Would love to see what other things could benefit from this beyond storage. Maybe like BT or similar wireless.

This project is vehemently against AI usage of any kind, so I can trust that the contents of this post has been checked and written by someone who has read the code and knows what they are doing.

> The Linux io_uring interface allows the user to submit one or more I/O operations to the kernel, which are then processed in an asynchronous fashion without blocking the userspace process. Redox, being a microkernel, handles I/O in userspace scheme processes rather than in the kernel.

io_uring is incredibly fast for async I/O but is also a massive security disaster in the Linux kernel. As long as Redox is able to show a secure interface for async I/O the better. Likely part of their long term goals for the OS.

> While it has substantially improved over the years, IPC is still quite slow on Redox, and this is important to optimize as ring buffers can only offset this overhead to a certain extent. This has been a focus of our work to improve system performance.

I quite like this targeted and thoughtful approach for a wholistic improvement starting with ring buffers in redox. They need to compare the async executor benchmark results with Linux and continue from there for improvements.

> The optimization made here is that the kernel zeroes the vector registers if the caller and callee entered the kernel through syscalls, rather than saving/restoring (using vzeroall, ldmxcsr etc. as required for correctness).

Interesting approach for complete correctness over performance in this area and this tells me that they are not taking going to risk on overlying on rust's "guarantees" to help them prevent races or data reuse after free bugs in the Redox kernel.

One of the most technically sound and researched posts I've read, but unfortunately it has been buried under low effort slop posts on HN.