Top
Best
New

Posted by rbanffy 4 days ago

AMD expects to outsell Intel in Q4 for the first time in history(www.tomshardware.com)
593 points | 223 commentspage 2
dlcarrier 4 days ago|
AMD specifically calls out high sales of Instinct products as leading the sales growth. I wonder how their Epyc and Ryzen lines compare to Intels Xeon and Core lines. AMD's Instinct sales are practically nothing compared to competing Nvidia products, but no one† buys Intel Arc accelerators, so that may be the main reason AMD is beating intel.

†Disclaimer: I own an Intel Arc GPU

asimovDev 4 days ago||
do people / businesses even buy Xeons anymore? Any used server from the last 5 years I see is always EPYC and all VM services I see are EPYCs unless something ancient that is still on a Xeon E5 from like 2015
adrian_b 3 days ago|||
There are many years since AMD's EPYC CPUs have been greatly superior to Intel's Xeons and Intel has not succeeded to match them (Intel has a hope with the future Diamond Rapids Xeons, which are their first CPUs since 2019 that have a good chance to match AMD's).

In the last few years Intel's division that makes Xeons had huge losses, because in order to retain their big customers they had to accept to sell at big discounts, otherwise the customers would have switched to AMD.

All has changed this year, due to the AI craze.

AMD has sold all the server CPUs that it could make, within its allocations at TSMC. Everybody who did not succeed to buy EPYCs has bought Intel Granite Rapids Xeons, because they are not made at TSMC, but in Intel's fabs, so they did not compete with other TSMC customers for allocations.

So Intel has also sold every server CPU that they could make, and they are now trying to retool some fab that made new Panther Lake CPUs back to the obsolete Intel 3 CMOS manufacturing process, in order to make more Xeons, to sell them as long as this huge demand persists.

Thus in the last quarter both AMD and Intel have sold less consumer CPUs than in the past, because all who could did delay their upgrade plans due to the unacceptable memory prices, but on the other hand both AMD and Intel had record revenues and profits from selling server CPUs.

jack_pp 3 days ago|||
Last I tested about a year ago in Google cloud the best Intel vs best AMD same machine config otherwise, video transcoding speed was practically identical.
aclmakes 3 days ago|||
my non tech neighbors and cousins have 10 year old computers. they buy them like their car. they run them both until it wont turn on. and when they break, they will only spend $500 on the next one.

and that's fine. just surprised the hell out of they still used a black friday special laptop from 10 years ago. that thing is special alright....

justsomehnguy 3 days ago|||
Yes. On a second hand market. Anything before LGA4189 is dirt cheap and there is no EPYC machines here at all.
FuriouslyAdrift 3 days ago||
More than half of all server CPUs are AMD. They absolutely domininate in HPC and servers (and have for years, now).
dlcarrier 3 days ago||
2026Q2 numbers show Intel falling quickly but still in the mid-60% to 70% in every market: https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/desktop-cpu-...
FuriouslyAdrift 3 days ago||
AMD was at over 46% of the "server" market 1Q2026.

Intel isn't even condered a player in HPC anymore. 147 of TOP 500 is AMD (it's really custom chips, which AMD also does with it's Xilinx and Instinct divisions, and nVidia that are chewing up the Intels)

dlcarrier 3 days ago||
AMD has practically abandoned their HPC-focused Threadripper series too, leaving the market segmentunmet by anyone. The supercomputers in the Top 500 listing only account for a fraction of CPU sales, where they mostly serve to feed accelerators.
guerby 4 days ago||
ECC
p1necone 3 days ago||
The vibes I'm getting are that x86 is on its way out - apple switched, and mainstream laptops are releasing with fast snapdragon chips - I'm thinking both Intel and AMD risk becoming obsolete if they keep focusing on x86 chips.

Anyone with insight into the industry know how much institutional knowledge would be relevant still with an ISA switch?

p1necone 2 days ago||
There's mostly people disagreeing with me in the comments, so I'll make a concrete prediction.

I reckon 5 years from now it'll be obvious that x86 is on its way out, and 10 years from now it'll be replaced by ARM in all but narrow backwards compatibility demanded use cases.

I also predict that the survival of both Intel and ARM as big players in the market is contingent on them switching in the same timeframe. If they don't, they're dead (of course, if they try to switch and botch it, they're dead too - but baking that into a prediction feels a bit no-true-scotsman esque).

