Posted by arbayi 23 hours ago
I reported an obvious fraud call to the authorities once per web form, and they followed up about two weeks later thanking me for my submission and that they banned the number block and company behind it.
Strict regulation and enforcement works.
Netflix is an example of a company that takes a hardline stance not allowing a VoIP number on an account, even while banks don't seem to care since it's the customer's choice.
It still depends on public databases with hopefully-accurate data. I'm registered on Netflix on a number which can make and receive VoIP calls. It's just not a usual VoIP-specific provider. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50401117
(Note: I don't agree with any equivalency or even correlation between phone numbers and legal persons)
Phone numbers are irrelevant for that though, so the only reason banks would think they need it is a false correlation between phone numbers and identities.
Netflix also seems to think phone numbers have something to do with identities. But you'd expect banks to be more serious about verification.
(Just checked my company number, running on a hosted PBX, and it's marked as landline with no extra porting info that would contradict it)
I very rarely get calls on my mobile; only about one in twenty aren’t scams.
Already been doing that for a solid 20+ years now, ever since PocketPC/Windows Mobile first introduced the feature. But OpenAI getting SIP support is not some great new existential threat... we've had similar APIs for years with services like Twilio.
I've had this configured for a while now due to my number being leaked all over the place and getting 4-8 spam calls a day :/
Every few weeks, it’s either a fake invoice or investment pitch.
Since I receive them as a PDF in an email, I wonder if prompt injection via fax has been done.
Get with the times, Congress.