Top
Best
New

Posted by edward 12 hours ago

Humans will never again create a project quite like Wikipedia(www.economist.com)
468 points | 411 commentspage 9
betterunix2 9 hours ago|
Sounds like some MAGA bros I am friends with who were telling me in 2024 that Democrats would "never" take power again.

Making "never" predictions is a dangerous game, especially when you are talking about human beings doing something they already did in the past.

ciefa 11 hours ago||
Why do people even entertain this idea lol.
DotNetCorePowa 12 hours ago||
Economists (not the website) and accurate predictions are two very different things, first.

The economists, the website site, second.

Humans will never fly, etc. Third.

(Extra point for the paywall).

alex1138 8 hours ago||
What, captured and censored?

Sorry for the snark and I welcome my downvotes. But Sanger isn't wrong about what he's said about it

nephihaha 12 hours ago||
Wikipedia has been an excellent resource for LLMs, and seems to be one of their prime resources. Make of that what you will.
AndyMcConachie 12 hours ago|
And before that it was the #1 result for most Google searches.
StilesCrisis 12 hours ago||
Not "most searches." Wikipedia was (probably still is!) the the most common #1 result.

"#1 result for most searches" would mean 50% of all searches would have Wikipedia up top, and no site clears that bar.

KMnO4 12 hours ago|||
That’s incorrect. If there are 10 websites competing for #1, Wikipedia could show up twice in 11 searches while the others showed up once.
StilesCrisis 11 hours ago||
"#1 result for most searches" would literally mean that I could take all the searches for a given day, then find a 50%+1 subset that all have the same top result. There is no such top result.
wgraj 11 hours ago|||
The word you're looking for is plurality.
StilesCrisis 11 hours ago||
Don't tell me, tell the guy who said "most!"
nekusar 10 hours ago||
Sad hyper-end stage capitalists (economist.com) see only their own reflection, and cannot fathom why people would donate time to help each other and humanity.
markhahn 10 hours ago||
paywall; dr

Isn't this rather rich, though? the internet itself is a collaborative project - even TCP/IP is. I have a hard time imagining a cogent argument for why cooperation is dead.

I think we're mainly missing some legal framework. For instance, suppose we stopped allowing social media companies to borg our content. Require open access to all SM content, make anti-inter-op illegal. Yes, it's true that SM companies spend a lot to provide "free" services, but I'd claim that it does not follow that the necessary consequence is walled gardens. That thinking dates from prehistory, when computers and networking were, you know, expensive.

dfbdns53463 10 hours ago||
ummm has anyone even heard of the arrstack lol
fortran77 10 hours ago||
See also the New Yorker today: "The Death Knell of Digital Search" https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite-scroll/the-death-...
thedellmonitor 11 hours ago|
"Humans will never again create a project like Wikipedia" aaaaaand it's paywalled. The irony.
More comments...