Top
Best
New

Posted by eggbrain 1 day ago

Ask HN: What's your current AI agentic setup?

I'm curious how people on HN are using AI day to day, and came up with a list of questions I thought could be interesting to know. No need to answer every question of course, just wanted to get a gut feel how people are using AI.

1) What AI subscriptions are you personally paying for? (Claude, ChatGPT/Codex, Cursor, etc)

- Which tiers?

- Have you purchased multiple subscriptions from the same provider (eg two Claude accounts)?

2) Are you using models outside (or instead) of those subscriptions? For example, pay-as-you-go APIs, OpenRouter, or locally hosted models.

- Which models and providers?

3) What coding harnesses and interfaces are you using? Are you sticking with the default CLIs or IDE integrations, or using alternatives like OpenCode, Pi, Aider, Muse Code, or custom-built harnesses?

- What made you switch harnesses (if you switched)?

4) Are you using any agent orchestration or swarm tools?

- For example, Munder Difflin, Gas Town, Ruflo, or something custom.

5) Are you using broader agent platforms like OpenClaw / Hermes Agent / Grok bot / Dots / Muse?

- If you are using them, what are your main use cases?

-----

I know my workflow has differed significantly from a year ago, and so it would be interesting to capture a snapshot today of what people are using and why.

451 points | 525 commentspage 5
m_w_ 2 hours ago|
1. Claude Code (Ultra) + Codex (Plus) 2. Yes, but not for coding. In my experience Opus 5.5 is the only model I'd code with now, but other tasks (especially when not subsidized / part of product) use many other models. Latest deepseek checkpoint is very solid 3. CC + extensive config / hooks 4. Usually supervising myself w/ 5-6 sessions, if orchestrating more than that it's a hand-rolled swarm tool 5. Tried NanoClaw, and I have access to Claude Duet, but between getting on and off the waitlist for Duet, I hand-rolled a personal agent that does what I want.
julesrms 2 hours ago||
I'm on a Claude and a GPT plan, with occasional Deepseek, GLM and other models for testing.

I work on cross-platform apps, so need to run things on a PC as well as my Mac. To make it less faff to switch between them, I run Juggler (https://github.com/juggler-ai/juggler) on both. Juggler treats local and remote sessions the same way, so I have both machines set up with the same two windows, one for the PC and one for the Mac. That means I can move seats between them and have the exact same two windows controlling each machine wherever I am..

Outermeasure_A 2 hours ago||
1) No subscriptions

2) I self host a Q4 quant of GLM 5.3 flash, at work using Antigravity and Gemini Argon

3) Vanilla Pi cli and running in a VM. I customized it to work around common LLMism, like intercepting and modifying requests or tool calls.

4) Pi is my agent orchestration, it can run in headless mode recursively. Also most of the things the agent UIs provide can be done via writing to shared files to disk

5) No

dcferreira 1 hour ago||
I have a $100 claude subscription and a deepseek account though I haven't used it much. Just today I published a blog post about my setup [0], but the TLDR is vanilla claude code (and sometimes oh-my-pi) with an Obsidian vault.

This week I started using Herdr also, and while I don't yet have it setup as I'd want, it's slightly better than me previous pure tmux setup to manage multiple agents. I also always turn on remote control on claude so I can control it via the app.

I suspect the gas towns and similar are no longer a necessity: I think as the models get better, the organization structures need less attention. I've been doing fine with, for each project, spinning up just one manager to manage all the relevant sessions and ping me when I'm needed. Or if I want to be hands off I get a pm and a tech lead claude sessions up, and the pm moves the work forward while the tech lead makes decisions on what to work on next and how to tackle it. This is in spirit a similar thing to gas town, but incredibly simplified. I don't think this would work with claude 3.5, but with 5.5 I'm quite happy!

[0] https://dcferreira.com/post/2026-10-how-i-use-agents/

decoding 14 hours ago||
I'm personally primarily using Claude Opus 5.5 via Claude Code on a Pro subscription. In my timezone I seem to get an incredible amount of usage equivalent to about 2 full working days per week, letting it do all the coding but focusing it frequently. It blows me away how good it is and how much usage they are giving us.

At work I'm afforded a Claude subscription that is 5x that much usage and I simply cannot use even half. I'm not coding at all anymore at work, just driving Claude. It only needs a bit of direction.

