Top
Best
New

Posted by bilsbie 12 hours ago

Scam American companies are using to manipulate ingredient lists(twitter.com)
88 points | 88 comments
squeegeeninja 2 hours ago|
This is such a bad video. Someone else's video, cut over multiple different times, a horrible slurred AI voice, shaky filmed screen with a guy talking over… Each layer adds nothing, but somehow this is the version worthy of sharing?
vconnor 3 minutes ago|
The TikTok generation is on Hacker News now. This is their bread and butter.

I wonder how long until we have a tiktok.com post on the front page.

WarmWash 11 hours ago||
I think even worse than this is the disconnect between a product name and the actual composition of the product.

Its most rampant with juices, where every juice is actually just apple juice (from concentrate, so mostly water anyway) with a splash of [fruit] juice thrown in (also from concentrate, so also mostly water). Maybe if you are lucky you'll catch an apple shown on the front label behind the huge passion fruit or whatever.

This even extends to clothing, where stuff like "Wool Sweater" is 5% wool 15% cotton and 80% polyester.

It should be a law that the primary ingredient of a product being the leading noun in the name of the product.

card_zero 11 hours ago|
But lots of things are mostly water. Fresh fruit juice, wine, meat, humans. They're just not made by adding water. Beer is though. I don't think it should be labelled "water".
WarmWash 10 hours ago||
"From concentrate" pretty much means all the water was taken out, and then they decided how much to put back in. It also allows them to make incredibly sugary drinks while also advertising "No added sugar".

I suppose to be fair, whole pressed juices are incredibly expensive. But I think they should be forced to be more upfront about what these "juices" actually are - mostly apple juice powder with a few other fruit powders sprinkled in and then mixed with water to the desired sweetness level.

card_zero 10 hours ago||
The wool thing is mysterious, because I keep hearing about sheep farmers losing money on shearing sheep because the raw wool price is too low, and then I went round a fabric shop the other day and it was all polyester, I don't get why.
killingtime74 3 hours ago|||
There's many grades of wool and the coarse ones really are very cheap. So cheap as to be used for carpet in government schools (in NZ/Australia).
ahi 1 hour ago||||
Polyester ~$1000/MT, wool ~$15,000/MT. Polyester is cheap, barely more than it's feedstocks.
dylan604 3 hours ago|||
Polyester can be made 24/7 365 while wool comes in batches. Also, regardless of how low wool prices are, it will be more expensive than polyester components as the sheep require being fed and what not. Maybe polyester prices are affected by Hormuz closing????
crazygringo 11 hours ago||
It's not a scam. And added sugars are listed prominently in the nutrition facts.

It's the fact that different sugars have different properties. In terms of texture, moisture, etc. And they can be used at different stages of the manufacturing process.

There's nothing wrong with this. Nutrition facts clearly label the total added sugars.

Plus, strawberries are often going to be listed first anyways because traditional jam is approximately a 1:1 ratio of fruit to sugar. So even if it were just one type of sugar, strawberries could still be listed first.

refurb 2 hours ago||
I agree, no scam here.

When I look at an ingredients labels I assume it’s listed by order of quantity, but it tells you nothing about the total amount.

You could have two ingredients listed but you don’t know if it’s 99% first ingredient, 1% second or 50.1% first and 49.9% second.

That’s why you look at the nutritional label

inanutshellus 11 hours ago|||
You're defending the example (why idk), but what about, say, a dog food company listing "buffalo meat" as its #1 ingredient by simply splitting every filler ingredient into constituent parts?

How does one reward the "good guys" when one can't tell the difference between a gamed metric and an honest one?

crazygringo 8 hours ago||
Why? Because I once researched it also assuming it was a scam, and then found out it very much wasn't.

I can't speak to dog food, I haven't researched that -- just the multiple sugar types. And also that when ice cream lists skim milk as an ingredient along with heavy cream, this isn't to make it appear healthier either -- it's to control the overall milkfat levels.

