Top
Best
New

Posted by daveoc64 7 hours ago

F-Droid 2.0(f-droid.org)
820 points | 233 commentspage 3
Dwedit 2 hours ago|
Can I finally block those bible apps?
kmarc 6 hours ago||
Great visual and usability update.

Even greater HN conversation about all the to-me-unknown alternatives. I used neostore as a replacement, but maybe time to try f-Droid again

einpoklum 1 hour ago||
1. Nice! :-)

2. Please donate a few EUR/bucks to F-Droid! It's a good place to get Android apps from, and we can't all just mooch off of it. Doesn't have to be a big donation.

3. I am worried that Alpahbet/Google will kill these "unauthorized" apps soon, so that the new version arriving would be kind of bittersweet. Although - maybe I'll just need to switch to LineageOS or something.

tukunjil 4 hours ago||
Not any super user but about three/four months, I'm using my device without any google account. Also not using any G service apps such as mail/yt/maps and of course play store. Instead of play store I found aurora store very helpful. "Very" because of the anonymous login future. But sometimes the store disturbs. Newly added apps on Play store doesn't appears on aurora. Also many applications fails to be installed without showing any reason. Some shitty apps redirect to the play store app (which I'm unable to disable but uninstalled her! Updates) and just doesn't works anything more then redirecting me. So I'm still not a fan of Aurora. But it's going not bad. But sometimes I should browse other sites to get old/delated from Play store apps. Also for mod/adless version of some apps.

I heard of fdriod but what I think it may only serves feature less, low UI/UX optimized apps. So didn't installed it yet. But something should be available where people can find all Play store apps (as aurora supplies) + premium/adsense deleted modified apps (random website) + Open source apps (fdroid)…… this will make android insane

parisiansam 6 hours ago||
I wonder if FDroid has a policy against LLM? i was reading one of the MR here https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidclient/-/merge_requests/1729 and they seem to gate on LLM contributions (and vibe coded android app)?
amiantos 3 hours ago||
lol @ 'ai;dr' to a 2 line PR, anti-ai people really are just bullies now
someonebaggy 4 hours ago||
In summary of this MR: no, they do not ban AI
Thev00d00 6 hours ago||
Urgh such a shame to be written by LLM
1970-01-01 5 hours ago||
Fitting, as there really are only 2.0 trustworthy app stores for Android.
cf100clunk 7 hours ago||
That page uses the term ''repository''' singular. Can additional repos be added in the way Neo Store allows?
szszrk 7 hours ago||
Yes. F-droid allows that, you can have multiple repositories and ... a few of those even exist :)

I'm using that with 2.0 (or rather with F-droid Basic, but I noticed Basic was updated to the same that is described in article, but a while ago). It works just fine.

reddalo 7 hours ago||
It's always been possible on F-Droid, I doubt they would change something like that.
97laos 5 hours ago||
Love it new design fdroid basic really smooth in my ancient phone.
magnat 7 hours ago|
And still no popularity rating, download count or any user review system whatsoever.
Velocifyer 6 hours ago||
Except the 2.0 does have a most popular apps section.
OutOfHere 6 hours ago|||
Can't you at least see and file issues and discussions on the respective app's code repo site? This is often although not always sufficient, as the repo owner can censor issues and discussions.

Google has for years censored app reviews anyway on its Play Store, and also allowed too many low-value reviews which drown out useful reviews.

redsocksfan45 7 hours ago|||
[dead]
echelon 7 hours ago||
Because nobody uses it except a handful of uber-nerds who can put up with wasting hours of time for "altruism".

The answer to freedom isn't another marketplace. It's legislation that requires Google and Apple to allow web installs without scare walls or deeply hidden permission toggles.

You should be able to just download an app. And Grandma should be able to do it.

There's nothing insecure about it in a world of sandboxing, permissions, scanning, blacklisting, etc. When the tech giants are more than happy to sell ads to malware, you know their "safety" stance is just economic moat protectionism.

---

Edit because of rate limits:

This is not derogatory. This is making the point that the wrong battle is being fought. F-droid fans are cheering a small victory, yet losing the entire war.

F-droid does not matter in the grand scheme of things. It's not the point. The point is the app store monopoly. That there are only two platforms and that both are almost completely locked down.

F-droid users don't even see that Google is purposefully allowing this as an antitrust sponge in their calculus. Google doesn't mind because 0.0001% of their users will install this. If they had a sense that the regulators wouldn't bother them, they'd just as well close this loophole. And they probably will eventually.

This isn't beachhead, and even if it was, it isn't sound footing or a stable foundation. It can easily go away.

rpdillon 7 hours ago|||
> Because nobody uses it except a handful of uber-nerds who can put up with wasting hours of time for "altruism".

This seems weirdly derogatory towards people that use F-Droid.

nazgulsenpai 7 hours ago||
As an F-Droid user for idk how many years now, I'd say it's spot on!
rpdillon 4 hours ago||
Really? I don't understand

> put up with wasting hours of time for "altruism".

at all. I feel like I install apps from the store, and use them. So I'm confused by both "hours of time" and "altruism".

yjftsjthsd-h 7 hours ago|||
> Because nobody uses it except a handful of uber-nerds who can put up with wasting hours of time for "altruism".

What? I'm not sure how you would manage to waste hours installing a single app and then using it to install other apps, and I'm not using it because of "altruism" (what does that even mean?), I'm using it because it's the best way to get apps.

> You should be able to just download an app. And Grandma should be able to do it.

> There's nothing insecure about it in a world of sandboxing, permissions, scanning, blacklisting, etc. When the tech giants are more than happy to sell ads to malware, you know their "safety" stance is just economic moat protectionism.

Even if you 100% trust Android's sandboxing and permissions, which is... not a choice I would personally make, I like it when my apps don't have scams or ads internally, either. I'm not worried about Grandma downloading any app off F-Droid; I am a little concerned about what happens if she can download any app being pushed by any random website.

More comments...