Why do vihecoders still care of other people's software?
Why stop at just one?
If you care about software (or math, or art, or literature, or any other aspect of human creativity), AI is at best like hiring someone to solve jigsaw puzzles for you.
You complain an the shit future we're building. Someone says fuck you to your dystopia and starts explicitly weeding it out, and you call it backwards.
I just feel like eliminating LLM output is (1) not feasible (2) not the right solution to the problem.
My bet is that we end up building an awful outcome for nearly humans, which means that trying to put a stop to it is a duty, even if it's likely to fail. I feel the same about climate change -- it's likely that we're going to fail to keep much of earth habitable, but it's not morally acceptable to stop trying.
Ignorance won't help us. I agree with the negatives, I just feel like this approach is backwards.
There's no good endpoint for people if AI succeeds, it's that simple. It doesn't matter how many people get to roast marshmallows as the place burns.
Fucking get over yourself.
They are really very insecure people, professionally and socially.
EDIT: It took one second for an AI patrol to downvote this one.
user: 1ajsht
created: 2 minutes ago
karma: 0