Posted by anigbrowl 3 days ago
I think you’ll find most of the small teams making popular indie video games aren’t going to be interested in winning a pro-AI award.
Are you sure? Maybe not in gaming, but I'm sure most large companies create awards just to get them and mention them in marketing.
I wouldn't be surprised if the likes of EA and Ubisoft create a "best use of AI in gaming" award for next year.
What's the maximum developer count? Do outsourced assets count, if so, how? By the amount of people who directly worked on the assets by the outsource company or the whole headcount?
they had a whole orchestra of the size of whole indie game studios for the music alone, does that seem like indie?
Not if it's against the rule. They got caught with skidmarks. And while the "Ackshually, those skidmarks are just placeholders"-defense may elicit a few cheap laughs, it doesn't matter if you follow the rule to its logical conclusion. Any possible deception in such cases comes on top of it. As it always has; that doesn't change just because you found a new plaything (LLMs) in the box.
If a game is well made and people enjoy it then what's the problem with utilising AI generated code or assets? What's the objective?
Looks like "regulations nitpicking". In the end it doesn't represent the players best interests.
Before we know it we will have entrusted a lot to AI and that can be both a good or a bad thing. The acceleration of development will be amazing. We could be well on our way to expand into the universe.