Top
Best
New

Posted by NathanFlurry 2 days ago

Launch HN: Rivet (YC W23) – Scale and Orchestrate Agents on S3(github.com)
Hey HN, this is Nathan and Nicholas from Rivet (https://rivet.dev) – a fast, high-density, and scalable orchestrator for agentic workloads using the actor model. Rather than running a heavyweight sandbox per agent, each agent gets a lightweight actor backed by S3.

Actors provide a long-lived process for long agent turns, in-memory state for context, a WebSocket server for multiplayer, durable SQLite storage backed by S3, and hibernation when idle.

It's a similar model to Cloudflare Durable Objects, but it’s open source and self-hostable.

Here’s a video walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ev6I7DOV9c

When we went through YC in 2023, we were building infrastructure for multiplayer games like Diep and Krunker. This involved heavily optimizing high-throughput matchmaking, real-time player messages, and blitz scaling. Through that process, we spent a lot of time on workloads where Postgres couldn't keep up with our throughput. We started out by hacking together Lua scripts on top of Redis, but this became too cumbersome to maintain and upgrade. This led us to extend our game server orchestrator to support what we call Rivet Actors today: many lightweight workers with in-memory state and durable storage. By using actors, we were able to serve tens of millions of monthly active users.

As agents grew in popularity, it became clear that running agents in sandboxes is inefficient. Sandboxes are expensive, mostly idle, and slow to start. Developers started using actors because they are far more memory efficient (72 KB baseline for actors vs 512 MB for a minimal sandbox) and fast to start (4.9 ms p99 for actors vs 1.7 s p99 for sandboxes).

For example, Amp is using Rivet to orchestrate multiplayer agents. They originally tried to build on Cloudflare Durable Objects, but couldn’t launch because of the platform’s limitations and unresponsive support. They migrated to Rivet Actors in a weekend and deploy on-prem. Rivet’s flexible architecture lets them adapt it to their own use cases without being constrained by a framework or the memory, storage, and runtime limits of Cloudflare Durable Objects.

Under the hood, Rivet is backed by S3 while maintaining SSD speeds.

Why S3? Previously, Rivet ran on FoundationDB. However, we were surprised to find that companies are storing orders of magnitude more data on Rivet Actors than in Postgres, such as large session transcripts, agent artifacts, and full POSIX filesystems. As their data grew, they had to start paying for SSDs that sat mostly idle with old transcripts. This led us to double down on S3 as our primary storage medium without sacrificing performance. This choice means that data stored on Rivet is 10× cheaper than on EBS gp3 while maintaining SSD speeds.

It’s not as simple as writing data straight to S3. Lots of PUTs for tiny blobs of data are slow and expensive. Instead, we use an SSD tier to optimize speed and cost:

When you write data to an actor’s SQLite database, the write is acknowledged once SSDs in 2 of 3 availability zones have it. Then, the data is batched to S3 in the background. This means that S3 is never on the write path, which lowers latency and cost. When reading data or waking an actor, Rivet reads from SSDs if already cached and falls back to S3 if not. SSD caches can be tuned to meet your needs, giving you configurable tiered storage for your actors.

This architecture lets Rivet provide 1.07 ms durable writes (3 AZ, p99), 1.36 ms reads (p99), and 138 ms reads from object storage (p99).

We’ve spent a lot of time making sure that Rivet can run wherever you need it. Self-hosting requires deploying a single Rust binary with S3 as the only dependency, Rivet Cloud lets you deploy dedicated clusters on AWS or GCP in any region, and BYOC lets us deploy Rivet to your VPC without having to operate it yourself. Rivet also runs identically in local dev as in production, since Rivet is a lightweight binary that runs anywhere

Rivet Actors can be written in TypeScript or Rust. Out of the box, they support agents (Pi Durable), workflows, real-time, multiplayer, running AI-generated code, Durable Streams, and integrations with tools like Vercel’s Eve and Turso. See all of our available guides, or point your agent at them: https://rivet.dev/docs/#guides

Try it out now, by reading our quickstart guides (https://rivet.dev/docs/) or ask your agent: “Run npx skills add rivet-dev/skills, then build a multiplayer chat agent and run it locally.”

