Top
Best
New

Posted by AshleysBrain 10 hours ago

Facebook Pages require paid subscription to post more than two links per month(mastodon.gamedev.place)
413 points | 374 commentspage 7
wg0 10 hours ago|
This is last stage capitalism of these tech platforms.

Nothing much left to innovate.

ChrisArchitect 10 hours ago||
late 2025: Facebook tests £9.99 monthly subscription for sharing more than two links https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46314668
omoikane 9 hours ago|
Interesting how 9.99 GBP (about 13.36 USD) will allow for "more than 2 links" in 2025, but 14.99 USD now will still only allow for 2 links. Users will need to pay for "advanced plan" at 49.99 USD per month just for 8 links.

https://www.facebook.com/help/1929252614431792/

vivid_aijoy 44 minutes ago||
[flagged]
sergiotapia 10 hours ago||
They are in the squeezing what's left position for that platform. Young kids think of facebook like we think of myspace. Social media as a platform in fact may just be over. my kids don't really use social media, they use whatsapp/iphone groups.

in fact... maybe kids think of instagram as a boomer unc platform now too.

SoftTalker 9 hours ago|
While it's been longer-lasting than many, social media is a fad and all fads eventually decline. Fundamentally it doesn't do anything that can't be done in a group chat. Thanks to the "forever memory" of the internet, people have learned the risks of posting anything where it will be scraped and preserved for eternity, ready to haunt you when it's most awkward.
partiallypro 8 hours ago||
I could understand this for new pages, to crack down on spam, but for established pages? It makes no sense at all. As a cash grab, I get it, but it's not sustainable. Though maybe they are trying to crack down on pages taking over feeds, which I would support...but that would also require them cracking down on the AI slop pictures, etc in feeds.
apt-get 10 hours ago||
World Wide Web, huh?

Those hyperlinks ain't free, you know.

xigoi 9 hours ago||
Of course they’re not free for Meta, as they allow people to access other sites than Facebook.
elevation 10 hours ago|||
> World Wide Web

Embrace, extend, extinguish

10111001 10 hours ago||
They need to introduce postage for messages.
alex1138 9 hours ago||
So... what

We have the internet and that's not good enough

You already throttle posts - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14147719

You already act as a piss-poor communications medium https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4151433, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6090712

Is "Metaverse" open web/open protocol? Or just yet another way for Zuckerberg to fuck people over?

rambojohnson 5 hours ago||
dogshit platform.
micromacrofoot 9 hours ago||
Can we just stop using Facebook as a defacto business/organizational page? come on people. I've been login-gated from what should be public pages for the better part of a decade now.
xp84 7 hours ago|
The problem is that it’s the only thing slightly webpage-shaped that is free and extremely easy to make/edit. (Yes, I know that it I’m putting the bar extremely low because it’s an incredibly limiting platform)

You or I could put up an html site and host it on Cloudflare Workers for a total cost of 0 + the domain reg. But mom and pop don’t even know what html is and are too cheap to pay $500 (and some ongoing cost to a local “we build and host your website” firm to do it.

They could probably pay for Squarespace and just tell an AI “here’s a Word doc of my menu, build me a site for my restaurant” but Squarespace just isn’t free.

atmfees 2 hours ago|
[flagged]
More comments...