Top
Best
New

Posted by sidharthkmenon 6 hours ago

Show HN: Whiteboard (YC W26) – An open-source IDE for thoughtful software design(github.com)
Hello! We’re Sid, Alex, Ketan, and Milan. We’re building Whiteboard (https://whiteboard.dev.fast/), an open-source desktop app where humans and agents can architect software together in a common workspace. Here’s our repo: https://github.com/devdotfast/whiteboard.

We were missing the feeling of a “whiteboard session” with another dev where you leave with a deep understanding of a system, so we built this app for ourselves. Whiteboard plugs into the tools you already use - e.g. Claude Code, Codex, etc. – and gives your agent an SDK to draw on an in-app canvas to describe its work. We began with an MVP based on HTML artifacts and started rethinking the app as we ran into limitations:

1. Built on top of CodeOSS: We found that in pure HTML tools it was hard to connect a spec or diagram to code. In Whiteboard, when you click on visualizations like a sequence diagram, an entity relationship diagram, or a quote from the agent’s trace, you can jump to the underlying code directly. When navigating code, you get keybindings and LSP support from VSCode out of the box. We’ve found this is especially valuable because tradeoffs are often only discovered after a first pass at implementation (re: slop)

2. Semantic diff viewer: we wrote a semantic, AST-aware diff viewer in Rust so you can only view the code changes which are relevant to you [1]. We’ve set up some sane defaults: large added functions are summarized as pseudocode, and things like unit tests and large documentation changes are collapsed / hidden. This is all customizable with a WASM-based plugin system.

3. Decision Log: We found it difficult to reason about what set of decisions our agents made autonomously. So we built tools for agents to query and link their own traces to the Whiteboard, so you can understand how the requirements that you set were implemented, and understand what decisions your agent made autonomously.

Here’s a quick demo video explaining more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChPn3ftULWE

Folks at companies like Salesforce and Modal are using Whiteboard today as a review tool for architecture or spec-level changes – really any change where they want to be involved:

1. Reviewing your own coding agent’s work: because Whiteboard makes it easier to review large amounts of code, folks will typically have their AI agents create a prototype and a corresponding Whiteboard session so they can iterate on the design.

2. Reviewing other people’s changes: We’ve found that Whiteboard is particularly helpful when composed with tools like Greptile. For example, you can run an automated code reviewer on small changes and escalate to a Whiteboard session for the changes that require human judgement.

Why we built this: we’re four buddies from college who quit our jobs as tech leads right before agentic coding became industry standard. As we iterated towards an MVP for a previous idea, we struggled to maintain a comprehensible codebase while reaping all the velocity benefits of agentic coding. As more PRs were merged without our understanding, we felt a ‘cognitive debt’ begin to seep in, until it became difficult for us to even contribute to the system [2].

We’re releasing our desktop app under an MIT license. Please poke through and feel free to contribute! Eventually we’ll charge companies for a hosted web version that manages whiteboard session creation alongside features like trajectory storage and multiplayer reviews. Everything will always remain self-hostable.

Thanks for reading, and we hope you try it out! We would love to hear any feedback and to learn from your expertise.

Here’s are the project links again: https://github.com/devdotfast/whiteboard, and you can install (for MacOS + Linux) at https://install.dev.fast

[1] diffs library: https://github.com/devdotfast/diffr [2] Credit for the term ‘cognitive debt’ goes to https://www.geoffreylitt.com/2026/07/02/understanding-is-the...

154 points | 66 commentspage 3
asdev 3 hours ago|
I think the issue with this type of product is it creates an N+1 source of truth for teams alongside their other tools. Inherently, this will get out of date as a project progresses. You could have an agent update based on changes, but that would likely degrade the design doc/artifact into unintelligible slop which wouldn't be useful in the future. This is a behavioral/structural problem of software design in general, which I don't think can be solved by software. Perhaps if this is mainly focused on collaboration at design time, but then that begs the question if teams will really want this tool versus using Notion, Linear, Google Docs.
milanb 3 hours ago|
I think you’re on the money with the problem of maintaining (another) source of truth.

Speaking from personal experience, I still find myself reaching for Whiteboard. It’s helpful when it’s critical for me as a developer to understand the implementation, which is certainly not every change!

In the future, we want to deliver a hosted product that addresses the N+1 concern you raised. The problem with the existing tools is that plans don’t stay up to date with what the agent decided to implement, and the back-and-forth that happens after the initial prompt isn’t captured. We believe a single whiteboard canvas can be used to capture not only a plan at design time, but what happens after.

shaundano 4 hours ago||
Very happy to see a product like this. UML-style diagramming is still a part of my workflow when designing any architecture. Excited to try it out.
theaniketmaurya 4 hours ago||
looks great! personally for me, system design is quite imporatn and cognitive debt is shooting up
artur_makly 3 hours ago||
Congrats! Looks tight.
souvlakee 5 hours ago||
Loved that zed-inspired landing pages.
sidharthkmenon 5 hours ago|
thanks, appreciate it! we also took inspiration from paper.design. the tmux bits are just for fun though :)
huflungdung 4 hours ago||
[dead]
eliburnes 4 hours ago||
Excited to try this out!
komposit 5 hours ago||
Cool idea will give this a try!
saadn92 5 hours ago||
What does pricing look like?
ketan_around 5 hours ago|
free, oss, and local-only right now! we are working on a hosted solution but honestly aren't sure yet; we mostly made this for ourselves to fix our own gripes with agentic coding :)
_puk 4 hours ago||
How does that fit the YC W26?

You building something else and this scratches an itch?

That aside. I actually love this. Anything that helps with the "wtf did you just do?".

If I can still learn I will. If an agent can't reason about the changes made, then they are not good changes.

verdverm 3 hours ago||
I was confused for a moment by the name "Sid" in new coding tools.

Sid of GitLab raised for Kilo, and GitLab is also of YC

https://capwolf.com/former-gitlab-ceo-launches-kilo-in-ai-co...

sidharthkmenon 3 hours ago|
haha, different sid, also YC!
verdverm 4 hours ago|
Does it have a terminal and panes? These are things I do not ever see giving up
sidharthkmenon 3 hours ago||
it's meant to be used as a complement to your existing terminal! your agent uses the mcp or api from the terminal to draw on the Whiteboard
verdverm 3 hours ago||
I'm asking about terminals in the IDE, I have many of them, really multiple panes, each pane is agent(s) in terminals and the associated files/diff for their work. VS Code looks more like a dashboard for agents these days. (50" 4k)

The headline says "IDE", but what you wrote here does not sound like an IDE, why would I want my agent calling an MCP / API to do the things your feature list suggests? What I'm seeing here would/could be better/replicated as a VS Code extension

I'm only interested in an "Integrated Developer Experience", winner takes all kind of thing, tool sprawl is out of hand

More comments...