Top
Best
New

Posted by Tiberium 22 hours ago

Binance-hacker-1029 – $5.6B stolen from Binance(arkm.com)
1707 points | 1182 commentspage 13
Founderarcstone 18 hours ago|
never thought this could happen
lestertomlin 17 hours ago||
At this point whenever I see these I just lol
freecodeio 22 hours ago||
oof
asxndu 18 hours ago||
EIP 7702 is the most idiotic EIP.

It's the main weak point used in these hacks.

It allows a counter party to withdraw money from your wallet any time.

Just don't "connect" you wallet.

ashishkaloge 16 hours ago|
[flagged]
AznHisoka 20 hours ago||
I’m sorry but why did anyone have any money in binance in the first place? Didnt their cofounder get in trouble (but not imprisoned) for some shady stuff awhile back?
ceejayoz 20 hours ago||
He was briefly imprisoned (a couple of months). Later pardoned.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cly1qrl9l1qo

andy81 20 hours ago||
"Pardoned" with implications of bribery, as opposed to being found innocent by a court.
mcmcmc 19 hours ago|||
He was convicted of laundering billions of dollars for Iran and Russia, then bought enough Trump coin for a pardon
tonetheman 19 hours ago||
[dead]
bethekidyouwant 21 hours ago||
If you were active in crypto exchanges since the beginning what is the chance you already lost it all in a major hack?

Not a serious store of value.

hangrybear666 20 hours ago|
Luckily for me, I lost all my coins very early on Mt Gox so the lessons were learnt and mistakes not repeated (which means exiting crypto, watching the show in amusement)
silver92bullet 19 hours ago||
Is the biggest heist in history?
DonHopkins 14 hours ago||
Barron Trump probably stole it.
sgt 11 hours ago|
That's actually not as unlikely as you'd think.
scrlk 22 hours ago||
[flagged]
thewanderer1983 19 hours ago||
Top post on /r/cryptocurrency Good to see all these organic posts across social media.

MelangeBot OP • 2h ago Their insurance fund (SAFU) is completely wiped out, it's only $1 billion in BTC

The name of the fund was originally inspired by this meme

FWIW, at the end of every crypto bear market, a CEX usually blows up (eg FTX)...

N_Lens 18 hours ago|||
Dead internet
randysalami 16 hours ago|||
I’m sorry to say this is not dead internet.
SecretDreams 17 hours ago|||
Don't worry, we're well moderated and free of bots here.
N_Lens 15 hours ago|||
[X] Doubt
avazhi 15 hours ago|||
If ever there was proof that this site doesn't do sarcasm, this comment being downvoted is it.
N_Lens 12 hours ago|||
Neurodivergent people have trouble detecting irony and sarcasm.
forgetfreeman 15 hours ago||||
If you think that's wild you should see some of the stuff that gets flagged to death on the front page.
SecretDreams 8 hours ago|||
It's okay. The downvotes give me a good pulse for where this place is at these days.
huey77 18 hours ago|||
Came back here to see if i was seeing double
schleck8 22 hours ago|||
> As of 2026, the SAFU fund comprises crypto assets valued at approximately US$1 billion, held entirely in Bitcoin

And decreasing, since BTC is dropping as we speak. Always a good idea to hedge a currency with the currency itsself

echoangle 21 hours ago||
> And decreasing, since BTC is dropping as we speak. Always a good idea to hedge a currency with the currency itsself

Depends on what you’re insuring, no? For theft, it actually makes senses, right? That way, you’re insuring a constant number of coins, no matter what the market is doing. If you’re insurance currency would tank during a bitcoin heist, you would lose the insurance effect.

refulgentis 16 hours ago||
[flagged]
miohtama 20 hours ago|||
Stablecoins are frozen so the hole will likely be around two billion dollars.

Binance has equity and cash flow cover this, outside the insurance fund.

They custody $150B.

FTX was larger in dollar terms and ecosystem was smaller back in a day.

rootedbox 19 hours ago|||
This might sound good.. but freezing currencies is bad. It evaporates trust of liquidity from whoever is doing governance. It's part of the reason why the bond market is doing what its doing lately and why countries are on-shoring gold reserves.
fragsworth 17 hours ago|||
That sounds kind of ideal, but I feel like their actions might have been justifiable.

If a massive heist like this triggered a run on one of the largest exchanges (Binance), potentially leading to a liquidity crisis, the consequences for the ecosystem could be far worse than temporarily freezing specific addresses holding stolen stablecoins.

Not saying that's what would have happened, but it seemed like a real possibility. And I'm not saying freezing assets is good in general, but in this particular case, maybe it was the lesser evil.

idiotsecant 16 hours ago||
No. Permissioned cryptocurrency is all the horrible parts of cash and all the horrible parts of crypto put together with none of the advantages of either.