We’d love to get feedback on your experience with Rivet! We’re deeply invested in making Rivet an easy-to-self-host, flexible, and efficient way to run agentic workloads.

GitHub: https://github.com/rivet-dev/rivet

Architecture: https://rivet.dev/docs/architecture/

Benchmarks: https://rivet.dev/docs/benchmarking/

Self-hosting: https://rivet.dev/docs/deploy/self-host/

120 points | 59 comments
kianN 2 days ago|
> When you write data to an actor’s SQLite database, the write is acknowledged once SSDs in 2 of 3 availability zones have it. Then, the data is batched to S3 in the background. This means that S3 is never on the write path, which lowers latency and cost. When reading data or waking an actor, Rivet reads from SSDs if already cached and falls back to S3 if not. SSD caches can be tuned to meet your needs, giving you configurable tiered storage for your actors.

As someone who is not incredibly deep in the agent space, but works a lot on scientific and distributed computing, this really caught my eye. Seems like this is primarily part of the cloud offering, but a true posix compatible filesystem that interops cleanly with S3 on the backend would be an incredibly interesting product (especially if it were open-sourced).

A brief sidenote: I did a triple take when I saw the name because Rivet is the internal name of our long-running job queue service. You all have great taste.

whalesalad 2 days ago||
Lots of ways to use S3 as a filesystem. FUSE is one. AWS even offers it as a service now.
sharts 2 days ago||
Those don’t actually give you things like fsevents/inotify. If say you needed to run git or build something, it would not work.
patcon 2 days ago||
I hate to be that guy, but celld does essentially the same thing, no? It waits until persisted to another node OR stored in S3, but unless something has gone horribly wrong, this will essentially always be replicating to the other node first. (Admittedly, I recall it used to be just replicating to 1 node was considered stored, and if that went down it could be lost. I think it's two now, or at least the bug is filed. Prob how the write time was so low in celld, but perhaps wasn't sustainable)

Regardless, glad for more stateful serverless options, even if I am partial to what CloudFlare folks build :)

kianN 2 days ago||
I'm not super familiar with celld, but my understanding is that its not a full posix filesystem. We work with lots of dynamically created and queried duckdb and netcdf files. My impression of celld is its meant for more lightweight storage and that objects live in SQLite files.

I could be totally mistaken but that's my current understanding.

fastball 2 days ago||
Rivet is very cool. Switched a Cloudflare Durable Object piece of our infrastructure that lived in its own little fairy tale land to our own infra within the rest of our VPC. Was a very pleasant experience.

Haven't had the chance to try Rivet v3 yet but hoping to get to it soon.

NathanFlurry 2 days ago||
Appreciate the kind words, would love to hear feedback on v3 in our Discord when you upgrade!
keeganpoppen 2 days ago||
fairy tale land?
fastball 2 days ago||
The rest of our infra is AWS + Vercel, so the CF DO stuff was in its own weird isolated space that had to be maintained and cared about separately.
xms17189 2 days ago||
Fascinating architecture—treating agent turns as persistent lightweight actors backed by tiered SQLite/S3 rather than spinning up dedicated VMs makes a lot of sense for latency and cost.

For workflows that inevitably require arbitrary shell execution or local compiler tools (like coding agents running tests), do you envision delegating just the side-effect execution out to ephemeral runners while keeping the stateful actor long-lived, or is Rivet primarily focused on API/tool-calling agents?

serjester 2 days ago||
Even as someone who’s very involved in the space, I don’t understand what you guys do. It’d be helpful if your website led with the problem you’re solving instead of technical benchmarks.

I also don’t really understand the distinction between an actor and an agent. I’ve never heard anyone call them actors, and I doubt you’ll win that mindshare as a small startup.

throwaway-blaze 2 days ago||
Man I was just coming here to say the same thing. I have a Ph.D. in CS and should be the target audience for this as a guy doing startup stuff that could easily try out a new architecture or tool.

I read "Rivet (https://rivet.dev) – a fast, high-density, and scalable orchestrator for agentic workloads using the actor model" and I think "I have no idea what this means, except it's a new way to make a backend service of some kind??"

