Top
Best
New

Posted by kenrose 18 hours ago

Conductor is joining Meta(www.conductor.build)
189 points | 203 comments
Charlieholtz 17 hours ago|
Hi! Co-founder here. Conductor actually kicked off with a HN post many lifetimes ago in July 2025 (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44594584). I owe so much to this community. Thank you all so much!

The whole team is around to help answer any questions. You can reach out to me personally at charlie [at] melty.sh.

kylecazar 14 hours ago||
"... many lifetimes ago in 2025"

This made me laugh. The world is different now. Congrats!

jahala 17 hours ago|||
I'm in the awkward position of wanting to congratulate you and scold you at the same time. Wish you'd been bought by Anthropic or something instead. Anyhow- congrats on getting scooped up.
breznev 17 hours ago|||
What value could they possibly provide Anthropic? This is by far the best-case scenario for the team
jahala 17 hours ago||
A great, stable product - that doesn't try to be absolutely everything - but does a few things really well, and looks great while doing it?
ipaddr 13 hours ago|||
That's not Anthropic.
dbbk 10 hours ago|||
Conductor is really no different from Claude Code Desktop now, aside from multiple harness and models
swaptr 7 hours ago|||
To my understanding Muse has finally caught up to Anthropic, OAI and others atleast on coding and other benchmarks. This move makes the most sense to now quickly try to capture the market.
temp123477 14 hours ago|||
You lads... I remember when we had to paste the code from the chat window into VSCode.
steve_adams_86 8 hours ago||
Remember when 200k was a HUGE context window, but you still had to be precious about how many files you'd paste into it?
999900000999 14 hours ago|||
Are you going to retire now and start a band ?

Congratulations, getting an exit in a bit over a year is very very good

sksum 9 hours ago|||
Best shipping speed I've experienced for a product like this. Great run!

Consider Open Sourcing the core/app

apsurd 7 hours ago||
im so curious what specifically makes this possible. I have no experience with conductor but your comment reminds me of how impressed I was with the development speed of parse.com. I'm likely dating myself; it was the first serverless/firebase backend concept that supported mobile app development. I wasn't even a user I just noted how prolific the feature rollouts were. So polished too. They got acqui-hired by Meta and I'm sure the founders did well.

Anyway, for anyone reading, just a not developer-led products. How do they do it?!

gadders 3 hours ago|||
Not a user but congrats and I hope you make fat stacks.
yard2010 3 hours ago|||
I loved the autographs at the bottom. It gives a nice feeling. Way to go!
ckx 3 hours ago|||
Congrats! This is only the beginning of your journey!
adam-eclse 17 hours ago|||
Just wanted to congratulate you guys. Like many of us here, I had a mixed reaction of happy for your team, but also sad for Conductor. I tried a bunch of different approaches for coding agents, once I started using Conductor I was like "oh I guess I'm done looking for a harness" - a beautiful clean UI, great UX and just an overall smooth experience with all the features you could need.

Hopefully Meta does something good with your team's talent and technology, but regardless, it was a huge productivity boost for me and I really appreciate that. Good luck to you and your team at Meta!

hridyaagrawal 2 hours ago|||
congrats to the team!
jasonjmcghee 11 hours ago|||
Congrats Charlie!
Swalden123 17 hours ago||
[flagged]
brainless 10 hours ago||
I really fail to understand what is going on here.

There is literally no moat in most software expect the users a product has acquired. The number of slightly different solution to an existing product is wild. And this is getting crazier. I build for the fun of it now. Completely lost any sight of $ goals.

I am building agents, have own gui framework, own server orchestration, and now looking at deploying multi-app servers using unikernels. I build for my niche audience and make them happy - I am going via my existing clients who are in the property management domain. Non technical folks who have to handle everything from inspection to finance. My ideal type of folks.

I am sure by the time I build my end to end agent/orchestration/deployment/management system, I will have some customers and many more clones. Slightly different clones. This is the future. Why would anyone acquire anything?

