Top
Best
New

Posted by AshleysBrain 8 hours ago

Facebook Pages require paid subscription to post more than two links per month(mastodon.gamedev.place)
399 points | 360 commentspage 4
mcmcmc 4 hours ago|
Probably an unpopular take, but this is not a bad thing. Maybe weird on it being for link sharing, but it’s always been deeply anticompetitive to offer a free webpage. It’s bad for the market for them to set the price of hosting a webpage for a business at zero, and the network effects make it easier for them to lock businesses in
margalabargala 4 hours ago|
That's not what this is though.

If your facebook page were your hosted website, everything's fine and dandy. Cost is still zero!

This move punishes people who do have their own website that they are paying for, and also have a facebook page that links to the main site.

mcmcmc 4 hours ago||
Right, but my opinion is that they should charge everyone. This is at least a step in that direction. It’s not “punishing” anyone, it’s making just making it more clear that instead of money they want you to pay with engagement. Apparently 2 links a month is enough of a loss in engagement that the marginal cost of hosting their page outweighs the value Meta gains from having that business on the platform for “free”.
mightyham 8 hours ago||
Is this not a good idea? It makes average users more selective about what content they are sharing, and reduces scam/bot content that can currently spam post links for free.
SwellJoe 8 hours ago||
Facebook knows what you want to see, because you can follow pages and individuals. They choose to show those scam/bot posts to you anyway. This isn't to fight bots.
NicuCalcea 8 hours ago|||
Facebook actively courted publishers so they'd post links to their content on their pages. Now they want to charge them for the privilege.
jimbokun 7 hours ago||
First hit’s free.
afavour 8 hours ago|||
Very few spam/scam posts I see rely on external links. FB is an all in one scammers paradise. This just seems like a transparent attempt to keep people on platform.
rambambram 6 hours ago||
What do they rely on then?
magicalist 8 hours ago|||
This is for Facebook Pages, not for users. Average facebook daily user can keep posting 35 links a day to their favorite slop site.
bluGill 8 hours ago|||
Those 35 links to "you wouldn't believe which politician wants to kill our kids now" type posts are why I quit facebook. There is value in know what my friends are doing, but the negative value of that hate isn't worth it.
Ajedi32 8 hours ago|||
I wish there were a way to filter links and reshares out of my feed completely.
cma 8 hours ago||
If it is for that reason and not a money squeezing/enshittification thing, it seems like a big admission their feed algorithm doesn't work.
stared 7 hours ago||
It has been disincentivising links for quite some time, so more opinions and fluff, fewer quality posts and links to external materials.
sirnicolaz 8 hours ago||
So happy. All the fake news will cost much more now. Best case: less shit-links going around. Best case 2: Facebook closes down. No worst case.
decisionSniper 6 hours ago||
What about the well funded nation state actors? They'll just buy ad's and keep blasting away.
fg137 5 hours ago||
I think they can afford to pay $50 a month.
verelo 7 hours ago||
Curious how this affects the api. Feels like a big breaking change which I’ve heard nothing about.
jstummbillig 8 hours ago||
Those free and open models though
binlog 7 hours ago||
Title isn’t fully accurate. This is specifically for business pages. You can still post links on your own profile or groups.
DataDaemon 8 hours ago|
They just want kill small web and keep people on their platforms.
More comments...