Top
Best
New

Posted by AIorNot 5 hours ago

Codex Desktop continuously generates Crashpad pending dumps(github.com)
41 points | 23 comments
jbellis 47 minutes ago|
this looks like a bug, but even normal happy-path codex creates many GB of logs, openai apparently considers this fine bc it's been going on for months

two things help:

1. fs-level compression, I use ZFS bc Btrfs has massive contention problems with concurrent Rust builds

2. Archive your old sessions using something like sessionwiki (https://github.com/youdie006/sessionwiki), I've integrated this into my control plane (https://github.com/BrokkAi/mjolnir/)

AgharaShyam 13 minutes ago||
look into ~/.bun/install/cache/@openai folder as well.

for some reason I had 11 separate codex and codex-code-mode-host binaries in mine. each weighing about ~300 MB.

glenngillen 1 hour ago||
I'd been running into a lot of disk pressure on my system from agents running. I discovered two main causes:

- my approach to using git worktrees for all work. Not entirely surprising, the duplicated build artifacts in each worktree being the main culprit here. There were some limited gains to be had by just being more efficient with how builds were managed but ultimately I just had to limit the number of concurrent features I was working on in a couple of particularly large repos.

- more insidious was the fact I was actually hitting memory limits more than I realised and causing my mac to have to swap heavily. The system was surprisingly still quite performant while this was happening... until it wasn't. Unfortunately as best I can tell the only "fix" when this happens is to restart the machine. There's no way to have the system reclaim any of the swap space once it's written to disk. Which if you have it thrash a couple of times a day (especially easy if you leave something running overnight) adds up very quickly.

singularity2001 1 hour ago|
switching to copy on write worktrees is the biggest game changer it should become common knowledge pretty soon and it's already available on most operating systems
aaronbrethorst 1 hour ago||
I've been making a lot of use of DaisyDisk over the past year: https://daisydiskapp.com
piskov 57 minutes ago||
Mole is ok too

TUI version is free, though there is a paid app if that’s your thing

https://github.com/tw93/Mole

columk 34 minutes ago||
Yeah mole is brilliant, I just discovered it days after paying for Daisydisk and haven't used Daisydisk since. Mole freed up 80GB on my laptop the first time I ran it.
rudedogg 1 hour ago|||
DaisyDisk is such a nice app. I just checked and I purchased it over 11 years ago.

They still update it, it works perfectly, no version 2.0 forced obsolescence. Just a nice, reliable tool.

clumsysmurf 56 minutes ago|||
DaisyDisk is great. Mole also found and deleted a bunch of stuff on my mac from Claude, Gemini, etc.

https://github.com/tw93/Mole

madaxe_again 1 hour ago||
I’ve been using it altogether too much this last month and just bought a 4TB USB4 SSD.

And yes, codex is eating my disk, too. Ironically my solution is mostly codex - I have a task which goes around stomping on detritus.

piskov 56 minutes ago||
btw there is a storage section in Chatgpt app settings, showing used space on disk and other related stuff
matt3210 1 hour ago||
Good example of SLOP coding from openAI. No wonder they cant keep agents from committing felonies.
AIorNot 5 hours ago||
If OpenAI's super-intelligence can solve Navier-Stokes why can't they fix this stupid bug that ate up 330GB of my Mac's disk space? come one please triage your github issues?

See this: https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/25921#issuecomment-62...

aleph_minus_one 50 minutes ago||
> If OpenAI's super-intelligence can solve Navier-Stokes why can't they fix this stupid bug that ate up 330GB of my Mac's disk space?

Because the former can be marketed very prestigiously, the latter hardly can.

According to https://www.briefia.fr/en/article/openai-revendique-la-resol... it is estimated that solving Navier-Stokes did cost OpenAI 40 million USD. I would bet that if OpenAI spent the same amount of money using its super-intelligence to fix this bug, this would work.

But seems not to be very economical. :-)

cyanydeez 2 hours ago||
because they'd need to pay a real mathematician to verify the proof they claim.
kudokatz 52 minutes ago||
Are we really surprised that stuff like this happens with AI slop?
adamddev1 1 hour ago|
Imagine if the vibe-coders get their way and we see this level of bloat and bugginess at EVERY level of the software stack. Everything would collapse.
sick_of_slop 57 minutes ago|
[dead]