoexec 2 hours ago||
Digital banking might be unavoidable but what did your app do that you couldn't have possibly done via your banks website?
TallGuyShort 2 hours ago||
You know, I didn't rush my laptop to the vet with me. If you're going to argue with the "mobile phones and banking app" line to this extent, I will freely admit: yes, if you want to be a Luddite, satellites are indeed unnecessary. You are absolutely right. But still not convincing me that's a weird thing for them call out here.
b112 2 hours ago|||
Realistically, paying your mortgage isn't giving any data a credit pull wouldn't. It's not a secret you live where you do. And one off emergencies aren't the problem.

It's foregoing cash for every single thing you do. That, combined with the telco selling data, Google linking that data to the number, and apps such as your banking app working in this same ecosystem, and companies such as Yodlee, your profile has a minute by minute location, plus what you spend and where.

It lets intelligence agencies, buying this data, create links between people. Who you know. Who you talk to. Where you go. What your hobbies are.

This gives the power of manipulation, for knowing who you are in the real world, combined with what you do online, means they know you better than you know yourself. And that's quite important, if you want to manipulate opinion.

All this may not matter to you, and if so, that's fine.

But this data is, quite frankly, what gives the Americans the power they have. The Americans aren't mighty due to guns, and weapons, and an army. They are mighty because of information.

Information is how you send a mere 40 dudes to kidnap the President and his wife from Venezuela. Information is how drone strikes perform targetted attacks. Information is how you manipulate elections in foreign countries. It's the sort of power that means you don't even have to fire a shot, to overthrow a government.

This information is what modern banking, and its apps, and companies such as Yodlee give to the Americans.

And as a Canadian, with the Americans blathering on about 51st state this and that, I am perhaps over sensitive to this fact. Because the last thing we need, is to give Americans power over us.

Any power.

Even the tiniest bit.

And information? Is more powerful than anything else they have.

TallGuyShort 2 hours ago||
You are discussing concerns that are completely orthogonal to the thread. The availability of digital banking was the concern. Not end to end privacy.
b112 2 hours ago||
It's OK. You can talk about things tangential to the main thread. It happens all the time on HN. And I'm not blaming you for anything.

My frustration is likely just showing, on this specific topic.

bigyabai 3 hours ago||||
That's going to be a problem when the UK faces sustained service disruption attacks. Building fragile systems like this during peacetime is usually an ill-informed bet.
pmg101 3 hours ago|||
Surely one of the great dividends of being at peace is not having to live like you're at war?
JumpCrisscross 2 hours ago|||
We’re not at nor heading towards peace. Pax Americana is failing. There isn’t a hippies-and-unicorns exist from that structure, not in a disorderly way.
someonebaggy 3 hours ago||||
I didn't realise only people at war used cash
jameshart 3 hours ago||
[dead]
bigyabai 3 hours ago|||
Rather the opposite. Peacetime is the only good opportunity to promote robustness and refuse toleration of vulnerable systems.

If you allow your banks and courts to be hacked freely by an adversary, then you can be manipulated into losing control of the escalation ladder.

autoexec 3 hours ago|||
At the very least the idea of a population fearing for their future if an app doesn't work is frankly horrifying. In the case of banking apps there are already multiple, simple, well established, and widely supported alternatives to using the app available to them, but that should really be the case for anything actually critical an app provides.
sieabahlpark 3 hours ago||||
[dead]
autoexec 3 hours ago|||
All of that can be handed via your bank's website, ATMs, a credit card, or even (god forbid) writing a cheque.
dukeyukey 10 minutes ago|||
I imagine that if all banking apps go down as a result of war then bank websites, credit cards, basically any other digital financial thing will also be down.
jameshart 3 hours ago||||
All of which (except the cheque, which we can ignore - nobody in the UK has a chequebook any more) depend on the same communication infrastructure that the app does.
autoexec 3 hours ago||
> All of which...depend on the same communication infrastructure that the app does.