I'm hopeful that manufacturers will ship regular socketable ARM cpus just like they do with x86 now, but who knows whether that will be the case or if we'll move more towards everything being soldered on all in one solutions.

layer8 3 days ago|||
Windows-on-ARM market share seems to be stagnating at a low-ish single-digit percentage, I don’t see it overtaking x86 anytime soon.
aclmakes 3 days ago|||
hearing that google switched to arm for their servers because it was much more efficient for compute vs power used per space is what made me finally think everything might be switching to arm. it took apple a bit of time to switch over, software growing pains for users early on, but my gosh have their products just continued to take off.

so now mobile, desktop and server all looking good with ARM? i can't see why it would go backwards at all.

trynumber9 3 days ago||
Not really getting that impression from AMD. On the call Su talked up EPYC "Venice" (a series of x86 chips) as a major component of their Q4 and 2027 guidance.
p1necone 3 days ago||
That's what I'm saying - I think both AMD and Intel risk becoming obsolete dinosaurs if they keep focusing on x86, which is what they seem to be doing.
trynumber9 2 days ago|||
But it's selling well for them? I'm not sure I get the problem.
p1necone 2 days ago||
Every once ubiquitous dead technology was selling well shortly before it wasn't, so not sure what your point is here.
pjmlp 3 days ago|||
Windows on ARM is hardly going anywhere, and outside HN bubble, Windows x86 has a worldwide market share of 70%.

Also beware of what you wish for, that is basically the end of PCs when it comes to be, the dream of OEMs, going back to fully vertical integration as all computers used to be in the last century, with exception of PC clones, thanks to IBM failing to control the ecosystem.

mepian 3 days ago||
Before IBM PC there was the open ecosystem of the S-100 bus.
pjmlp 3 days ago||
There was, how well did it take off versus the Apple, Acorn, Atari, Amigas, C64, MSX, ZX Spectrum of the day?

It didn't, other than in some niches.

2OEH8eoCRo0 3 days ago||
AMD relies on geopolitically dicey Taiwanese fabs. Why is nobody else worried about this? Berkshire divested all TSMC investments a few years ago so at least they're worried.
amosbatto 3 days ago||
Those same "geopolitically dicey Taiwanese fabs" are used by almost every major chip company in the world, including Intel which uses TSMC to manufacture its Panther Lake graphics tile and all the tiles in Arrow Lake except the base tile. Nvidia, Apple and Qualcomm are just as dependent on Taiwanese fabs as AMD.
FuriouslyAdrift 3 days ago|||
TSMC dominates world wide with 80% of the general chip market and nearly 100% in some specific markets.

Due to Trump policies (and geopolitical realities), they are building or helping to build fabs in the US and elsewhere. It's takes years to build a fab.

NekkoDroid 3 days ago||
This reminded me to check about ESMC (joint venture between TSMC and Bosch, Infinion and NXP, but mostly TSMC) since I haven't heard about it in a while. Seems they are on schedule which somewhat surprises me.
aclmakes 3 days ago||
if openAI starts making their own jalapeno chips, maybe intel gets a comeback printing the jalapeno chips for openAI? because a new worry for intel and AMD is going to be when openAI and anthropic just design all their own hardware, and dont need any of the "historical expertise" those companies have. so then the only value is "who has the physical value that can make these designs".

so intel took the hit now, AMD might take the hit later as they're kinda...... mostly a software company, that contracts to hardware companies.

wmedrano 3 days ago||
This is surprising news to me, for some reason I assumed AMD has been outselling AMD for at least the past 5 years.
gnabgib 3 days ago|
> for some reason I assumed AMD has been outselling AMD for at least the past 5 years

Technically impossible. Hmm.. do you mean Intel > AMD. nVidia > AMD. nVidia > Intel. AMD > Intel.

wmedrano 2 days ago||
Lol, oops AMD > Intel. It must have been my bubble. I was on Ryzen in 2018. In 2020 I queried a few cloud servers I had access to and they seemed to be using EPYC CPUs. I basically had no exposure to Intel CPUs until my recent Panther Lake laptop.
JudahNyquist 3 days ago||
makes sense, look at $INTC vs $AMD, I have been and always will be an AMD fanboy
shevy-java 3 days ago||
And both drove up the RAM prices.

I want my money back.

jxie2004 4 days ago||
[flagged]
Choad_202611041 2 days ago||
[dead]
neuroelectron 4 days ago|
[flagged]
pachouli-please 3 days ago|
Ryzen and EPYC have been doing crazy kickflips since around 2018 in both value and performance. Since Ryzen 3000/Zen 2 things hit parity on IPC generally, and Ryzen 5000/Zen 3 and beyond has just been total crush mode. Especially after 3d cache was intro'd.
ahartmetz 3 days ago||
For me, it was core count, price and energy efficiency (especially after a hefty power limit reduction that costs barely any performance). Intel made faster single cores most of the time, but at ridiculous power consumption and lower total core count.
overfeed 3 days ago||
Zen 1's $/perf was so good. After I booted a freshly-unboxed Zen box and ran some benchmarks for work (RIP on-prem server rooms), I bought a bunch of $AMD at the next market open, for about $12 IIRC. It's shocking to me it took almost a decade for AMD to outsell Intel, the value proposition was evident on day 1.
thisislife2 3 days ago||
Intel has always been better at marketing and sales than AMD. I'd say, it still is and that continues to be AMD's weak point. In my opinion, it should be doing better than it is given the state Intel is in currently.