Top
Best
New

Posted by laurenth 9 hours ago

Lula wins election after final votes tallied(www.reuters.com)
408 points | 426 commentspage 4
willmadden 5 hours ago|
Lula used a justice he appointed to order polling stations to stay open past the agreed upon deadline without consulting the courts that are supposed to rule on election matters. That's election interference. I'm not convinced the population is going to see him as legitimate after that stunt.
dkga 5 hours ago||
Brazilian here. It was unprecedented but not unreasonable, given problems with availability of public transportation in a number of locations. Both sides asked for extensions, although in different places that would favour their own bases. A nationwide extension was the best option, even if it was semi-botched due to the time it was decided. Also, the vote difference between Lula and Bolsonaro was much larger than any additional voting would have delivered.
mbStavola 5 hours ago|||
Bolsonaro also sought extra voting time as well. He wanted it done only in certain states but it was granted nationwide. He was very involved in this process and is now crying foul because it wasn't done in a matter exclusively favorable to him!
motionlessveloc 5 hours ago|||
Heaven forbid more voters get to chance to cast their vote!

And FWIW Bolsonaro was also asking the polling stations to stay open longer.

gorgoiler 5 hours ago|||
It’s a tough position to fight for: “Lula only won because too many people voted for him!”.

I think you are equivocating. Denying people their vote indeed counts as election tampering but that doesn’t mean giving more people the vote is also bad.

gverrilla 5 hours ago|||
Flavio asked for the same thing. Stop spreading fake news.
willmadden 5 hours ago||
What I wrote happened. It's not "fake news". What remains to be seen is which polling stations remained open and which did not. This election may need to be annulled.
cesarb 5 hours ago|||
> What remains to be seen is which polling stations remained open and which did not.

You can check it yourself, the output and log files for each ballot box are already available. I can see that mine opened and closed at the expected time.

sampli 5 hours ago||
[flagged]
leandrod 7 hours ago||
An opaque, illegal system. Brazilian law states votes must be counted publicly.
matheusmoreira 7 hours ago|
And now, any hopes of a paper trail have been permanently laid to rest.
raphaelcosta 3 hours ago||
Everything was fine when Jair Bolsonaro won, and even during the first round of this election. The logic here is crazy!
matheusmoreira 3 hours ago||
I've always defended the paper trail. I'd be defending the paper trail even if Bolsonaro had won today.

There is no contradiction here. When it comes to elections, there should be exactly zero room for doubt.

matheusmoreira 9 hours ago|
Deeply unfortunate, but not entirely unexpected. Lula was allowed to do every "electoral crime" they barred Bolsonaro from doing in 2022. They even extended voting time, a move that directly benefiting him, and also ruled illegal back in 2022.

Gotta look on the bright side. Bolsonaro was closer to US interests than I'd like. If the elected right wing senate manages to at least impeach some supreme court justices next year, I'm going to be OK with this.

I submitted the news too and it got flagged:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50237256

johntitor23 9 hours ago||
Please don't share half the context.

Many cities had their mayor cancelling free public transportation and stopping people from going voting. Extending the time is a reaction, not a first action. Furthermore, the ask didn't come just from Lula's party, it came from both candidates [1].

2022 Brazil had the Federal Police Director actively interfering with transportation as well.

[1] - https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/eleicoes/o-que-diz-o-codigo-ele...

matheusmoreira 9 hours ago|||
Busses with a Lula insignia on it? That's an electoral crime, and probably why they were stopped from circulating. Just yet another one to the list.

They called for extension back in 2022 too, and it was ruled illegal. "Everybody had the chance to vote", said Alexandre de Moraes.

lenkite 1 hour ago|||
[dead]
lukan 9 hours ago|||
"They even extended voting time, a move that directly benefiting him"

Both candidates supported that decision.

bakies 9 hours ago|||
Both sides asked to extend the hours. The court took the action. I don't really know brazillian politics and what happened in the past but thought I'd point that out.
matheusmoreira 8 hours ago|||
Abstainees were thought to be the biggest source of new votes for Lula in the 2nd round of elections. I think such a move benefited Lula far more than it did Flávio.

