Top
Best
New

Posted by 1659447091 2 days ago

The last European train that travels by sea(www.bbc.com)
174 points | 160 comments
iagooar 2 days ago|
This summer I took the ferry from Hirtshals, Denmark to Seydisfjordur, Iceland. 2 full days, over 48 hours of travel time. And back.

Relatives and friends thought my wife and I were crazy - or at least eccentric. Why would you waste 4 full days (+ 2 days to get to and from Denmark by car).

Turns out, travel time is still travel. And what a beautiful time that was!

There is no stable Internet conncetion on the ferry itself (no cell connection AT ALL at sea), plus you have to pay for it a pretty hefty fee. So from observing other people, +95% did not have Internet access at all.

The ferry itself is not huge, it is not a cruise ship. But large enough to be entertaining and fun to explore. Kids had a few attractions, including a tiny cinema. They sold popcorn though, that's all kids cared about besides the Minecraft movie.

For us, adults, there were a few bars, restaurants to hang out. Even a little library, a corner with board games, couple shops.

Because people were not glued to their phones, you could actually meet and talk to other people, have non-trivial conversations. People would read books, have a sip of coffee, walk around.

Not once did I get bored, not once did I not know what to do. Sure enough, I would pull out the iPhone from my pocket only to see it is completely offline. What was also fun: if I went out with the kids, there was no way I could let me wife know we would be late or any other matters. Same the other way.

Life felt slower, but somehow more real?

Anyway, I can only recommend a travel experience like this, at least once in your lifetime. For us, it became part of the memories we made, besides visiting Iceland itself. I can imagine the same being the case if you travel long distances by train.

codyb 2 days ago||
Took a train from NYC to Chicago and it was so nice. Similar amount of time, about two days I think all in all. And just rolling on the plains, got myself a bunk, was more expensive than the plane ride home but 25 times more enjoyable and fulfilling.

Ditching my phone as much as possible has been the best decision I've ever made. Life always feels a little slower when you're not constantly inundated with outside noise.

I still pay attention, but instead of constantly paying attention and doing nothing, I pay attention a good amount, and do things instead.

mzi 1 day ago||
I was a little taken by the state of American trains if this was true. Two days would mean at least 36h for me and that in turn would mean that the trains would have an average speed of 20mph.

But it turns out that it takes 20h, so twice that speed. Still not fast but better. With that duration it also seems unlikely that the speed is kept artificially low to allow some sleep on the train, as is very common in Europe.

globular-toast 2 days ago|||
I've done a number of long distance walking holidays now. Weeks straight of walking every day. Pilgrims walk ~800km in ~6 weeks on the Camino de Santiago in Spain throughout the year. I've done shorter routes both in Spain and elsewhere. It's really a great way to switch off. Your whole life becomes the Way. How far do you have to walk? Where are you going to eat? Do you need to carry food? What's the weather looking like? Going back to being stationary afterwards is quite jarring actually.
gambiting 2 days ago|||
As a sort of counter anecdote - we took a ferry from Portsmouth to Bilbao once, it was also just over 2 days on the sea. But oh boy, I regularly take ferries from UK to Netherlands, but I've never seen sea as rough as this. We were pretty much stuck in the cabin, sea sick, for the entire two days. I decided to brave the neausea and attempt to go for some food, but in the main buffet plates were literally sliding off the tables.

On the way back we decided to drive through france and skip the ferry.

But yes, on the Newcastle to Amsterdam crossing my favourite thing is being completely cut off from the internet, can finally sit down with a book without the compulsive need to check my phone every 5 minutes.

gregoriol 2 days ago|||
Can only agree on that: took 5 ferries this summer from 5 to 18 hours, and it's almost always a very nice experience. You have to be ready for "rough" seas though, may be a problem for some. Even the wait time before getting on the ship can be a good time to chat with other travellers. And you see things you wouldn't see from land.
wingworks 1 day ago|||
I took the train from Copenhagen to Stockholm a few years back. I remember getting on the train and then all of a sudden we were boarding a boat, and got kicked out of the train while they transited the across the ocean.

I really liked it, was a cool experience, and an easy way to get on a boat. IDK if it's still like this. I hope it is.

I had checked google maps before the trip and saw a bridge so figured the train would go over that, but looks like it's car only bridge. Was a pleasant surprise.

jcranmer 1 day ago||
The Øresund Bridge is a combined road-rail bridge.

(As an interesting aside, the Swedish railroad system drives on the left, while the Danish one drives on the right, so the trains have to cross to the other side after crossing the strait.)