That being the internet, which in the vast majority of cases doesn't depend on satellites either. Wifi, fiber, coax, and copper would continue to work just fine.

pixeljam 3 hours ago||||
A lot of banks in the UK have mobile-app-exclusive features / services. I imagine this is because of security, but it also makes little sense. If you don't have a smartphone it is about 5x harder to do anything online-banking related here. I remember when I went camping a bit ago my phone died and I was unable to unfreeze my card.

Also, cool username =)

autoexec 2 hours ago||
> I remember when I went camping a bit ago my phone died and I was unable to unfreeze my card.

Not even over the phone? I'd be furious. Cell phones die, get lost, get stolen, get run over, etc. I'd personally hate to feel so entirely dependent on my phone being there 100% of the time. I don't even always carry mine with me.

carlosjobim 3 hours ago|||
Do people write cheques in the UK?
mcintyre1994 3 hours ago|||
I’m in my early 30s and I don’t think I’ve ever written one. When I had my first bank account when I was maybe 10 I was given a cheque book, I don’t know where I’d get one now. I did recently receive a cheque for $12.99 or something like that from an Amazon settlement that I think is probably legitimate. Apparently Monzo can cash a cheque through their app so I’ll try that at some point. I’m guessing it won’t work with an international one though.
autoexec 2 hours ago|||
> when I was maybe 10 I was given a cheque book, I don’t know where I’d get one now.

I'm guessing you'd walk into your bank and ask for one. You can probably order one from their app somewhere.

rebolek 2 hours ago||||
I’m older (not in UK, in EU) and cheques are something weird from old movies. Never seen one in real life and concept is really strange.
dylan604 2 hours ago|||
A couple of years ago during lockdown, I was working with someone definitely qualifying as a boomer, to start up an e-commerce site for him. He was proudly showing me his ledger book of checks that he had to shell out $200 to receive while declining a debit card. On a couple of occasions, I went with him to get cash by driving to a bank branch, writing a check, and having the teller cash it for him. It took months to convince him that he absolutely needed a debit card when people were constantly asking if they could use Venmo/CashApp/etc to pay for products.

So we're still in a transitional stage where some people are still stuck on using checks.

autoexec 2 hours ago||
At least I see them being used less often in stores. Also how on earth was he paying $200 for checks? You can get them for < $15. Here's a book with a fish on it, and a ledger, and a cover for under $25 https://www.checks.com/p/856/wonders-of-the-sea-checks
dylan604 1 hour ago|||
Man, don't get me started. However, business accounts are more expensive than regular accounts. Also, why are you surprised that a bank has found a way to charge more fees?
esseph 1 hour ago|||
Check processing I think, not writing them
dylan604 1 hour ago||
No, the ~$200 fee was for the book ledger and blank checks. I have no idea what kind of monthly fees the bank was charging for the account. He was also getting raked over the coals on his merchant account to process credit cards because it was deemed a high risk business so most reputable places would not accept the business.
autoexec 3 hours ago||||
There are several companies in the UK offering cheque cashing services so I presume somebody there is getting them.
baliex 3 hours ago||||
No
TedDoesntTalk 3 hours ago|||
Or checks?
jameshart 3 hours ago||
Certainly not spelt (or spelled) like that.
tene80i 4 hours ago|||
Why is it strange? Millions of people use banking apps daily to make transactions essential to their lives and businesses.
notahacker 4 hours ago|||
It's also a favourite stat of the UK space industry that a large percentage of UK GDP is vaguely linked to space in some way, and "some of your financial transactions touch a satellite uplink or require location data" is one of the more tangible non-obvious ones.
autoexec 4 hours ago||||
Those apps can all be replaced by a website, and most banks already have those websites, which means if all the banking apps on earth stopped working right now the solution wouldn't involve anything more complicated than stabbing your finger at different icon on your phone and typing the name of your bank into a search engine.
mcintyre1994 3 hours ago|||
There are very few things that would cause banking apps to stop working while their websites continue to function.
autoexec 2 hours ago||
Presumably it'd be the loss of mobile service and/or GPS that would cause every banking app in the UK to fail, but I'm a bit skeptical that either one of those is a strict requirement.
vallerie 3 hours ago||||
not being funny - if the internet goes out how does a website make this better?
autoexec 3 hours ago||
> not being funny - if the internet goes out how does a website make this better?