It's also inconsistent with the court's own precedent. Extending voting hours was deemed illegal back in 2022. "Everybody had the chance to vote", said Alexandre de Moraes.

After Lula lost in the 1st round, suddenly it became legal again. The irony is not lost on me. That's the pattern with the leftist judges in the courts. The supreme court judge who decided it used to be Lula's own lawyer.

ImPostingOnHN 5 hours ago|||
If it was illegal, then why did Bolsonaro ask for it to be done in this election?

If Bolsonaro did not want it done in this election, then why did Bolsonaro ask for it to be done in this election?

matheusmoreira 5 hours ago||
Bolsonaro's father asked for an extension last election. Don't remember why. Denied, illegal. "Everybody had the opportunity to vote".

Bolsonaro's son asked for an extension this election due to heavy rains in the south. As far as I can tell, it was also denied.

Lula asks for an extension this election due to busses being grounded because Lula-aligned syndicates slapped Lula insignias on them which is an electoral crime. Lula's former lawyer turned supreme court judge approves it.

It is obvious that the Brazilian institutions, and these judges in particular, wanted Lula to win. They were going to be impeached otherwise.

Rapzid 2 hours ago||
Both candidates wanted an extension.

Court agreed, they didn't feel everyone had a chance to vote this time. Approved. Legal.

This seems hard for you to wrap your head around for some reason.

matheusmoreira 2 hours ago||
Funny how they always agree when Lula wants something.
Rapzid 41 minutes ago||
I guess, humor is subjective after all.
idontwantthis 4 hours ago|||
How are you posting so fast? I usually get blocked after five in an hour.
matheusmoreira 4 hours ago||
Sometimes dang applies a rate limit to accounts. I used to be rate limited as well. I would often get in arguments about stuff such as copyright.
lenkite 1 hour ago|||
[dead]
armchairhacker 9 hours ago|||
What are the other crimes? Extending time would rarely be bad, and it seems both candidates approved it.
matheusmoreira 8 hours ago||
Back in 2022, Lula's party used to be against Bolsonaro's "digital militias". They engaged everybody they had in the superior and supreme courts in order to censor it all. It was disgusting.

This time around, some guy in Lula's party created "Lula's Army", a channel with millions of people in it. Suddenly, it was fine.

They used to cry about "fake news" and call for censorship at every opportunity, and they'd get it because they own the courts. Now they were the ones spreading "fake news" of all sorts. Did they get censored? Nah.

Censorship in Brazil is unconstitutional, by the way. Political censorship is doubly so. It doesn't matter, because they own the supreme court.

There are no laws in Brazil, there is only what the supreme court wants. Whatever they write on a piece of paper becomes law, and police obeys it. They are the true seat of power in this country.

cowlevel 8 hours ago||
It sounds like they have tried a tactic, discovered that it does not work, and switched to a different tactic which works. Isn't that exactly what they should do?
matheusmoreira 8 hours ago||
Absolutely. Do you have nothing to say about the obvious censorship, though? Consistency demands that they too be censored, since Bolsonaro was censored back in 2022. Censoring the right and letting the left run free is precisely what led to January 8th.
cowlevel 7 hours ago||
Is censorship good or bad?
matheusmoreira 6 hours ago||
I don't condone any form of censorship, for any reason. Brazilian constitution is also clear and unambiguous: censorship is unconstitutional, and political censorship doubly so.

The selective application of unconstitutional "fake news" rules, which were made up on the spot by the supreme court judges aligned with the left: is it good or bad?

