Top
Best
New

Posted by pavel_lishin 20 hours ago

Today, we hacked what we'd set out to hack: the iPhone(blog.calif.io)
910 points | 593 commentspage 6
Imustaskforhelp 19 hours ago|
Slightly offtopic but I find it slightly funny that they have accomplished to hack the iPhone yet the name of the third video is: Can you iPhone do this?

I would like to think that they might've created the video so fast and perhaps out of so excitement that the name of the title had the typo :-D

zb3 20 hours ago||
Too bad this will be patched instead of allowing the device owner to control their own device.

Of course it's better that they found that before some shady mercenary spyware company, but I'd also want to control my ios device the same way they did in the video, but no, that's not for us.

layer8 19 hours ago|
In principle it should be possible to jailbreak-patch the OS so that it will patch any patches to your liking.
zb3 18 hours ago||
So you think they will release the full exploit?
NamlchakKhandro 17 hours ago||
In this thread. Apple Acolytes Anonymous.

Seriously, California has a cathedral problem, may the vault dweller succeed.

aftbit 18 hours ago||
Now - does the Signal 1-click work on Graphene?
bozdemir 15 hours ago||
public wont be getting this jailbreak, it is just another flex like elon's flipping car.
nalekberov 20 hours ago||
I think we will probably see more and more restrictions on frontier models in the coming months. This is not what behemoths like Apple and Sony want to see.

Paradoxically, people are happier to buy things that they have control over, but boy, Apple loves to control every layer of consumerism.

kam 19 hours ago||
Apple doesn't want security researchers to find bugs? Then why do they have a $2m bug bounty?
nalekberov 19 hours ago||
Awarding security researcher != Average Joe being able to jailbreak your device.

Hope you understand the difference.

torben-friis 19 hours ago|||
If the current frontier allows for this, we can probably expect alternative models to reach the same spot in a matter of months as well. The cat's out of the bag, for better of worse.
doc_ick 16 hours ago|||
Do we want everyone who doesn’t know how to program a car to reprogram their car? I.e. I think there should be restrictions on frontier models to ensure safety of others.
phn 19 hours ago||
The paradox is that if the models are restricted, more exposed software will exist. I'm not convinced you can make a model that allows you to build secure software without it also being able to build exploits.
getcrunk 14 hours ago||
First of all this is crazy that even on hn we were a few days behind this.

Second fuck Apple. Fuck all tech companies. And seriously fuck late stage capitalism. Foss or nothing. There should be a rule if you pay for it it has to be foss. This way people can still make proprietary but they just can’t charge for it.

We have zero privacy, zero security, all our politicians and all the corporations are against us.

Media parsing is an endless exploit vector. Like fuck. At some point you have to be like they (not just Apple) keep it broken

An yea I know foss gets these issues too. But if the only option was foss, then at least the whole world’s focus would be on it

CH-Abhinav 19 hours ago||
Bro rewrite IOS in Rust :)
Humberd 4 hours ago|
[dead]
More comments...