Posted by snikolaev 9 hours ago
But it is an open question how they got to the same ones: https://collusion.wiki/#open-questions
I'm not very surprised - the same model will logically tend to give the same answer for the same vibe set of requirements. I think it would be clear from the transcript that it had enough constraints and some motivation that made sense.
Or is it just a cheap PR (in a "hey, Aus govt friends, take some Share Options and let's do some PR together" style)?
It smells like shit.
The built-in "sandboxes" these companies provide are laughable.
The nearest in the articke is "We find evidence of unintended, task-driven agent-like activity" where unintended is apparently pure speculation.