Lula and his party spread a truly absurd amount of "fake news" between the 1st round and 2nd round of presidential elections. Why are they allowed to do it while the right was censored?

gtirloni 9 hours ago|||
> submitted the news too and it got flagged

Please review the HN guidelines:

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

matheusmoreira 8 hours ago||
I was just linking it for completeness. My submission was flagged, but this one wasn't. Guidelines don't explain the difference.
spolitry 9 hours ago|||
This is a very confusing comment. Most on this side don't know the insider informing the Brazilian elections, and we only know the public news

Can you explain?

You are right winger but don't like the Brazilian right wing aligning with the US right wing, but do like the politicians who are aligned with the US right wing?

matheusmoreira 9 hours ago||
I'm kinda trying to move past left/right labels. I'll try to explain.

Bolsonaro generally supports privatizing Brazilian state companies and selling them off to foreigners. I don't want that. Especially not to the US and Israel.

Lula on the other hand is better aligned with China, which is also what I want.

Lula and myself are aligned on these two points. So this outcome is not entirely bad for me.

The problem I have with Lula is his party's obnoxious taxation, lack of a real plan for reindustrialization, continuous defense of criminals, and most importantly, his total domination of the supreme court. I voted for the right specifically to see those judges impeached and imprisoned, because I absolutely oppose everything they did in 2022, far more than I ever opposed Lula himself. I'm of the opinion that presidents and elections barely matter anymore, because it's the supreme court that runs the country. It's the Venezuela governance model: president appoints god-like supreme court judges and rules monocratically through them.

The 1st round this month was such an upset not because of Bolsonaro but because of the senate. They are the ones who can impeach supreme court judges, and when Brazil unexpectedly elected a right wing majority in the senate, it struck true fear into the court. This was our chance to completely wipe out that court and forever change the history of this country, like Bukele did for El Salvador.

While in the end the necessary victory didn't materialize, Brazilian senate is still absolute majority right wing now, and they could still impeach those judges. I'm not going to hold out hope for that anymore, but if I see at least one judge bite the dust I'll still call it a major win.

khriss 3 hours ago||
> I'm kinda trying to move past left/right labels.

And yet, somehow 100% of your posts are repeating debunked Brazilian right wing propaganda. How curious.

matheusmoreira 3 hours ago||
I have been here for over ten years and have posted over eleven thousand HN comments, only a fraction of which are about politics. If you think I'm some kind of Russian bot account, you couldn't possibly be more wrong.

Also, "debunked" is debatable. I don't accept your portrayal of extremely complex issues as settled, and I also don't accept "official" explanations of anything. I always try to reach my own conclusions and form my own opinions.

I came here to discuss my viewpoints in an attempt to find truth for myself. If you don't want to help with that, then kindly don't reply to me again.

khriss 2 hours ago||
Someone else said it far better than me here last year, so I'll just leave it at that

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44948769

epolanski 9 hours ago|||
Why unfortunate?
thatsnogood123 9 hours ago|||
Bolsonaro-aligned mayors deliberately blocked busses from running that would take people to the polls in Lula-supporting neighborhoods. Emergency legal decisions allowed voting times to extend as a response to this. By the margin of votes, it wouldn't have mattered.
matheusmoreira 8 hours ago||
Busses with a Lula insignia on it, which is an electoral crime.
netsharc 3 hours ago||
Ah yeah, the serious serious crime of having stickers on busses...

Just as bad as storming the capitol!

matheusmoreira 3 hours ago||
Personally, I don't consider it a serious crime at all, or even a crime.

However, it is an electoral crime to do things like stamp public transport vehicles with a party insignia to "remind" candidates who provides for them. As such, it's not at all surprising that the busses were grounded.

Rapzid 2 hours ago||
Wow, yeah. Someone should totally find the people responsible and let them know how criminal they were. Super top priority.

Also it's a good thing people were afforded more time to vote in case their buses weren't running.

It would be sad for a Bolsonaro voter to not be counted because some cheeky rapscallion stickered a bus.

