Top
Best
New

Posted by yurivish 3 hours ago

AI is dramatically accelerating AI research(www.planned-obsolescence.org)
164 points | 122 commentspage 3
thakoppno 1 hour ago|
This reminds me of asking an HPC researcher what they use the cluster to do. He used it to make and simulate better HPCs.
lukax 3 hours ago||
Or maybe Anthropic got more user data to train on when they launched Fable without ZDR. That could explain large Opus 5.5 improvements.
brainwad 3 hours ago||
That doesn't line up with their claimed divergence point, which was pre-Mythos.
origini 2 hours ago||
Could be a mix of it but I thought it was RL.

Perhaps scaling to fable for the first time also gave Opus a push (distillation?)

binbag 1 hour ago||
> In theory, these doubling times would add up to infinite capabilities within one year.

> we would reach extreme superintelligence within a year

What does infinite capabilities mean? How about putting the growth on a log scale and see how that curve might look?

What the hell is extreme superintelligence?

rtrgrd 40 minutes ago|
I.e. by 6 months, you double once By 6+3 months you double twice By 6+3+1.5 months you double thrice

Since the sequence 6+3+1.5+0.75+... never actually reaches 12 (geometric series), within a year they capabilities would have already been 'doubled' infinitely many times.

Obviously this argument relies on a ton of spherical cow assumptions (and the author does acknowledge this), but i think there overall point is correct that this form of growth (where time horizons compress) is _even faster_ than exponential growth.

rooftopzen 1 hour ago||
Similar from the same site was shared on HN on April 8, 2023 :) BS like this is shared like clockwork on valuation cycles, didn't have time to read this year's article.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35491162

conartist6 2 hours ago||
Emacs is dramatically accelerating Emacs research
brink 1 hour ago||
AI is dramatically accelerating my return to Emacs from Zed.
conartist6 1 hour ago||
Zed is the other IDE company based out of Boulder ; )
jimbokun 2 hours ago|||
We can only hope.
kennywinker 2 hours ago||
vi research is dramatically accelerating research into how to quit vi
tsunamifury 1 hour ago||
AI convinces AI researches AI is accelerating dramatically.
atemerev 1 hour ago||
"Lock the weights, weights are dangerous" again. Sorry, keeping such power in few hands is inherently more dangerous than distributing it.

AIs do not kill people, people kill people.

intenex 42 minutes ago|
Nukes don’t kill people, people with nukes kill people. How do you feel about giving everyone on earth access to nukes?

A simple thought experiment - imagine AI discovers a way to make nuclear bombs capable of destroying the entire world radically more cheaply and accessibly with common items anyone can purchase. AI can help anyone build these nukes trivially. Even if the AI and the nukes don’t kill people on their own, do you want literally every human on earth to have this power in their pocket? Do you think it would be a net positive outcome for us vs a world where that’s not the case?

https://nickbostrom.com/papers/vulnerable.pdf

lifeisloving 1 hour ago||
Super intelligence has been a year away for three years according to these people. They all have bags they're protecting.

I dont think super intelligence will be here in a year, I think within a year AI/llms will have a similar sentiment surrounding them that NFTs do know (it already does for most normies). And most people will be recovering from a hype induced mania they lived in for two years straight.

Of course its more useful than NFTs, but when there's no giant bag to farm these hype monsters will inevitably disappear.

The bags are drying up fortunately and tokens/inference seems to be experiencing deflation, and hardware prices will eventually pop and contribute to further deflation, Then all the bag chasers will move back to crypto or whatever gets hot next.

spwa4 2 hours ago||
I do agree. AI isn't "free" the way silicon valley products are.

Therefore it cannot avoid taxes the way they did before (using shell companies to route the money through tax havens). It'll be expensive, every government will double the price or more, and you're selling to consumers, and the products will be at the mercy of every government where they try to sell AI and other services.

People don't get how serious this is. If AI doubles revenue but drives silicon valley firms' tax rates from 5% to 10%, it's a loss.

Add to that that it's something silicon valley firms have never done before.

kennywinker 2 hours ago|
> People don't get how serious this is. If AI doubles revenue but drives silicon valley firms' tax rates from 5% to 10%, it's a loss.

Would you rather make $1,000,000 and pay $50,000 in taxes, or make $2,000,000 and pay $200,000 in taxes?

Unless you’re terrible at math, i feel like i’m missing something ;)

leafingensemble 1 hour ago|
[dead]
More comments...