KurSix 2 days ago|||
What you described reminds me that travel isn't just about the destination, it is the time in between
precommunicator 1 day ago|||
Yeah, if you actually walk around outside of your cabin. I took this ferry last summer, pretty much didn't leave the cabin (except to look at Shetland Islands), only just before arriving. Having plenty of food, movies and games with me... yeah

If you take this ferry, make sure to do the stop in Faroe Islands, it's absolutely amazing.

I plan to sail this route again next year.

Side note: was it just me or this ferry or route is particularly rough? I crossed Baltic like 20 times by ferry (18h crossing), never got sea sick, until this one.

iagooar 1 day ago|||
I think you miss out on lots of attractions if you spend the entire trip hibernating in the cabin ;)

My wife got a bit sea sick on the 2nd day on our way back, I didn't notice any difference. But sure enough, depends on how steady your stomach is...

normie3000 1 day ago|||
Which part of the Baltic takes 18 hours to cross?

Anyway it wouldn't be too surprising it's less rough than the North Atlantic given the Baltic is closely wrapped in land.

precommunicator 1 day ago|||
Nynäshamn - Gdańsk. I've also did shorter routes like Ystad - Świnoujście and Helsinki - Tallinn
mzi 1 day ago|||
Stockholm - Helsinki, for example.
jacinda 1 day ago|||
The funny part of this is, you just described not only travel, but all of life prior to about 2003ish (at least in the United States). This is when, in my social circles, we transitioned to most people having cell phone access and the ability to "let people know if you would be late." Still a long time before smart phones became ubiquitous.

So this was "just life" in the 90s and beforehand. The upside you describe was also sometimes the downside. E.g. my mother was traveling for work when one of my brothers was injured in a way that required a trip to the ER for stitches (he's fine). My dad was getting us all (4 kids under 7) into the car as she called from her hotel and he basically had to answer and say that we were on the way to the hospital, and she just had to wait for an update once we got home many hours later.

And yet, I would still agree that "Life felt slower, but somehow more real?" and that we haven't yet found the right equilibrium for always being connected in a way humans were never able to be before. I'm glad experiences like this are still possible.

bananaboy 1 day ago|||
Paul Theroux talks about this a bit in one of his books, about how it’s about the journey and not the destination basically. I think it was The Old Patagonian Express.
oulipo2 2 days ago||
This summer I did Paris to Istanbul by train, through Vienna and Bucharest, it was wonderful!
iagooar 1 day ago|||
That sounds pretty cool. How many separate train connections did you have to book? Any problems with delays or canceled rides?
HWR_14 2 days ago|||
Was it a normal train or the famous "Oriental Express"?
lmm 1 day ago||
The Orient Express stopped running in 2009 (after it had already been successively cut back to just Strasbourg-Vienna), although it was a "normal train" in most senses (it was a regular EuroNight service, not really any different to ride from less famous ones like the Cassiopeia or Jan Kiepura).

The train you may be thinking of, a luxury train that imitates a historic one, is mimicing the the Simplon Orient Express which did not run through Vienna (and also it rarely goes beyond Venice).

HWR_14 1 day ago||
I was in fact thinking of the luxury version. I was not aware it was an imitation.
easyThrowaway 2 days ago||
The "mega bridge" is one of the most politicized and polarizing projects I've ever seen in my life.

My family lived in Messina for a while and it seems that in the last 100 years no one was actually interested in building nor genuinely stopping the project for good, just using it to bash whoever is on the opposite side of the argument.

- On the left it's seen as the biggest ecological issue they have in Italy, despite the ferry company handling the passage is a well known mafia-owned monopoly whose ferries leak tons of garbage and oil on the sea every single day.

- On the right they've gone with the most ridiculous, expensive and unachievable version of a project in order to to make sure they can siphon as much money as they can before declaring that the project has to be stopped or whatever.

Every summer I go back to my mother's family and when the topic comes out it's as they're basically stuck in a time loop.

xattt 2 days ago||
Prince Edward Island had a century-old plan that was finally executed in the 1990s to build a bridge to connect to mainland Canada (1).

This is the same debate that happens each time there’s a fixed connection to an island until the damn thing opens and people grow to love it.

It’s a pain in the arse to have to wait for the ferry, to sync your travel plans to ferry times, only to have to change plans again when the ferries break down.

