I would like to see how it breaks, don't spend all your focus on how nice it looks with specially curated shots. At least give a few examples of what happens when it breaks from running too long. They mention that it can fail under "Understanding current limitations" but don't show any examples. Especially since they mention the cases of safety and responsible use, it seems quite relevant to help prepare people by showing them some examples of how it can break and so you an learn to spot it.

Again, very impressive from a technical point. But language is so flawed to do anything creative. It just turns out all looking the same and kind of boring

In the first comparison of Genie 3 to Genie 4 it seems that:

- in Genie 4 the character's suit stopped making sense in the back where it now has a weird fold?

- the controls don't control the character even anymore as now its controlling some kid-height character in first person instead?

- Everything looks like Unreal Engine.

This does not look good.

I highly suspect that Genie is being made primarily for internal use, and access is more to gather feedback/training data and a bit of PR.

> Google AI Ultra exclusive

> AI Ultra (and thus Genie) are not available for Workspace companies

Who is this for?

Q: Is there a easy way for average people to recognize these live super-deep fakes?

I know I could run the content through a fingerprint detector. However, I'm a professional software engineer...not a normal user.

What's the ethical impact of this technology??

What is the point of this vs cheap robotic arm simulations?

The only place I see this applicable is for visual artists prototyping

The future of movies will be promising.

[1]: https://www.minid.net/2026/8/2/the-actor-was-the-expensive-p...

We’ve come a long way from simulating a Unix file system in a GPT-3 prompt haven’t we?