I want crypto because I don't trust nation states with the leverage and dials of fiat currency. All we've done is replace government with trusting whoever made a particular stablecoin.

Permissionless crypto is the only real crypto.

dboreham 15 hours ago||
All cryptocurrency is permissioned. This is because governments can make it illegal for someone to turn your cryptocurrency into real currency. You need their permission to turn it into pizzas and yachts.
edwinfredy 15 hours ago|||
Only if you wanted to turn it into fiat currency for the transaction, right? If the yacht seller would take payment in crypto, you need no government’s permission, right?
SAI_Peregrinus 15 hours ago||
If the yacht seller would take payment in cocaine, surely the government wouldn't prohibit the transaction…
edwinfredy 14 hours ago||
Surely the government would get in the way there, but holding cocaine is also illegal, not just transacting with it. If the government went that route, they'd have to ban all crypto outright.
idiotsecant 7 hours ago|||
I think the point is that you stop caring about the fiat part of it at all. Government ownership of fiat currency is not a natural feature of the universe, it's just something we did for a little while.
paulpauper 19 hours ago|||
governments freeze currency all the time.
rootedbox 16 minutes ago|||
In mass the US has only done it with Iran.. but during the past 2 administrations.. Russia, Venezuela, Afghanistan..and we've also disconnected Russia from the banking network.. This has really spooked markets and governments. Because this means at any time the US could just be like.. you are out of the banking system and we hold your money now.

Which is why if you hold Russian bonds you are screwed.. which caused a cascading long term effect and why now all bond markets are affected. And all countries are bringing there gold home from the USA.. they now know in a total collapse of the system they need their gold in their vaults.

that being said crypto currency traders are not trading a currency but some weird version of Pokemon cards so who knows what's good or bad for them.

lazide 19 hours ago||||
Name one anyone trusts.
cyanydeez 19 hours ago||||
definitely not the ones I keep track of, eh.
nradov 19 hours ago|||
[flagged]
mirashii 19 hours ago|||
The primary reserve currency does it all the time. https://ofacblockedfundslawyers.com/us-sanctions-freeze-doll...
nradov 18 hours ago||
That's different. They freeze individual accounts subject to legal orders. They don't freeze the whole currency.
platinumrad 18 hours ago|||
Is that not what is happening here?
mirashii 16 hours ago||
It is, thus the links being to individual wallets.
idiotsecant 16 hours ago|||
You literally made a reply to a person making this exact point ...
Forgeties79 17 hours ago||||
> Only the shithole countries

Seriously?

tarpitt 18 hours ago|||
Well maybe it could happen with actual reserve currencies, but it certainly doesn't happen with platinum level, diamond tier luxury fiat currencies.

Oh you didn't know? I bet you trade in "dollars". That's cute.

weakened_malloc 18 hours ago||||
they borrowed ETH against the stablecoins on AAVE before they were frozen
pigeons 17 hours ago||||
Doesn't matter how much they custody!
jazzyjackson 19 hours ago|||
Uh don’t you not want to cover losses with customer funds?
pbhjpbhj 17 hours ago||
Put some pyramid in that blockchain?!
ahartmetz 16 hours ago||
Recursive pyramids!
anonymous908213 21 hours ago|||
> Changpeng Zhao (CZ), former CEO of Binance, tweeted "Funds are safe"

Seems like the issue here is that he became former CEO. Funds are not safu without him...

Animats 15 hours ago|||
Another guy pardoned by Trump.[1]

[1] https://people.com/trump-pardons-changpeng-zhao-binance-cryp...

sensanaty 19 hours ago||||
> Funds are safe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DelF6zEHXpE

thenthenthen 17 hours ago||
The accent makes no sense
svanegmond 7 hours ago||
Why would it
thenthenthen 4 hours ago||
Points are made
lxgr 22 hours ago|||
Do you mean bull market?
scrlk 21 hours ago|||
It's a (weak) bear market capitulation signal - max fear when people think everything is broken.
incompatible 20 hours ago||
It seems like bitcoin, currently 78719, was only 58526 on 30 June. That's 34.5% up in four months, meeting the definition of bull market.
kimixa 20 hours ago|||
Bitcoin is volatile enough you can cherry-pick pretty much any %age you want based on the dates you choose. Which you seem to have done here - "happening" to choose the day with the lowest single day value in the last 3 years for your comparison point.

For another narrative, it was 83,038 a month ago on Sept 29th, so is down 5% in one month. And one year ago it was 112,562 on Oct 29th 2025 - down over 30% in one year. Well into "bear market" territory.

