Top
Best
New

Posted by mkeeter 2 days ago

Goodbye from Salon(www.salon.com)
651 points | 268 commentspage 3
andrewclunn 2 days ago|
I am increasingly convinced that this "golden age of journalism" is an imagined time shortly after Deep Throat and the Nixon scandal, that never really materialized and then was longed for nostalgically as if it existed.
cleandreams 2 days ago||
I think it’s been something of a zombie publication for a while which always was sad to me as I was a big fan in the early days. They used to have interesting thoughtful takes.
paulpauper 2 days ago|
yes, it exists to collect ad revenue by leveraging its considerable domain authority and good google rankings
nekusar 2 days ago||
Alas.

Craigslist was the first nail in the newspaper coffin. Classifieds and adverts ate a LOT of local money. And all of that went poof. CL cost $0 to post. Why would I pay $10 for a week advert?

All the aggregators grabbed news from everywhere, and paid 0 for it. It cost to make. And made nothing. Encouraged the closed/paywall web.

Ganett etm bought a LOT of local papers, and lowered quality as low as they could go. Inertia kept many older subscribers. I know 0 millrnial and younger subscribers.

NYT and other major papers are easy to sign up, and you basically have to die to get rid of. I would never recommend.

There's a lot of factors. Basically most journalists are going to the glue factory, like horses did with motor vehicles.

hobo123 2 days ago||
I think I last read a salon.com article maybe 10 years ago. Didn't know they were still around.
ForHackernews 2 days ago||
Really sad loss. Salon's ex-comments section, The WELL, actually predates the magazine part and lives on as an independent community again: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_WELL
mrcwinn 2 days ago||
Totally forgot Salon existed. I guess that’s part of the problem. For anyone interested in independent journalism, I strongly recommend Breaking Points.

https://youtube.com/@breakingpoints

tptacek 2 days ago|
Breaking Points is also just punditry; if you're interested in independent journalism, try to find an outlet to support that has newsgathering jobs!
chmorgan_ 2 days ago||
We need as many news organizations as we can get imo. I used to read them in the 2000s. The tone kept shifting towards negativity and vitriol and reporting perception of intentions rather than facts. Not surprised they are winding down.
johnnyApplePRNG 2 days ago||
I'll never understand this.

31 years in operation and you just ... close completely?

The long tail of 31 years of goodwill is worthless?

Why not turn it into a news aggregator site like yahoo news or something, at least?

paulpauper 2 days ago|
it will exist to collect ad revenue on its huge library or articles
johnnyApplePRNG 2 days ago||
OK so they're not shutting down shutting down.... they're just not penning articles any longer?

ask.com closing was more along the lines of what I was talking about then. that bugs me that they don't still have any form of simple search or a news portal or anything.... just, "bye!".

Seems like a waste.

paulpauper 2 days ago||
collecting ad revenue is much cheaper than a full time staff
throwaway81523 2 days ago||
I hope they keep the archived site open for read-only.
paulpauper 2 days ago|
Likely they will. they make tons of ad revenue this way. the domain has considerable domain authority and its articles rank well. unless they sell the actual domain
khazhoux 2 days ago|
In early 2000s I always enjoyed Salon’s political articles by this young journalist named Jake Tapper.
More comments...