Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2

Fluxenic 9 hours ago|

Why not fable 5.5?

user43928 7 hours ago||

Because it's a bad release and not even worth using over Opus 5.5.

The improvement is marginal, it makes the same exact errors as Opus, but slower and much more expensive.

From what I saw, it has slightly better taste in some 3D mechanics, but mostly doesn't even bring discernible visual improvement.

fguerraz 9 hours ago||

So that people don't just reach out for it thinking it's the standard best model I guess. Opus is still, IMHO, the best intelligence per dollar, token, and speed.

mococa 22 hours ago||

I knew it, Claude was pretty dumb from last days until now

Madmallard 6 hours ago||

Someone jailbreak it to get it to devise a way smarter than what we currently come up with to distill it through its own defenses and then do that.

sylware 7 hours ago||

Is there a command line to access anonymous free prompt of various online AI inference services?

Something like yt-dlp (namely with near 0 deps), but for AI prompts?

meisel 22 hours ago||

Curious to see the Maxxbench score for these

kaushaltrii88 13 hours ago||

Mythos 5.2 is great

astlouis44 21 hours ago||

Anyone tried making games with it yet?

no-user 8 hours ago||

Initial testing looks like Fable 5.2 is still load bearing.

adeptima 22 hours ago|

Why dont I feel any urge to even try Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2 unless it will force up on me?

Compared Opus 5.5 200 usd a month with Codex 200 usd (Astra High) and Kimi Pro 100 usd a month ... and now have a new conspiracy theory - more their suck your code the better outcome even just over few days time on large code base.

Horrible experience correcting course of Codex and Kimi flow compare to Opus. Opus much more responsive

Dont feel any gain of Codex 200 usd over Codex 100 usd

Kimi Pro feels like a fake Louis Vuitton bag with extreme high material quality and yet still fake ... a bit trash talk ... but clearly seen not so distant future where I can live without Codex and Claude