I also use OpenRouter with OpenCode, and a homegrown harness I wrote initially without AI help but later on with AI help. But I haven't used this setup for a while. I swapped models based on the churn as reported by artificialanalysis.ai but they don't release as much data via their free API anymore.

I also can run Qwen 27B A3B on my NVIDIA 5060 Ti 16GB but I don't bother with that anymore either.

I don't use orchestration or swarm. Occasionally Claude spawns a few sub-agents as it needs more data and is preserving it's context window.

wj 2 hours ago||
1. $20 tier for Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google.

2. Use OpenRouter for some agentic work and for using GLM 5.3 for some security reviews.

3. Mostly the model harnesses (desktop apps for business and personal tasks and cli harnesses for coding). Use pi with openrouter.

4. My thesis is that one-time work (creative, coding, etc.) is different than on-going repetitive work--the work of the back office. I've built a platform for the latter specifically around centralizing agents while decentralizing orchestration. (https://sleeperservice.io/)

5. Waiting on a Duet invitation. But Dots is interesting to me. Use Gemini with Gmail to some extent.

ct0 1 hour ago||
One of those lenovo Mini pc running Ubuntu (plex server) that was just sitting idle. I installed tailscale and Claude code on it and run rclone with my Google Drive if I need to review docs on the go. I ssh into it from my iPad.
nfriedly 3 hours ago||
My day job has a Claude account, but for personal projects, I have been playing with different models and environments on my home server. My current setup is Qwen 3.8 Flash Next, Strata, and OpenCode/OpenChamber.

I already had a bunch of my projects on the server with with code-server (VS code in a browser) set up to access it, so switching between code-server and OpenChamber is just switching tabs.

However, I've mostly been managing it from my phone - the OpenChamber app is awesome. I still switch back to my laptop occasionally - it's a better interface for reading and writing code, and also the desktop OpenChamber app has a built-in browser that it can manage, which comes in handy.

Oh, and separate from all that, I have Facebook muse set to automatically lower prices on a couple things I have on FB marketplace.

willio58 16 hours ago||
Claude 100$/mo for personal projects.

Opus 5.5 for 99.9% of tasks. Fable for the rest.

Harness: Claude Code plugin for VS Code. At some point I guess I'll switch to just the claude code app but tbh this is super ergonomic for me.

No agent orchestration besides literally just letting claude spin up agents for me.

No broader systems.

And I'm _massively_ productive with the setup I describe above. I say this not to gloat, I'm sure others have great methods but I do say this in case anyone is feeling overwhelmed by the options out there. My 2 cents is don't overthink it.

reddalo 16 hours ago|
I'm a complete newbie on this: how do you make Claude spin up other agents? And what do all those agents do separately?
sillysaurusx 15 hours ago|||
For example, say you want to search for bugs in 100 code files. Ask Claude to “use subagents to look for bugs across these files” and it will likely spin up 5 agents, each taking a different section of the codebase. Theoretically in the limit case this is 5x faster than Claude doing it without subagents.

Any kind of problem shaped like map reduce can be accelerated this way: Looking through your banking records, searching through a database, asking Claude to find that one weird file you remember from three years ago but forgot where you saved it, etc.

Just know that there’s no quicker way to hit your limits than to use subagents. So use them if it’s paid for by your work or whenever you need the 5x speed boost.

reddalo 7 hours ago||
Thanks for the explanation. I'll give it a try whenever I need to do something similar.
willio58 15 hours ago||||
You can tell it to do so, but what you'll find is it knows to do it when it needs to. This is another case of "don't overthink it". Just let your agent decide when spinning up sub-agents makes sense.

If you focus too much on optimization, and you do so in the wrong ways, you'll actually find you saved no time/money/tokens vs just letting it decide when to do it. This applies as much to Agentic engineering as it did with programming pre-AI.

tl;dr it will literally do it for you, and it'll tell you when it does so

mholm 16 hours ago||||
You tell it to spin up subagents, they do whatever the parent told them to do, usually a segment of a task you gave it.
mceachen 10 hours ago|||
"use subagents as applicable" (and maybe "use sonnet for simpler tasks")
reddalo 7 hours ago||
Thanks. The Sonnet part is smart to save tokens.
gszr 2 hours ago|
I use xAI and OpenAI subscriptions, switching between them, even mid session, using my Lunar harness: https://github.com/gszr/lunar. This is a very productive setup for me. As it also supports API keys, I throw in other models in the mix when I want to play around. I have not incorporated an orchestrator in my workflow, but I can see the appeal.
More comments...