They need my prompts, not my tech.

sksum 9 hours ago||
Companies acquire talent ;Companies acquire products with a fast-growing usage base ;Companies acquire products that can help them beat competition in a fraction of the time it would take to build internally (in decreasing order of "real value" and increasing order of self-deception)

I feel its less about the tech and more about the stage Meta and Conductor are in, right now

potamic 9 hours ago|||
In this case they're shutting down the product, so it's definitely not for the product or for the user base.
chrisgarand 7 hours ago||
That's not necessarily true. They can be using it to jumpstart their own desktop app.

I don't see a Muse desktop app, this gives them something they can spin up in a few weeks, not months, with native cloud integration. I'd guess we're going to see a product competing with OpenAi/Anthropic (as far as standalone apps are concerned) by January.

walthamstow 5 hours ago|||
100%. I'm seeing it as a repeat of the VS Code fork wars. Funnily enough, nobody won that war. The paradigm disappeared entirely.
brainless 6 hours ago|||
You mean that desktop app is not something I can spin up in days with my tiniest of LLM budgets?

I do not know where people are lost these days. I build ambitious apps with 3x $20 subscriptions. And I live in a village in eastern Himalayas. People are really in a bubble.

LLMs have crushed the idea of "using [another product] to jumpstart" anything. Just build it.

coded_monkey 4 hours ago||
Yes you can build it in a single prompt, but you miss the 93 versions of iterations and thoughts of the developers who've already made the project. If you have the money, why not buy a product/team that already has a year of experience with real users instead of reinventing the wheel?
brainless 4 hours ago||
That is your assumption. I am not talking about one-shot. I mean that lots are people are going through more iterative development cycles than ever in the history of software. Just my own examples (100% agent written)

https://github.com/brainless/nocodo, https://github.com/brainless/dwata, https://github.com/brainless/akar, https://github.com/brainless/baho

All these and more, from a single engineer with 3 x $20 subscriptions. While I also run chicken and pig farms. It will take time for people outside tech hubs to understand what LLMs enable.

cgio 3 hours ago||
Not that I don’t think there’s amazing things that can be built easier, but designing and building a product is more than writing the code. Look at where you spent effort for your own examples. There’s a skill there which goes further than just reverse engineering an existing solution, and that skill is obviously of value to Meta. People were going crazy for the price they paid for instagram some years ago I remember.
brainless 9 hours ago|||
These were true in pre-LLM era. Cursor is a good example. Big numbers but what is the value in a year?

Sure they had a lot of growth but when there are a 100 alternatives, each offering something a bit different, then user bleed is natural.

Meta, Google and all big co will spend more $ short-term to buy and they will continue to bleed till the new playbook sets in the minds of execs.

sksum 8 hours ago||
talent it is then;

both acquihires and products will get cheaper, could the new playbook be the OG marketplace ?

altmanaltman 7 hours ago||
I mean okay but you're looking at two very different things. At your description, it makes no sense to acquire your business. But Conductor is not building for a niche audience and is a radically different beast. Even before this acquisition they raised over 20 mil. You're using very naive thinking when you're talking about value here, its not as simple as why buy a company when someone can vibecode it. This is particularly funny because its usually AI labs that are following through with some of the biggest buys lately.
brainless 6 hours ago||
Why do you think how I am building is not going to be the norm? Software is going the way of plumbing. Pick a tiny niche, build highly customized workflows and sell to them. Global products finding audience across 100 countries is no longer working.

Raising money was not an indicator of value before LLMs but it helped a lot. I have been tech lead of a couple US based seed-funded startups and I definitely see the value.

But most software has no intrinsic hard engineering these days. A few do. Companies raise money because they feel they will grow into a large user-base. Then, either make money or get acquired. Where is "value" here? Its VC-speak all the way.