I've reached an age where, if I don't understand what it is from your description, I'm not the problem.

ggsp 2 days ago||
I’m likely not much farther ahead than you are in understanding exactly what Rivet does, as I learn by banging my head against the thing I’m trying to use, and so far all I’ve done is read.

“Actor” comes from established CS terminology [1], and agents-in-actors make sense in principle.

Agree with others in this thread that a few use-cases in the README would help me decide whether this is worth banging my head against or not.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor_model

takeitwhen 2 days ago||
One thing that bit me running long agent workflows: hibernate/resume is great until tool results aren't part of the durable snapshot. If the actor wakes from SQLite alone and the previous turn's tool payload lived only in memory (or a temp file), the next step invents a confident continuation. We ended up treating "resume" as unsafe unless the last tool I/O was written into the same durable store as the conversation before suspend. Density numbers matter less than whether wake always reconstitutes enough to refuse to continue when that evidence is missing.
adsharma 2 days ago||
Distributed actors are also good platforms to run graph algorithms. We're evaluating Rivet as a potential substrate to run page rank and clustering algorithms on large graphs, while supporting cypher queries over the result.

https://github.com/orgs/Latentpedia/discussions/4

Related work:

https://sigmodrecord.org/publications/sigmodRecord/1712/pdfs...

https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.01395

petervandijck 2 days ago||
Love that architecture. I’m becoming a major fan of SQLite for agents to work with. I wonder if you looked at Cloudlfares D1 as an option. For myself, I built an easy mcp for my agents to run SQLite databases which I’m finding mostly useful for scheduled agents in Claude, they have stuff to keep track of. https://getairdash.com if anyone wants to try that out (it’s free, cloudflare is very very cheap)
madisonmay 2 days ago||
Hey Nathan! You build a fantastic product and your tech seems rock solid. I think you would benefit from more use-case specific tutorials and how-to guides so that people find and use your product for the applications that it's a great fit for. Multi-agent systems, code review agents, software factories, etc.

More so than ever, folks are choosing to build rather than buy -- you should emphasize that your product lets teams avoid having to choose by handling the "boring" parts for them and letting them focus on the parts that are unique to their business.

sebastienburel 2 days ago||
How does hibernation decide an actor is idle? In my agent runtime actors run in XS. Messages are queued and only handled once the current handler returns, so a synchronous handler is never cut in half. But while a handler waits on an async call, an HTTP request say, other messages still get handled. So “no message being processed” isn’t the same as “nothing in flight”. Does Rivet hibernate an actor with an outstanding request, and if so, what happens when the response comes back?
haseebws94 2 days ago|
Hey Nathan! I remember Rivet from Playflow, back when you guys did game server orchestration. Great to see you guys grow!

Have you had agents like claude code , codex etc all fully running in agent-os? Trying to understand the use case a bit better here. For context, I've recently built our own pipeline which spins up ephemeral linux vms for claude code, codex, etc which do their work & the state always persists but frees up resources when finished. Is the idea pretty much similar for agent-os here?

Also with the s3 backing changes, it reminds me a lot of the work done on celld, good to see more self-hostable durable objects out there.

NathanFlurry 2 days ago|
Been a minute since the gaming days, thanks for reaching out!

> Have you had agents like claude code , codex etc all fully running in agent-os?

We have gotten them all working inside of agentOS. However, we found it's a better architecture to run the agent loop outside of agentOS and expose it as tools. The trust boundary & blast radius of running the agent inside the sandbox makes it difficult.

Also, the memory overhead of running individual Claude Code instances is nuts, it's better to run the agents in a single process using tools.

I wrote a bit more on it here: https://rivet.dev/blog/2026-07-27-run-your-harness-outside-t...

> Also with the s3 backing changes, it reminds me a lot of the work done on celld, good to see more self-hostable durable objects out there.

Appreciate it!

Rivet has a much different architecture than most S3-backed databases. Having an object-per-actor doesn't scale well with cost and performance, so we built a SSD tiered storage engine instead: https://rivet.dev/changelog/2026-10-26-introducing-rivet-3-0...

Ping me on Discord if you give it a try, would be fun to catch up: https://rivet.dev/discord

More comments...