Top
Best
New

Posted by daveoc64 9 hours ago

F-Droid 2.0(f-droid.org)
877 points | 248 commentspage 5
laruss5 7 hours ago|
[dead]
Kellyabia 3 hours ago||
[dead]
hathym 4 hours ago||
[dead]
zb3 8 hours ago||
> All new code in this effort uses modern Android code standards and designs. This gives us a codebase that is easier to maintain, test, and easier to extend with new features in the future.

No, this increases the overall complexity of the system. Android will hopefully eventually collapse under its own weight.

OutOfHere 7 hours ago|
Once GrapheneOS ships on devices, it and Samsung can in time pick up where Android stops.
mightysashiman 6 hours ago||
Did they implement any GrapheneOS security complaints for it to be deemed actually secure?
someonebaggy 6 hours ago|
GrapheneOS security complaints about F-Droid are a load of nonsense except for one: the APK on the website is signed by a different key from the one that F-Droid updates itself with.
eighthave 4 hours ago||
> the APK on the website is signed by a different key from the one that F-Droid updates itself with

Could you explain? I don't understand what you mean here. https://f-droid.org/F-Droid.apk is signed by the same key that signs https://f-droid.org/repo/entry.jar

1vuio0pswjnm7 2 hours ago|
"F-Droid 2.0 now fetches and installs app updates by default."

Why not download source, review, (edit) and compile on the device, e.g., using Termux, Gradle and Android cmdline-tools

Is "convenience" the rationale for the F-Droid app

Maybe it's the same rationale that drives Linux users toward "binary package managers"

NoahZuniga 2 hours ago||
Running a malicious build script is just as bad as running a malicious app, so I don´t see why you want that? Also F-droid has fully reproducible builds, so you can be sure you'll get the same binary.
epenn 2 hours ago||
Speed. Most people are going to choose a fast binary download + automated integrity check over compiling from source, regardless of their reason for using F-Droid.