Privately funded AI labs in the US are buying, yes. I highly doubt this trend will go on when the return on investment starts fading. There is momentum in executives. The "value" is how they used to see things. Takes time to update.

altmanaltman 1 hour ago||
Nobody's wrong or right. It's just comparing apples to bananas.
markerz 18 hours ago||
Things will shut down over the next few months. https://www.conductor.build/announcement:

    Wednesday, Nov 4 New users can no longer sign up for Conductor or download the app.

    Friday, Nov 13 Conductor Cloud goes read-only

    Local Conductor will continue working as normal for now. It will start winding down in early 2027.
Flashback to Cloudflare acquiring Deno and hiding the shutdown at the bottom of their announcement -- https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50019911.
harlequinetcie 30 minutes ago||
I think this is the sad part about it.

I wonder what would be the way to protect OSS like this from this kind of end?

It's a great win for the team, but many will be looking into other solutions for a while.

fn-mote 11 hours ago||
Months? More like weeks.
iamunr 17 hours ago||
Literally just went to go "all in" on conductor yesterday, and buy into their cloud setup and hope the company keeps going.

And today we're doing a refund + moving the org to t3.codes instead.

Boo Meta. Boooooooo.

pjmlp 27 minutes ago||
It is kind of interesting on how only the buyer gets booed.
jerpint 2 hours ago|||
If you’re interested in self hosting your own, I’m the creator of woltspace [0], it’s a fully open-source way of managing your team of coding agents (wolts). You give the wolts a lodge on your own infra. They’re always on, always reachable, and fun beavers and racoons that evolve over time. Happy to chat about it! It’s by far my favourite workflow as a dev who loves tmux and being in a terminal

[0] https://github.com/jerpint/woltspace

dregitsky 11 hours ago|||
(disclosure: I'm a founder of yet another T3/Conductor competitor, https://boxes.dev)

You might want to do a quick eval of all the products in the space vs your org's needs! There are a lot of options now, and T3 isn't really a drop-in replacement for Conductor if you wanted the cloud setup.

Specifically T3's great for local, but for cloud they don't host anything - you just run their server on your own machine / VM. Which works ok, esp if you prefer full self-hosted, but then parallel agents still share a machine and need worktrees for isolation. Conductor Cloud actually eliminated worktrees by giving each workspace its own VM with a dev environment preloaded - which is the same approach we (and a few others) are taking.

chrisvalleybay 5 hours ago||
Also you're not mentioning that Boxes is not open-source, where as T3 is. They just had to leave Conductor essentially because it was an acquihire of a closed source offering. I think if we're to stay safe in an environment that's moving this fast: we do need the code so that we can continue using it in case of these M&A's.

Also - if you are a developer/SWE this 'keep your laptop closed' thing with these control planes is mostly hype. I'd place my bets on something like Rex (https://www.superlogical.com/) instead.

paaloeye 17 hours ago||
[flagged]
sgallant 17 hours ago||
Theo's awesome!
rolymath 6 hours ago|||
Theo is the reason I signed in to youtube on my living room TV so I can block his channel.
Handy-Man 17 hours ago||||
He is just annoying, otherwise he is fine.
frde_me 14 hours ago|||
As annoying as he can be, t3 code really speaks for itself, especially with the later updates
qsfp28 12 hours ago|||
[dead]
dbbk 10 hours ago|||
He's a narcissist
stevenou 17 hours ago||
Extremely bummed about this. Having cloud webhooks + workspace/session API + isolated VMs has been a massive productivity boost for me.