(1) https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/pei-isla...

psunavy03 2 days ago|||
Having lived the majority of my adult life in greater Puget Sound, the ferries are great for tourists and a pain for actual day-to-day travel.
bombcar 2 days ago||||
It's not just that bridge, it seems it's almost any big new bridge that attracts all sorts of howling, even when it's painfully obvious it's needed.
ggm 1 day ago|||
Skye. Never used the bridge, used the ferry from Kyle of Localsh to Kyleakin and the one to Mallaig from Armadale. But what you say rings true. Romance went out the window, but for locals its a shitload easier to get on with life.
throw310822 1 day ago|||
> when the topic comes out it's as they're basically stuck in a time loop.

Fellow Italian here. The whole country is stuck in a time loop. Have you noticed that even the crime pages of the newspapers are filled with articles about investigations on murders of twenty or thirty or even forty years ago? And that on tv, people debate furiously terrorist acts that took place almost 50 years ago- when they also don't get updates from eternally ongoing investigations and trials? In politics, the same reforms that were proposed at the beginning of the '90s are brought up by each new government, generating new controversy and division, until they're forgotten or, sometimes, rolled back by Italy's supreme court. These days there's even a debate going on about the opportunity of introducing sexual education in schools for 6-8 graders, when I remember we had it already in the late '80s.

4gotunameagain 2 days ago|||
It's quite interesting for southern Italians to claim that a bridge will be detrimental to the ecology of the region, when in Sicily people routinely burn their trash on the street because the mafia controls the garbage disposal apparently.

2025. In Europe. They burn. Their trash. On the street.

NalNezumi 2 days ago|||
Huh interesting. I overheard a conversation in a bar around Kabukicho, Shinjuku, Tokyo a few years ago with similar story.

The bartender was talkingto a local bar owner, and he was explaining how he was trying to find another contractor for garbage disposal because he found the current rate ridiculous. Every contractor hung up on him after hearing his address, and he found out that yakuza had territories around Kabukicho and you'd get in trouble if you took a contract there.

Interesting to hear garbage disposal being a common business organized crime go for. I guess there's many utilities too to have garbage disposal infrastructure for other illegal activities

bobthepanda 1 day ago|||
it is that, it is a fairly undesirable business for goody two shoes to go into and expose people, it is also not a sympathetic business type, and everybody needs it.
astrange 1 day ago||
Garbage disposal is also remarkably hard in Japan, maybe understandable since they don't have anywhere to put it.

Instead of the famous Japanese customer service, residential garbage requires you to sort it, put it in transparent bags, put it out on specific days etc. so your neighbors can personally shame you if you do any of it wrong.

Commercial garbage in Tokyo gets left out on the street (like NYC up until this year) and occasionally attracts rats.

wraptile 1 day ago||
Japan burns 80% of their garbage compared to 35% of Germany or 12% of US. So disposal isn't very complex but does entail a lot of sorting.

The rest of Japan's garbage culture (small bins, poor/mafia organization etc.) is totally self inflicted and is more of a cultural phenomena rather than a technical one.

anentropic 2 days ago|||
watch The Sopranos :)
5- 2 days ago||
or ghost in the shell
easyThrowaway 2 days ago||||
No, it's way worse than that. They not only control the garbage disposal business and regional administration, they physically stop you from keeping your street / neighbourhood / town clean...Guess how do I know.

It's their "service" or no service, with some extremely narrow exceptions, like a very small town named Aci Bonaccorsi, which fought that and now they're able to keep their streets on an amazing level of cleaniness compared to nearby municipalities.

Garbage disposal is the last remaining big business handled by the local mafia (drugs are handled by camorra nowadays) and they're absolutely doing anything to avoid losing that.

lossyalgo 1 day ago||||
It was/is also that way in Athens, at least in the "anarchist" quarter of town. Every Friday the so-called anarchists (would) take dumpsters and light them on fire, to make a point, that the government is corrupt, or something. I'm not Greek so I can't speak for Greeks but other Greeks told me it's just part of life, so just look the other way. Also trash collection seems to often be an issue. They also have an island just for trash, but I heard it's already overflowing so they are looking for another island to use as a trash dump. Admittedly I haven't been there in a couple years, so maybe things have changed lately, but I do have a lot of photos of dumpsters on fire.
4gotunameagain 1 day ago||
This is not really accurate. I have lived in Athens. There were some years where burned dumpsters were not a rare sight (after the big riots of 2008), but it is really, really uncommon, especially considering the size of Athens.

