I guess it's not really a benchmark but you could say if it can do it faster it sort of could be taken as one.
raverbashing 11 hours ago||
Jeeves, that's a name I haven't heard in a long time...
gizajob 11 hours ago||
Personally I’m happy that after a 30 year effort and hundreds of billions spent, AskJeeves finally works as intended.
fishfasell 11 hours ago|||
If Jeeves returned as an AI chat bot it would be the most brilliant resurgence of nostalgia
grokkedit 11 hours ago||
jeeves is currently the name of my local hosted assistant, in its context there are rules that tell it to behave like good old jeeves.
soon I'll make sure that my home assistant pod answers to "Hey jeeves"
kjs3 10 hours ago|||
We locked him in the basement with Clippy, Bob and BonziBuddy. Who opened the damn basement door???
lherron 10 hours ago||
…a long time.
singularity2001 8 hours ago||
In my experience, Jev is only faster because it's a small shitty model. Any objections?
speedping 5 hours ago||
Meh. Wake me up when it reasons in latent space and answers in less than a second
esafak 10 hours ago||
Jev-like models give calibrated decision probabilities, but at low accuracy.
So why didn't they show both??
phplovesong 11 hours ago||
So "askjeeves" has been resurrected?
SV_BubbleTime 6 hours ago||
“Somehow Jeeves returned…”
hjun1052 11 hours ago||
If the model does autoregressive reasoning before the decision, doesn't that give up much of what a Jev-style model buys you (a single forward pass, cheap calibrated probabilities)? Or is the point mainly to keep the typed output and probability interface while getting better accuracy on harder cases?