Posted by jamesjyu 1 day ago
- Sally, Asimov 1953 (spot on with Waymo)
- I, Robot etc, Asimov
- HAL 2001 A Space Odyssey
- any Iain M. Banks Culture novelIt might not have predicted LLMs but it certainly fit with Herbert's ongoing thematic study of people in insane environments producing unanticipated outcomes.
If you haven't, you may want to check out the other books in Herbert's Pandora Sequence (Destination: Void is the beginning)… but they are a bit of an acquired taste.
> A high-scoring story shows readers moved by machine literature, editors publishing it, an audience enjoying its music, or critics taking the work seriously.
How is this a criterion for LLMs being sci-fi AI? If anything, opposite is true. It seems that the author is comparing his own sci-fi image of LLMs with sci-fi. Or Claude's vision of itself, I guess, since this is all vibe-written except the initial few lines.
>The two machines begin with arithmetic and soon communicate through mathematics their engineers can’t follow. That’s the most relevant prediction here: machine intellectual activity racing ahead of the people supervising it.
This misses the specificity of the scene's prediction. Colossus and Guardian are basically speaking in the style of the super-dense, almost incomprehensible-to-human chain of thought that LLMs indulge in nowadays. One might also point to the just-released news of LLMs easily seeing patterns, incomprehensible to humans, in model weights.