And I have never heard anything (or were able to find something on google) about an island full of trash. Islands are simply too valuable for that, and you'd also need to bring the trash there by boat.

lossyalgo 19 hours ago||
When did you last live there? I was traveling/living in various parts of Greece for short periods of time over the last 30 years, the last time in 2018, where, due to EU economic sanctions, there were still regular fires happening in the anarchist district (Exarcheia). Googling shows that there are still regularly things burning there (as well as Zografou), though lately[0] it seems to be primarily vehicles. Just Google "Exarcheia fires" and you will find a lot of articles from almost every year going back to at least 2008.

Zakynthos is the island I was referring to. It's an illegal dumping ground, and even the EU has fined them for it. Also Kalymnos has a decades-old issue with burning trash - they even call it "trash volcano". Lots of other islands also have illegal dumping issues. Also many nature areas in mainland Greece are not in the most pristine state, often littered with junk, often junk that you can tell has been there for a long time. Whenever I went exploring by car, we would find the most beautiful areas but almost always trash everywhere :( Maybe it's gotten better though, I haven't been back since 2019, though I'm not sure I really want to.

[0] https://www.thenationalherald.com/arsonists-run-amok-in-athe...

tbossanova 1 day ago|||
Sort of interesting, yes. But it’s human nature to put more effort into something you might have some influence over rather than something you don’t. Possibly doing more of the former could lead to the latter being more feasible
Yeul 2 days ago|||
Honest question. Is Sicily actually economically important enough for such an expensive mega bridge? To my mind it would make more sense to invest that money in Milan.
rafram 2 days ago|||
Why invest in the region that’s already developed when you can invest in one that still has room to grow? That’s the meaning of investment. It seems likely that Sicily is poorer, in part, because of the lack of a bridge to the continent.
BurningFrog 2 days ago|||
The opposite angle is that investing is a well functioning region gives better results that investing in a corrupt and dysfunctional one.

To figure out which angle is more correct, you need to consider facts about the specific regions.

Yeul 2 days ago|||
But Milan is a sure bet? You know that you'll make the money back.

Backwards regions are subsidised by the cities. Sicily can be made into a tourist resort for pensioners.

lossyalgo 1 day ago||
Only if Sicily can somehow make water magically appear (I won't bother linking any articles, as there are literally hundreds in the last 2-3 years about the utter lack of water and suffering of Sicilians).

Or perhaps building a bridge will enable them to bring water in easily from the mainland?

easyThrowaway 12 hours ago||
The water issues are less due to actual desertification (it's a contributing factor too, of course) and more caused by the ancient and perpetually leaking pipes infrastructure. Way more compromised on the weastern side than on the opposite part.

Speaking with the experience of someone who has spent a good half of his life on that island: Sicily's problems are mainly due to the following factors, in this order: culture and mismanagement. Everything else (yes, including the organized crime) comes in a very, very distant third place.

bobthepanda 1 day ago||||
There already is investment. Milan just opened a new metro line to its airport over the past couple years; and the new Turin to Lyon tunnel will allow Milan to Paris in 4h30 compared to 7h today.
IncreasePosts 2 days ago||||
What would you build with $20B near Milan? Also, it's not like Northern Italy is forgotten when it comes to government investment. The Brenner Base Tunnel is being built there which will probably cost on the order of $15B or more.

Per-capita GDP is very low for Sicily relative to other regions - but it still has an overall GDP of around $100B, which is similar to Costa Rica or Croatia. Giving it a car/rail connection to the mainland would be a huge boon for the region and Italy in general.

linhns 2 days ago|||
With its potential and location and it’s well worth it.
gsf_emergency_4 1 day ago|||
There's been suggestions to use the military as construction labour

https://youtu.be/ei-bG4XfB4s

KurSix 2 days ago|||
Feels like no one really wants a solution
ta1243 2 days ago||
Sounds very similar to HS2 in the UK
sdoering 2 days ago||
Or the Fehmarn Belt tunnel (northern Germany to Denmark).

Or probably most of those big infrastructure construction projects.

GeoAtreides 2 days ago|||
Not sure why you added the Fehmarn Belt tunnel, there are no rumors or news of being mismanaged or going over the budget or being behind schedule.
bobthepanda 1 day ago|||
https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/fehmarnbelt-delayed-...

> Sund & Bælt, the Danish transport company overseeing the project, has now confirmed that IVY has not yet completed full testing and has not received final approvals from relevant authorities, despite arriving on site last October. The preparatory delay is about 18 months, a setback that project managers say makes meeting the original 2029 opening target difficult.