Thank goodness both candidates sought extension and it was granted.

matheusmoreira 1 hour ago|||
The point is the busses weren't grounded maliciously in order to deliberately stop people from voting. There is an actual reason why it happened: Lula's supporters slapped Lula stickers onto the buses, which is an electoral crime.
epolanski 1 hour ago|||
I think you're missing the point, while not a serious offense it is still an offense and tampering of the electoral process.
Rapzid 47 minutes ago||
I don't think I'm missing the point at all mate. The point is to insinuate some conspiracy bull cock and I'm calling bull cock.
tomcam 9 hours ago|||
> Lula was allowed to do every "electoral crime" they barred Bolsonaro from doing in 2022. They even extended voting time, a move that directly benefiting him, and also ruled illegal back in 2022.
spolitry 9 hours ago||
Letting cirixes vote in elections is bad?
subw00f 9 hours ago|||
Closer to US interests? What a joke. Better luck next time, I guess.
matheusmoreira 8 hours ago||
I don't get it. Are you agreeing with me?
diego_moita 8 hours ago|||
Lula and Bolsonaro are two sides of the same coin: a stupid tribalism were each side feeds on the hatred for the other.

Both will lead the country to pork-barrel, corruption and government paralysis by debt. Both are "unfortunate".

There are 2 solutions for all Brazilian problems: Guarulhos and Galeão. The rest is just circus.

matheusmoreira 8 hours ago||
Yeah, I agree completely. I didn't vote for any of these candidates, I voted to impeach the supreme court.

There is exactly one politician that once upon a time represented me: Dr. Enéas Carneiro. Ironically, his ideas were closest to the Chinese Communist Party. He's dead now.

The left wing has PCO, a real left wing party, and I agree with them on a daily basis. They're shunned by everyone, and were even persecuted by the supreme court along with the right wing.

I'm increasingly resigned to the idea that immigration is the only option by now.

MrBuddyCasino 9 hours ago|||
[flagged]
Telaneo 9 hours ago|||
Saying HN is leftist is an insult to anyone with actual leftist beliefs.
subdude 9 hours ago||||
You guys always make moderate to center left politicians sound so much cooler than they really are.
l-mdev 8 hours ago||||
[dead]
platevoltage 9 hours ago|||
Oh no, not the hammer and sickle! Cover your children's eyes!
762236 8 hours ago|||
[flagged]
matheusmoreira 8 hours ago||
[flagged]
free_bip 9 hours ago|||
The amount of mental gymnastics people will do to support fascist dictator wannabes is truly insane. For your sake I hope you find reality.
lenkite 9 hours ago||
It was extremely amusing. Brazilian election law generally sets 5 p.m. Brasília time as the deadline for closing polls. The judge who made the emergency ruling to pause counting and extend voting hours by 2 hours was Cristiano Zanin Martins - Lula's former personal attorney. The same guy who Lula nominated to the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil in June 2023.
anderber 9 hours ago|||
Both candidates agreed to it. Please stop.
lenkite 1 hour ago||
[dead]
canadiantim 9 hours ago|||
Yeah it’s alarming how much HN users are willing to support corruption so long as it’s their preferred candidate doing it. Really is all just tribalism to most posters in this thread so far
cowlevel 8 hours ago||
How is letting more people vote corruption? I'd say it's corruption whenever anyone can't vote.
matheusmoreira 8 hours ago||
Everyone had more than enough time to vote. The courts said that verbatim back in 2022. Why change opinion now?
cowlevel 7 hours ago||
Last week my mom said we didn't have any orange juice. This week she said we have orange juice. Why the change?
Rapzid 2 hours ago|||
She must corrupt. Is the door dash driver her ex personal attorney?
matheusmoreira 6 hours ago|||
You think a supreme court judge, who was once the candidate's lawyer, ignoring his own court's precedents, to try and help said candidate, is in the same conceptual space as your mom being confused?