Top
Best
New

Posted by irs 2 hours ago

Show HN: gtlds.fyi – All the proposed new gTLDs(gtlds.fyi)
29 points | 32 commentspage 2
pasc1878 1 hour ago|
How many of these are companies that learnt from the 1990s and made sure they registered their own name/tradmarks etc rather than having to buy them off scalpers, even though they might have no plans to use them?
embedding-shape 1 hour ago||
Finally .scam might be something for all us scammer, I'm tired of getting mixed up with a bunch of honest-looking people.

None of this seem to have any rhyme or reason. What's the reason for these to exists, besides to raise funds for whorever is selling these?

etatester 1 hour ago|
The cat is out of the bag. TLDs are now the domains of the rich. Why not have .taylorswift? It's just 250k https://gtlds.fyi/names/taylorswift

As for the rest, meh, these could be "I have an idea for a domain" but the domain costs 250k

devmor 1 hour ago||
I'm exhausted by all of the new gTLDs at this point, opening them up to specific companies and organizations basically violated the entire purpose of a gTLD in the first place.
sixtyj 1 hour ago||
Every possible word can become a TLD :)
fooqux 1 hour ago|
Why limit yourself to just words? I'm hoping to get one of the single-letter domains on the new abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz TLD if I can afford it.
OutOfHere 1 hour ago||
Why are these TLDs so tightly bound to a specific organization? Why can't their registration be more open? Keeping them so locked down makes them useless. Or am I misunderstanding something?
majorchord 59 minutes ago||
I thought TLDs were sponsored/registered by corporations, and hence had a say in what can be registered on that TLD and by whom.
input_sh 6 minutes ago||
> and hence had a say in what can be registered on that TLD and by whom.

Not quite, assuming we're not talking about .brand, they have to make them available for purchase by the general public. However, they do get to dictate prices.

MarsIronPI 1 hour ago||
Am I the only one who's not a fan of these new, longer TLDs? IMO TLDs should be two or three characters. I'm not sure why I feel this way, but there's something unwieldy about a TLD like .cooking.
jnettome 1 hour ago||
What we really need is one char TLDs so we bring back WWW

eg: www.x

arccy 17 minutes ago|||
imagine it were shorter... like 0 characters.

this is what the new gTLDs are.

ocdtrekkie 1 hour ago|||
In theory it can be shorter. Imagine good.cooking is shorter than goodcooking.com

But every one of these plays with all sorts of collisions of user expectations. "word.cloud.microsoft" is one of those URLs that will never look right to me, but is now a corporate staple.

OutOfHere 1 hour ago||
2 to 4 chars is a good range.
ChrisArchitect 1 hour ago||
ICANN announcement about what this is: https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-reveals...