> There is also an issue with restrictions around the working conditions. Contracts for the main construction works were signed in 2016, before German planning approval had been granted. That timing meant certain later-imposed requirements – notably restrictions on underwater noise from work vessels and limits on sediment spill in German waters – were not written into the original contracts, complicating attempts to speed up work now that the rules are in place.

rurban 1 day ago||||
Over budget, decades behind schedule because Germany does everything to rise costs and delay. First they sunk the bridge project, now they delay the tunnel project. See the Wikipedia page.
zeristor 2 days ago|||
Hadn’t they designed a bridge, they were getting ready to build it, and it was changed to a tunnel.

It does make sense since tunnels won’t need to closed for high winds like bridges do.

I might have misremembered bits of this.

IAmBroom 2 days ago||
You're describing a perfectly normal and healthy development arc.

An initial study into a problem poses a preferred solution.

Time and effort is put into deep study of the solution path. Unfortunately, in this case the study proves it is far less ideal than initially assumed.

The project is switched to Plan B.

Granted, sometimes this kind of early change in direction is for dumb or dishonest reasons, but one cannot perfectly know the results before the studies are completed.

I am in rail design. We are currently designing things for needs in 2030-2060. The world is complicated.

mschuster91 2 days ago||||
At least this one is getting built, similar to the Brenner Base Tunnel in the South - the common thing tying both projects together is Deutsche Bahn, the federal parliament and the local parliaments being unable to get their asses together and expand the regional tracks to be able to carry the extended traffic that both these tunnels enable.
cenamus 2 days ago||
But is Germany even deeply involved there? I thought construction was split between AT and IT.
mschuster91 2 days ago||
The BBT itself, no that's indeed (thank God) not handled by DB.

But the BBT also needs supporting infrastructure from Kufstein to Munich, the so called Brenner Nordzulauf [1], some of which (the Truderinger Spange) is also covered by the Ausbaustrecke 38 programme [2]. Unfortunately, the Brenner Nordzulauf has been hotly contested [3] with very good points being raised - among others, some of the route proposals run through nature protection reservates, people are skeptical of years worth of construction, noise, debris, rail and road blocks, and separation of entire areas by another rail track.

[1] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brenner-Nordzulauf

[2] https://www.bahnausbau-muenchen.de/projekt.html?PID=29

[3] https://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/ebersberg/brenner-basis...

hexbin010 2 days ago|||
And Berlin Airport

And the Edinburgh Tram Project

Future:

- Heathrow Third Runway (assuming the government meddle in it heavily)

- Lower Thames Crossing

arethuza 2 days ago||
The initial phase of the Edinburgh Trams project wasn't great - but I suspect everyone involved knew it was going to be difficult and it's the approach of getting the project started and once started it's difficult to kill (see Robert Moses for that strategy!).

However, it's now a good service, popular and the trams are probably going to be expanded to much more of the city?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edinburgh_Trams

Also the Queensferry Crossing bridge was built with relatively little fuss - there were some delays but those were down to some spells of very bad weather.

hexbin010 2 days ago||
As a taxpayer, I can't stomach such acceptance of incompetence and mismanagement and corruption in the UK, personally.

It was a "litany of avoidable failures" as the Hardie report explained.

It does look like a tremendous success now though (not financially though. A double whammy for the taxpayer). The ends justify the means I guess?

arethuza 2 days ago||
Indeed, I wasn't trying to defend the management of the trams project - which did seem a farce.

Mind you - the investigation into the trams itself took far longer than expected and cost far more than anyone thought it should...

hexbin010 1 day ago||
> the investigation into the trams itself took far longer than expected and cost far more than anyone thought it should

It's like the dessert coming out after the buffet! Doubles all round!

AntonTrollback 2 days ago||
I've been on this train. The sound of the train being pulled onto the ferry did wake me up to say the least. It was dark outside and the blinds were shut in our sleeping coach. I remember feeling a bit of a weight, being in bed, in a closed coach, inside a large train, deep inside this massive ferry with many floors above us. It wasn't until much later that I realized that the train was open-air and not that big at all. You then wake up a few hours later near Palermo where the train runs just by the ocean – that was lovely.