But if you're looking for nutritional information, that's literally on the label next to the ingredients. If you want to judge the protein or the sugar, then just look at that. If you're trying to judge those amounts by looking at the order of ingredients, that's your mistake to begin with.

hn_throwaway_99 4 hours ago||
I agree with this. "Scam" is used way too liberally these days. I can read , and like you say the nutrition facts clearly list total added sugars in a standardized way.

Completely unrelated topic, but Lord I wish cookie popups were standardized the same way nutrition facts are.

gumby 11 hours ago||
I remember looking at a carton of Whole Foods soy milk that prominently said “no added sugar”.

I looked on the back and after water the second ingredient was “dehydrated cane juice”.

The food system has been gamed forever.

hn_throwaway_99 4 hours ago|
Unless you can link some actual reference, I'm going to call bullshit on this one. Dehydrated cane juice is literally just (less refined) sugar, and in my experience I have never seen a "no added sugar" label on a product with dehydrated cane juice. I actually look a lot for this because in my experience "all natural" combined with "no added sugar" almost always means Stevia, and I can't stand that stuff.

I just did a search online and all the Whole Foods soy milk I could fine listed either "organic cane sugar" as an ingredient, or was unsweetened.

m463 3 hours ago||
I get frustrated too. I avoid aspartame/sucralose/etc... then it turns out they have stevia/monk fruit extract/etc

oh, and there are some other ones that you might want to avoid.

A low FODMAP diet would cut out not only fructose, but lactose and the -itols like sorbitol, xylitol, and mannitol

tastyfreeze 2 hours ago||
The -itols just shouldn't be allowed in food. Consume too much and you best not be out in public.
timcobb 52 minutes ago||
This is why the "total added sugars" line is critical and why it was fought tooth and nail by "food" companies for decades.
yummypaint 11 hours ago||
Simply adopting reasonable labeling rules proven in other countries would fix a lot of problems in general. Japan has a great system for beverages. It wouldn't hurt if we adopted their safety standards around eggs either. https://xn--btro1dr1yrpow7m.com/en/what-are-the-rules-for-ju...
somenameforme 1 hour ago||
The irony is that this is the entire reason that the FDA was originally formed - to provide clarity and standardization on food ingredients, but now the FDA is often controlled by the exact same organizations that it's supposed to regulate.

Perhaps it's time for the FDA 2.0 where leadership cannot have any connection whatsoever to the organizations being regulated. If I need years of industry experience and a doctorate to understand why you're adding a chemical to my food, then I don't want it in my food. I don't think that's an unreasonable position. We were far healthier before all of these 'safe' chemicals and additives began being added to food.

longbrass 4 hours ago|||
But like has anyone spared a thought for the shareholders?
ButlerianJihad 2 hours ago||
You do not seem to appreciate how regulation works in general in the United States. Product labeling is a perpetual game of cat-and-mouse. I can give you a litany of ways that vendors skirt the regulations, hide ingredients, lie to consumers, and falsify their labels while still remaining 100% legal. And obviously, I am not privy to all of their tricks, but just some of the obvious ones.

I do not know if the Utopian Japanese Food Industry* is so trustworthy and impeccable so as not to mislead customers or engage in malicious compliance. Perhaps they simply abide by the rules and manufacture honest food and inedible leaden paint chips. I don't know; Japan is the place where you can insert your whole rice into a streetside vending machine to have it robbed of nutrients... err, hulled and sifted.

Since I live next-door to a pan-asian market now, I will eventually figure out how they are labeling their sodas and snack foods. Thank you.

* Heartily endorsed/promoted by the sugary, indefatigable punk princess Avril Lavigne: https://youtu.be/LiaYDPRedWQ?si=_ZB7CmKX9RA9C040

God, I miss Tower Records

joeblubaugh 22 minutes ago||
If you make jam at home you’re going to be adding a very similar amount of sugar. Ingredient splitting may be an issue, but a sweet fruit preserve is a silly choice for showing it.
gruez 11 hours ago||
Deception is bad, but from a nutritional point of view this really shouldn't be an issue for informed consumers (ie. people who read the ingredient lists) given that "nutrition facts" also exists. 10g of sugar is 10g of sugar, regardless if it came from a strawberry, fruit juices, or HFCS. This is especially true in highly processed foods, where the processing eliminates any advantage that "natural" sugars have.
doctorpangloss 2 hours ago||
I want to buy the thing that was the most expensive and exuberant to manufacture for the lowest price. So yeah, when I want jam, I want jam that is the most strawberries. This isn't complicated.
OutOfHere 11 hours ago|||
> 10g of sugar is 10g of sugar, regardless if it came from a strawberry, fruit juices, or HFCS.