Does anyone have suggestions for products that can match Conductor Cloud, not just Conductor Local?

ibrahima 12 hours ago||
We've been building https://www.superconductor.com/ since before Conductor had cloud (actually, technically before Conductor was released, so the naming is a funny coincidence). Our team's been working together for over a decade across multiple startups (and one prior exit) and we put pride into building an excellent multiplayer, multi-surface, mobile-friendly experience so teams can work together with agents anywhere on any project. Give us a look and let us know how it goes!
dregitsky 14 hours ago|||
We built https://boxes.dev specifically for cloud dev / isolated VMs (disclosure, I'm one of the founders). Getting work off your laptop is such a productivity boost when you have parallel threads. Obviously there are a ton of products in this category (rest of the comments here have many examples) but we're 100% focused on the cloud experience
stevenou 12 hours ago||
Trying this out... based on Claude's assessment it's got the fullest support for my existing workflow requirements compared to some of the others ones suggested.
dregitsky 11 hours ago||
Awesome, thanks a ton for trying it! Definitely reach out of you hit any issues or have feedback, email is drew at boxes.dev
nwparker 14 hours ago|||
Orca dev here! I'd suggest Orca

Why? We let you bring your own cloud (versus being locked in).

You can bring a local cloud, sandboxes, or whatever you'd like

We even launched community plugins this week for VM/sandboxes (our you can have your own internal plugin)

https://www.onorca.dev/plugins?kind=machines

hoakiet98 15 hours ago|||
Paradev founder here, our cloud workspaces should cover most of that https://paradev.com
boudra 11 hours ago|||
give https://paseo.sh a go, self host it to get many of the same features and more
flessio 11 hours ago||
+1 - we've been very happy on Paseo.

We like the web + mobile app orientation (available without an app store!) along with the high degree of control.

Anyone moved between Paseo and T3? Curious to hear what motivated you in either direction.

217 17 hours ago|||
I'd say tern or orca, some customization and a decent vps will get you 95%+ of the way there
TheGamerUncle 17 hours ago||
superset.sh is quite a good option that will mostly get you there.
bqsile 16 hours ago||
I switched to T3 codes a few weeks ago after being a power user of Conductor and I understand why the product felt a bit stale now.
steve_adams_86 8 hours ago|
What do you get out of T3? What's the appeal?
paultannenbaum 17 hours ago||
Heavy conductor user here. Does the hacker news community have any suggestions for replacements?
2001zhaozhao 17 hours ago||
I will always recommend T3 Code, it is by far the best one I have tried that isn't glued to a specific model provider. Trades blows with Codex / Claude Desktop in terms of features. All of the other multi-provider orchestrators have not been keeping up with Claude Desktop in particular adding features at lightning-speed, but T3 Code somehow manages.

(I am building my own tool in this area and I literally downloaded and tried all of them as market research)

yewenjie 6 hours ago|||
Wait, there's something called Claude Desktop that's actually useful for non-non-technical people?
isege 17 hours ago|||
I second this. T3 code especially for remote machine workflows is unmatched.
nwparker 14 hours ago|||
https://orca.dev I think it's probably the easiest switch (Conductor imports).

I work on Orca and we're shipping frequently.

Let us know if you have feedback! (MIT OSS)

mchusma 14 hours ago|||
I switched from conductor to orca because conductor didn’t support mobile app working with local instances and didn’t have a good cli/mcp at the time.

Very happy I switched. I’m extremely productive on mobile. It defiiitely feels power usery but i am one so it works great.

My only gripe is sometimes it loses connections to workspaces in a way that is hard to recover BUT the meta conductor living on top can resolve it for me. Kudos for having it.

nwparker 14 hours ago||
If you make a GH issues for your connection problem we can also probably get to the bottom of it!
j1mc 12 hours ago|||
appImage is not a great packaging format for Linux. Any chance you could ship a flatpak instead? You'd likely need to host your own flatpak remote, but it's not rocket surgery.

Thank you for your consideration and for your work.

umbra07 2 hours ago||
It is far, far easier to convert an AppImage into a Flatpak (or any other packaging form) than vice versa.