The internet for most people doesn't depend on banking apps, or satellites. Wifi would still work great. If the internet actually did go out everywhere, how would an app help you?

vallerie 3 hours ago|||
The UK is an island nation that's reliant on undersea cables. If those cables are cut (which is something that Russia seems to threaten) your only fallback is satellite connectivity - so protecting that connectivity is pretty key to ensuring e.g people can access their money.

I would guess that was how Wes Streeting was briefed (and then completely bungled in public comms).

QDwQ1 3 hours ago||
ideally British banks would have their infrastructure located in Britain and therefore would not rely on undersea cables
vallerie 3 hours ago||
Monzo (a major UK bank) use AWS and GCP. Hopefully their DCs don't fail in some way when losing access to the outside world but I would hazard a guess something goes wrong.

https://monzo.com/blog/tolerating-full-cloud-outages-with-mo...

mylies43 3 hours ago||||
Thats the point, the reasons the apps dont work would be the same reason the websites dont work. They are not work around, I think apps is just mentioned because 90% of people use them over the website
someonebaggy 3 hours ago|||
Banking apps don't depend on satellites, either.
thesmtsolver2 2 hours ago||||
I think this comment is the tech equivalent of "if they can't eat bread, let them eat cake"
autoexec 2 hours ago||
That would imply that somehow a bank's website was a less accessible option than the app is, when the app is dependent on a mobile device as opposed to the website which is avilable on virtually any device with a browser including the same mobile device the app is installed on.
foldr 3 hours ago|||
That’s beyond about 90% of the population.
0x1ch 3 hours ago||||
It's not and it's also not uniquely a British thing either. Most of my friends and myself use our phones as wallets, in the US. The only time I use my physical cards is to pull cash from the ATM, ha.
asplake 3 hours ago||
In my household, we refer to coins as “parking tokens”.
0x1ch 3 hours ago||
I should start calling my jar of quarters the "laundry tokens" haha.
boredatoms 4 hours ago|||
Why does a banking app require GPS?
vallerie 3 hours ago|||
- The UK is an island nation

- In event of all undersea cables being cut (which is a serious threat from Russia), satellite internet is your only option to have traffic leave the UK

- Unfortunately most major banks in the UK have very fragile infra that relies on foreign cloud hosts e.g AWS or Azure, which could well fall over in unexpected ways if the UK was cut off from the world

To be clear I disagree with Wes Streeting on a lot of this but the UK is in a uniquely precarious spot when it comes to how much is reliant on internet access.

autoexec 3 hours ago|||
Those cloud hosts like AWS have infrastructure in the UK and a UK bank's data should already be there for performance reasons (see https://docs.aws.amazon.com/global-infrastructure/latest/reg...).

I can't promise that amazon has taken into account the possibility of not being able to phone home to the US, but I would hope an undersea cable cut is something they'd have already given serious consideration to. Cuts do happen every so often. Scandinavia in particular has seen several disruptions because of cable cuts.

Either way, it's a bit of leap to go from "We need to jam other countries satellites to protect your banking app" to "but what if the UK lost every satellite, and every undersea cable was cut, and all the local data centers and internet infrastructure in the UK stopped working!"

Melatonic 2 hours ago|||
Pretty sure there's no way current satellites can even get close to the bandwidth of satellite links.

Also isn't GPS always wireless ?

nickweb 4 hours ago||||
GPS relies on very very accurate timing. I would wager that the timing side of GPS is used more than the positioning side - but I have no way of confirming that.

Accurate timing is needed for banks accepting/sending payments (not just £5 for the window cleaner - more billions flowing every day).

O3marchnative 3 hours ago|||
That makes the issue worse as the actual app/device likely just relies on querying some NTP pool for accurate time. Then that would mean the actual stratum 1 servers are not working right.
ChocolateGod 3 hours ago|||
I wouldn't be surprised if financial institutions use GPS for time keeping.

