Top
Best
New

Posted by speckx 3 hours ago

Someone on Torrent Sites Kept Fucking with My Sonarr(thereallo.dev)
97 points | 44 commentspage 2
egberts1 1 hour ago|
Sonarr could have ignored those EXE filetypes, no?
dd_xplore 2 hours ago||
The same happens for other series as well! I was frustrated with it! Good thing you decompiled this monstrosity
bastard_op 1 hour ago||
Welcome to piracy, you must be new here. This has been occurring for some time, I've seen it for years to occasionally find a media named exe to delete and manually redownload.

Scammers always have a new trick up their sleeve.

para_parolu 2 hours ago||
Ince I discovered usenet I rarely want to deal with torrents
stronglikedan 2 hours ago|
As someone who still pays for usenet, the benefit of torrents is anything older than a couple of days, since stuff gets pulled from usenet servers almost as soon as it's posted. Of course, if you have everything pre-configured to find and grab everything you're interested in, you won't even notice, but sometimes I just get an itch to watch something older off the cuff, and that's where torrents shine.
joloooo 2 hours ago||
Haven't seen this on usenet so far. Wonder if its more torrent prone.
redrove 2 hours ago||
Got this in my sabnzbd instance and had to do .exe rules there too. An exe in a linux container…very smart.

I’m as upset as OP, get a job skid.

bhaney 2 hours ago||
It's by far the most common on public torrent trackers, but I occasionally see it on usenet too. Never bothered to check which indexers they tend to come from.
sporedro 49 minutes ago||
Is this a joke? Who’s upvoting this? It should be titled “I didn’t even bother asking an LLM to configure my server”
bstsb 40 minutes ago|
the interesting element of the article for me wasn't "somebody put malware on a torrent site", it was how the author reverse engineered the .exe to see why the file ended up there
internet2000 16 minutes ago||
How the author *asked Claude to reverse engineer the exe
comrade1234 2 hours ago||
Tell your downloader (in my case qbittorrent) to not download .exe, .scr, .zip, etc, etc, etc. It’s been this way for years. You do have to clean out qbittorrent every few days so that sonarr will search again, so that’s a pain. But hey, I’m pirating media. Someone trying to scam me at the same time is expected.
alt227 20 minutes ago||
> Tell your downloader (in my case qbittorrent) to not download .exe, .scr, .zip, etc, etc, etc.

This is literally one of the advice points at the end of the article. Did you get that far?

c-hendricks 1 hour ago|||
Plenty of my iso's intentionally contain those names though. Really, sonarr / radarr should have implemented this a long time ago since they're the ones doing the searching, downloading, and inspecting of files: https://github.com/Sonarr/Sonarr/pull/8775

Using settings on the indexer isn't great since with Prowlarr the user doesn't actually interact with the indexer portion of Sonarr.

Doing it in release profiles by bumping down their score is a cute workaround but then the torrents will just stop saying ".exe" in their title.

Really it's a thing Sonarr have to do, as evidenced by the multiple PRs they have to try and finally do it.

Dylan16807 12 minutes ago||
The setting works on filenames, not titles.
queenkjuul 2 hours ago|||
Join a private tracker and never think about it again
serf 2 hours ago||
yeah!

let's all join a private tracker!

that'll fix the problem, the bad actors won't chase the crowd, and it definitely wont end in a burning of the library of alexandria loss-of-history what.cd style event again and again if the public can't archive it.

/s

how about we just create an exe/bat/com exclusion on our dumb-as-dick media downloaders like sensible people have been doing for 30+ years?

47282847 49 minutes ago|||
> a burning of the library of alexandria loss-of-history what.cd style event again

I don’t agree with that framing.

All metadata has been preserved and published, and the sucessor sites to what.CD have long outgrown it; and their successors will again. Anything you find missing, you can request and typically it will be filled within less than 24 hours.

queenkjuul 1 hour ago|||
I mean i just joined a private tracker and so I don't have to think about it. Several, actually. It's hard for me to imagine someone taking torrenting seriously enough to set up an arr stack and not belong to a private tracker. Beyond malware, there's the rightsholder spies on the public trackers, and I'm not trying to lose my ISP over copyright strikes.

And i also truly cannot understand what your point is. Trackers are not really legal, they come and go. I don't think a few hundred or even a few thousand HN users joining across the ecosystem is going to suddenly cause them all to get raided

yborg 2 hours ago||
Yeah, this whole post felt like some weird deja vu from 25 years ago on a web forum. "Bastards are putting malware exe's on file sharing, wtf??"
hparadiz 2 hours ago||
This has been a thing since torrents have existed.
LoganDark 1 hour ago||
> But you put the address in the malware anyway so what's the point for fetching from Gist and YouTube????

The ability to change it, dude. Have you never written a malware before?

Often a primary concern is the security response, so you want redundancy for the ability to work around enforcement action, such as website takedowns.

Hardcoding a scapegoat into the malware itself also buys you time, so that the first enforcement action is less likely to spend your backups right away.

> And to whoever made this: you probably spent weeks or shit ton of tokens on ChaCha20, AES-CTR, runtime API hashing, anti sandbox scoring, Chrome app bound encryption bypasses, just to make a shitty skid malware.

People have been making infostealers that support hundreds or thousands of different apps and corners of your computer for decades. Plenty of vendors pride themselves on it.

Meanwhile you used LLM to write a bunch of your article, and seemingly to do the RE too...