I've also been on the second-to-last train of this type a few times (Snälltåget from Sweden via Denmark to Germany). That one also got canceled for the same reason – mega bridge construction (Fehmarn Belt). There, you used to get off the train to go up to the canteen for lunch with the truckers.

jcattle 2 days ago||
In the case of the Fehmarn belt it's an underwater bridge though.
tuukkah 2 days ago||
I think some consider the Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link to consist of multiple parts, as the main tunnel (Fehmarn Belt Tunnel proper) is between a German island and a Danish island so stops a bit short. On the Danish side, they rebuild the Storstrøm Bridge, and on the German side they decided to build another tunnel alongside the existing Fehmarn Sound Bridge. So in total, one existing bridge, one rebuilt bridge, one short new tunnel and one long new tunnel will connect Germany proper to Denmark proper.
jonp888 2 days ago||
It was trains from Hamburg to Copenhagen used to run on the Fehmarn Ferry until the line was shut for reconstruction, they now run via Padborg.

The Snalltaget sleeper train from Berlin to Malmo used to run on the ferry from Sassnitz to Trelleborg avoiding Denmark altogether, that stopped because the ferries don't run on that route any more, and the train also runs via Padborg.

rob74 2 days ago||
They seem to have missed one key detail in the title: this is the last European passenger train that travels by sea - or rather, the last ferry crossing that carries passenger carriages (I doubt that they carry the engine across by ferry?). There are (AFAIK) several other ferry lines that carry freight carriages, among them the Rostock-Trelleborg line served by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS_Sk%C3%A5ne
criemen 2 days ago|
> I doubt that they carry the engine across by ferry?

I don't know about this specific instance, but the Germany-Denmark train-on-a-ferry carried the whole Diesel-powered train, engine and all. It drove onto the ferry on its own, and left it on its own as well.

hydrogen7800 1 day ago||
It's not longer than the ferry?
criemen 12 hours ago|||
No - it's a rather short train, only a few carriages, and the engine is mostly integrated into the carriages I believe.
lmm 1 day ago|||
They decouple/shunt the carriages so they're alongside each other rather than having to fit them all in end to end.
criemen 12 hours ago||
This is not true, on the route Denmark/Germany there was no decoupling involved - the train drives onto the ferry, and drives off the ferry afterwards.
jvvw 2 days ago||
The first ever night train I went, about 25 years ago, on was from Berlin to Malmo. Early morning, I woke up to the feeling of my bed swaying and looking out of the window realised 'hang on, they've put the train on a ferry'.

I had no idea that trains got put on ferries, although I had been puzzled by the way the route on the route map crossed the sea but had assumed it was just to make the diagram simpler. It was quite a surreal thing finding myself unexpectedly on a train on a ferry. It was nice though as you could go and wander round the ferry and it was quite fun seeing it go off the ferry which had special train tracks on it onto the normal train tracks on the land.

cbdevidal 2 days ago||
I enjoyed the writing but the few photos left me curious about the ferry transfer. 34-minute video:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BA_2p5RUbe8

davidw 2 days ago||
I took that train many years ago. At least back then it was faster to get off the train in Calabria, hop on whatever local ferry was next, and then grab another train in Sicily, depending on your destination. In my case it was Catania to visit a friend.
swiftcoder 2 days ago||
What a delightful technological artefact. Certainly a shame to lose it, even if the bridge would be more convenient/efficient in the long run
AntonTrollback 2 days ago|
There might have been occasions where a train ferry transported one of those train that carry cars onboard. I like that thought.
mackman 2 days ago||
The transit version of a turducken.
IAmBroom 2 days ago||
Ferrtrainen?
jimnotgym 2 days ago||
I can see why this is worthwhile for a freight train, it takes a long time to unload goods onto a boat and offload them the other side. But why does it make sense for passengers? Is it just because they were doing it with freight already?
KurSix 2 days ago||
You board a train in Milan and wake up in Sicily without ever having to drag your luggage across terminals, onto buses, or through port checkpoints. Especially for night trains, that seamlessness adds a kind of magic
wongarsu 2 days ago|||
Passengers are more time-sensitive than freight. For a 20 minute ferry crossing, having everyone and their luggage disembark the train, go on a ferry, disembark the ferry and board a train would easily double the travel time of the crossing. It would also be far less convenient
throwawayffffas 2 days ago||
Passengers have luggage, you don't need a second train on the other side.
discoinverno 1 day ago|
My family is from Sicily, and I remember taking this train every year when I was a kid. After several years, I took it again last summer and was bufflled at how inefficient the whole ordeal was... Basically you have to wait for the train wagons to be detached and reassembled on the other side, you easily waste a couple hours.

Now, I don't really mind this, it's a bit of a tradition if you want, but I asked a relative of mine who used to work for the Italian national train company, and he told me that this train works like this cause in the past all the Sicilian migrants would travel with a lot of luggage, and it would be very impractical for them to transfer all of that twice. Nowadays this is not really the case anymore.

More comments...