It's more accurate than getting it from a NTP pool.

fiftyacorn 3 hours ago||||
Security - checking your not accessing it in UK one minute and australia the next minute

Some bank apps can block this access or request more validation

autoexec 3 hours ago||||
Data collection and targeted advertising
itsafarqueue 3 hours ago||||
To track you
sieabahlpark 3 hours ago||||
[dead]
someonebaggy 3 hours ago|||
It doesn't. They're making shit up.
dukeyukey 13 minutes ago|||
If banking went down we'd have a hell of a time. It's not like I keep 6 months rent in cash on me.
brightball 3 hours ago|||
Just read the article and the conclusion was that they're using ground based systems to disrupt other countries satellites that are targeting the UK, not the one's that those countries depend on for their own internal services.
autoexec 3 hours ago||
I guess the question is what does "targeting the UK" look like exactly? Flying over it? Flying over it with a camera?

They call out "tracking the movement of the UK's nuclear armed submarines or other sensitive military operations, such as those involving special forces." but that could mean they jam military satellites that are doing that, or it could mean they're jamming satellites that might be capable of doing that. What would that mean for something like a weather satellite?

TallGuyShort 3 hours ago|||
Look, I'm a big believer in the importance of cash as an option in our society and the importance of keeping a supply on-hand for emergencies, but my mortgage company, employer, and a lot of other financial concerns are hours away from me, so yeah - my banking app is pretty fucking important to my daily life, and I don't even live in the UK where they have embraced digital banking even more.

It's light on the details of what they're disrupting and how, but there is zero suggestion in the article that they are disrupting digital banking, the Internet, or consumer services at all for for other countries.

autoexec 2 hours ago||
Is there something on your banking app that you couldn't do by browsing to your banks website?
dukeyukey 7 minutes ago|||
I work for a UK fintech that is bank-adjacent, the backend for the apps and the website are the same.
TallGuyShort 2 hours ago|||
Asbolutely. Tap to pay options, and the better ones have stopped pushing SMS for 2FA and they will prefer their own apps over third-party ones. JPMC, Capital One and E-Trade (now Morgan Stanley) definitely all do this.
autoexec 2 hours ago||
Tap to pay is also doable with a credit/debit card, but paying via phone is a legitimately useful feature although also not remotely critical or something that would be world ending if it were disrupted.
someonebaggy 4 hours ago|||
The UK's largest export is banking (i.e. money laundering).
AnimalMuppet 1 hour ago||
Hate to break this to you, but not all banking is money laundering. Not even all banking in the UK. Not even all banking exported from the UK.
someonebaggy 1 hour ago||
You don't need another country to export your ordinary banking.
foldr 3 hours ago|||
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/cutting-edge-timing-techn...
autoexec 2 hours ago||
The US has ROCkN https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/robust-optical-clock... but that seems to be just for military use
rolymath 3 hours ago|||
Not a strange thing at all. London sees itself as the competitor for the finance capital of the world. Why would you think it's strange?
lloydatkinson 3 hours ago||
TIL my banking app goes via satellite internet /s

I have no idea what that quote is trying to say...

iAMkenough 3 hours ago||
one step closer to star wars
NooneAtAll3 2 hours ago||
has UK declared war on someone already?
nradov 3 hours ago|
It should be standard practice to use radio jammers and dazzling lasers against every non-allied foreign satellite that passes over our territory, or any of our military bases or warships. Why give them a free look?
dylan604 1 hour ago||
When I moved to the west coast, I was looking at the history and how cities like Burbank lived under a tarp cover that when viewed from the air looked nothing like the city/airport that they were covering. The fear of another Pearl Harbor like attack was that great. Plus, all of that cool shade while denying the enemy!!
gwbas1c 3 hours ago|||
Because that is one of the methods used to verify that everyone is complying with treaties, such as nuclear non-proliferation treaties.
nradov 3 hours ago||
Unfortunately it's a little too late for that, those treaties are effectively dead anyway. Not a good situation but that is our reality.
throwaway27448 2 hours ago||
It's a waste of money for no benefit to anyone but the military and its industrial parasites?