From a biological pov, that is wrong on so many levels. It is why labels now have Added Sugars listed separately. Sugars as whole fruit aren't unhealthy in moderation, whereas HFCS is one if the unhealthiest added sugars. There is no way to equate them except in pure chemistry with no relation to biology.

gruez 8 hours ago||
>Sugars as whole fruit aren't unhealthy in moderation

That's why I specifically mentioned the processing part. Sugar in apple might not be comparable to sugar in a coke, but all of that goes out the window when you're comparing the sugar content of jellies.

>whereas HFCS is one if the unhealthiest added sugars. There is no way to equate them except in pure chemistry with no relation to biology.

Source?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-fructose_corn_syrup#Healt...

>As of 2026, there is no scientific consensus or regulatory concern that fructose or HFCS impacts cardiometabolic health when substituted for sucrose

OutOfHere 6 hours ago||
[flagged]
da_chicken 2 hours ago||
No, making the law only protect those who are informed is a poor idea on many fronts.

Firstly, you've incentivized companies to prevent people from becoming informed. You can already see online that lies spread faster because they don't have the inconvenience of needing to be true. You have one truth, and it has to stand up to countless thousands of lies.

Secondly, nobody can be informed about everything. The whole reason we have experts is because they are the ones informed on their subject, and they devote their entire careers to it. You cannot possibly be well-read and up to speed about everything you buy while still being able to function as a human being.

Thirdly, what happens when the deceptive, shitty product completely out-competes the safer one because it's that much cheaper? Hey, guess what? You can't buy the safe or sustainable version of the product anymore because every business that did went out of business. It's no longer in the market.

m463 4 hours ago|
The problem I had was figuring if a product had Sodium Lauryl Sulfate.

I found that if I wash my sheets with detergents with it, the first night my sheets make me feel like I'm sleeping with a sunburn.

Apparently toothpaste with SLS might cause canker sores.

It is deliberately hard to determine!

lol, here's a website:

https://namephantom.com/other-names-for-sodium-lauryl-sulfat...

they use different names on purpose.

CobaltFire 3 hours ago|
Yup, stopped using SLS toothpaste because I heard that it could be causing my canker sores. I've had ONE in the three years since, when they were a weekly occurrence before.
lostlogin 3 hours ago|||
> canker sores

TIL Canker sores are a specific type of mouth ulcer. Where I am (New Zealand), this would just be called a mouth ulcer.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/canker-sore/s...

m463 3 hours ago|||
same here.

also, when I was young I worried I might have herpes or something, but doctor told me canker sores are different from cold sores. Later in life, turns out there might be a chance I have crohns?

maddie0 2 hours ago|||
there's a big constellation of autoinflammatory health issues that affect people, especially the autistic/adhd types who might find their way to Hacker News in large numbers

if you are not already familiar, you should have your doctor go through https://allbrainsbelong.org/clinician-resources/ (this is a nonprofit's project funded through an HHS grant) and see what actually applies to you

Crohn's, irritable bowel syndrome, regular old heartburn, brain fog, chronic fatigue, depression, sleep apnea, hives, rashes, waking up in the middle of the night, heat sensitivities, Ehler-Danlos, joint issues, vascular issues, dizziness on standing, arthritis, long COVID... it's quite the list!!

(and it's really frustrating when (e.g.) a cheap allergy medication can solve half your problems and you go without it for years because no one's thought to connect those dots)

CobaltFire 3 hours ago|||
I do have autoimmune issues, but I had a totally different gut issue that they basically hand waved as IBS due to those until a different set of docs realized it was a dysfunctional gallbladder. I had been dealing with weekly gall bladder attacks for a decade and then they pulled it.

Just to say, be careful with the diagnosis. They can be rather imprecise.

More comments...