Using "traditional" market indicators and definitions for things like bear/bull markets doesn't feel sensible for such a volatile market.

incompatible 18 hours ago||
Fine, but the comment "It's a (weak) bear market capitulation signal" is inapplicable, either because defining bear/bull markets doesn't feel sensible, or because it's not currently in the capitulation stage of a bear market, but some way off the bottom.
paulpauper 19 hours ago|||
it will be sub 50k soon probably. a weak rebound already losing air
paulpauper 19 hours ago|||
already over. a tiny bounce after falling 55%
razodactyl 19 hours ago|||
Wait. How does the insurance fund run significantly lower than the primary?
computerfriend 17 hours ago||
Fractional reserve banking but for Bitcoin.
Cyclone_ 21 hours ago|||
But when FTX blew up crypto went down even further..
koolba 20 hours ago|||
You mean FTX?
Cyclone_ 20 hours ago||
Yes, typo.
paulpauper 19 hours ago||||
much more was at risk as a percentage of market size, market was in worse shape,
nullc 19 hours ago|||
Though in that case the crash was directly due to "effectively altruist" SBF fraudulently dumping customer assets in a half-brained and presumably stimulant-addled attempt to manipulate the market and reduce his liabilities.

Not making any market predictions here-- just saying that it's probably not that useful to generalize from that event.

Cyclone_ 18 hours ago||
I think the point is more that when something bad happens in markets it creates fear, which generally leads to downturns (for at least some time).
dist-epoch 21 hours ago||
The insurance fund is not for covering hacks.

Binance is making so much money, covering this hack is peanuts for them.

thechairman12 20 hours ago|||
Not to be too pedantic, but with some napkin math, I don't think this is true. Looking for clarification!!

I downloaded Binance's self published market data (https://data.binance.vision/), calculated spot and futures volume for the past year, and then applied their *highest fee tier* on both sides of the volume (for every $1 traded, they generate a fee on the taker and the maker. the fee rate is asymmetrical).

Spot revenue worked out to $7.6B USD, perps revenue worked out to $13.8B

This is an upper bound on the fees charged on volume. Binance also scams their users with a b-book, has DMM deals, etc.

I don't want to get into all that today.

But the final result is that they print somewhere in the range of $20B per year on fees. I guess CZ also has huge stockpiles of BTC and stuff. A 1% rise in BTC price probably means more for them than their actual fees, LOL.

All this to say, I think $5.6B significantly hurts.

See Google's stock price today. Their ads business slowed down a bit, and their stock tanked 10%. If binance was publicly traded, I imagine a similar affect would be demonstrated on their price.

yreg 21 hours ago|||
How much money do you think they are making? Because I really doubt this is peanuts to them.
throw-qqqqq 20 hours ago||
Binance has a market cap just shy of $100B, so a $5.8B sure hurts, but it’s not a showstopper I’d say.
grey-area 20 hours ago|||
A market cap predicated on the price of bitcoin. A market cap is not funds available, it's just the valuation of the market, which is fickle.
gizajob 16 hours ago||||
Market cap has nothing to do with free cash to absorb a $6billion loss. Money is also going to pour out of Binance now, one would imagine.
throw-qqqqq 13 hours ago||
> Market cap has nothing to do with free cash to absorb a $6billion loss

I agree. My wording was imprecise. I was trying to give an idea of the size of the company/ecosystem, using BNB’s market cap as a proxy.

As Binance doesn’t publish their financial statements, it’s difficult to get the more relevant metrics, like FCF.

basilgohar 17 hours ago||||
It really hurts when there's this much misunderstanding of market cap vs. revenue. P/E ratios exist for a reason.
throw-qqqqq 13 hours ago||
What an arrogant assumption! I know the fucking difference between market cap and revenue.

I also know Binance is a privately held company that doesn’t publish financial statements. If you can tell me their P/E, go right ahead.

Not that I think P/E would have much use here. P/E is a relative valuation metric (how cheap/expensive).

The relevant metric would be something like FCF, as gizajob wrote, but again: not available.

I was trying to give an idea of the size of the company, that is all.

12_throw_away 17 hours ago||||
boss: did you just send $5B of our company's liquid capital to a nigerian prince?

me: no worries boss, our market cap is $100B

boss (who is also the tooth fairy): oh right cool np

antonvs 15 hours ago||||
That $100 billion is exchange holdings, i.e. customer funds, not market cap. It would be highly illegal for Binance to use any of that $100 billion to cover this loss.
thatguy0900 18 hours ago|||
That's assuming these AI hacks stop, right? Why would they, ever?
EGreg 22 hours ago|
how do we know? it could be nonsense...
evdubs 22 hours ago|
https://x.com/cz_binance/status/2115915423174853077

> It does look like a hack on Binance. Appreciate the quick freeze from Tether (~$971m) and Circle (~$823m).

DavCreator 22 hours ago||
https://xxcancel.com/cz_binance/status/2115915423174853077
More comments...