If a dev is only going to choose one, I'd much rather they ship an AppImage.

twalla 14 hours ago|||
there are so many and I'm sure something has changed since I last checked but:

- paseo: open, mobile app is a first class citizen, i've been happy with it

- orca: vc backed, featureful (built in ios sim, for example)

- herdr: vc backed, terminal native, im sure there are more features since i last checked it

- t3: open, never used it but folks seem to like it

pkilgore 2 hours ago|||
I moved to Paseo. Open source and let's you drive from your phone.
hmokiguess 17 hours ago|||
https://herdr.dev/
t1ll 14 hours ago|||
I'm one of the founders of https://podium.do. We created Podium because none of the other ADEs worked like what we wanted. I think it could be interesting for you to checkout as an alternative because there are similarities to Conductor, plus a few interesting additional features. We are pretty strong for complex tasks because we put an agent native issue tracker at the core of architecture which turned out as a super power in that case.
wslh 13 hours ago||
Does Podium support Gemini?
FriendlyMike 14 hours ago|||
Free 3 month sub to any current Conductor user. We promise to never sell to Facebook, X or other weirdo billionaires. I started this company to get away from working at big tech and not to sell to it. Up to 10 cloud workspaces per person, works with all the things you need. https://hive.codes/signup
FriendlyMike 13 hours ago||
Founder demo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pghD8n_Prw4 :-)
davecyen 14 hours ago|||
I use Paradev (https://paradev.com - previously Superset) and it's great. They posted a migration guide today https://docs.paradev.com/migrate-from-conductor
fumplethumb 14 hours ago|||
https://ampcode.com/ is amazing! Surprised the community here does not discuss it more.
rramon 8 hours ago||
Could be a Laravel and PHP X bubble thing, former JS/TS only devs mostly seem to promote T3.
ball_of_lint 13 hours ago|||
https://imbue.com/product/sculptor
doomspork 13 hours ago|||
https://utensils.io/claudette/
mickeyp 17 hours ago|||
Give my dreamcoder.ai harness a whirl. Runs in your browser on all 3 platforms. Tiling window manager; generous use of keyboard shortcuts, so it's not just for mouse users.
gateauxd 14 hours ago|||
I like using https://paradev.com/
bgnm2000 11 hours ago|||
highly recommend https://www.scape.work - it's unlimited agents in parallel, and unlimited orchestrators in parallel.
fabioz 17 hours ago|||
Check Beolis (https://beolis.com).

Disclaimer: I'm developing it.

feverishaaron 16 hours ago|||
Agentastic is great for mac users. I'm hoping the project gets a boost with this acquistion.
hoakiet98 15 hours ago|||
I'm obviously biased but Paradev, it imports your Conductor worktrees as is https://paradev.com
harryck9 17 hours ago|||
Paseo is great
217 17 hours ago|||
tern or orca or bb or vanilla claude code desktop / codex desktop
0xb0565e486 17 hours ago|||
Claude or ChatGPT
jl35db 17 hours ago|||
boxes.dev!
fabianlindfors 16 hours ago|||
getbb.app
priyadarshy 17 hours ago|||
macro.land
skorobogatko 15 hours ago||
buzzpot.app :)
nickfmatthews 2 hours ago||
Is anybody else running into the problem trying to sign up for Conductor, where it says that new signups are closed and offers you no other route forward? There are some docs referencing the Meta acquisition and a focus on local since they're closing cloud, but no way to actually use the Mac app locally without signup.

It seems like it's got a lot of utility for my team and I, but jesus

jon-wood 1 hour ago|
Their announcement literally says that Conductor Local will be supported into 2027, which is 2 months away. Now is not the time to be jumping on board with it.
julesrms 1 hour ago|
Well, if any of the disgruntled people on this thread fancy moving to an agent with a similarly-themed name and vibe, Juggler (https://github.com/juggler-ai/juggler) is available.

No sign-up required - the angle I'm taking is that juggler is a client-server architecture, and if you want cloud VM sessions, you just spin up your own server and run a juggler server process on there. Its GUI is identical whether it's a local or remote session.

(I'd never actually heard of conductor, but interesting to see that people do want that kind of managed cloud backend server. I might think about the logistics of offering that)

And I promise to never sell-out to Meta[1].

[1] Nah, of course I would if they offered me a really huge amount of money.

More comments...