Top
Best
New

Posted by azhenley 1 day ago

I canceled my book deal(austinhenley.com)
591 points | 329 commentspage 3
Roark66 14 hours ago|
Good to hear you decided to self publish. Don't let people online put too much pressure on you (is it done yet?)

On the subject of AI. I'm a great believer in that AI is a huge force for good (gives a single individual a huge power). I've been using every popular commercial and open weights models there are. I know their strengths and weaknesses.

But I think there will always be a need for human book writers. Just like there will be a need for human programmers. Although for different reasons. With software, humans are needed, because AI is still very, very far from being able to grasp actual, overall architecture of even modest sized hobby class projects (there is a special "trick" that is used to convince us otherwise, notice all very impressive examples are almost always "one shot" small prompts, with not a lot of refinement later. That almost never happens in real projects. In fact the opposite.)

With books, the AI is good explaining small chunks of knowledge. But an entire book, that is fun to read, consistent, and has a plan of "reader advancing in capability" through chapters and has some of the author's personality? No way.

Will I buy the book? I don't know. I have built a small library of physical books over the years (maybe about 200 books). But I also have about 50 of them on my kindle. I tend to buy an ebook first. If I really like it I buy a physical copy.

But I'm definitely reading a lot less than i used to. I've been working from hone exclusively since 2016. Before that I did a lot of commuting and that provided an opportunity of time to read loads of books. I certainly do not miss the airports, the budget airlines, the crowded trains and underground, but the reading took a big hit.

I imagine I'm not the only one. So the market for books probably shrunk substantially in the last decade.

milancurcic 1 day ago||
Thanks for sharing. I always enjoy reading author-publisher process articles as they get to the true behind the scenes story. I can relate to most things mentioned, and the terms seem identical to what I had when writing Modern Fortran with Manning. I also started with the intent to write for experts, but the publisher pushed for targeting beginners. The author can concede or (usually) give up the project.

One important aspect to this is that a typical first-book technical author knows well the subject matter, and sometimes knows how to write too (but usually not, as was my case), but does not know how to edit, typeset, publish, market, and sell well. That's what the publisher knows best. And of course, they want sales, and they understand that overall beginner books sell better than advanced/expert level books.

I encourage the author to continue writing and self-publish, and at a later time a publisher come to package and market a mostly finished product.

sedatk 1 day ago||
I'm glad that I released my book in 2022 before AI-hype took off. I'm familiar with the type of publisher mentioned in the article too. Those are very strict in their format and content guidelines, and I had also felt that such constraints were limiting at times. I can relate. But, I also learned a lot from the process, and in the end, my book got fantastic feedback. It became one of the print bestsellers in 2022, and got translated to many languages. I've found the whole experience positive.

But, I totally understand author's reasoning, and it's one of the reasons I want to explore different publishers as I want to deviate from writing strictly technical books.

kburman 1 day ago||
I'm curious about the economics of canceling a deal like this. Since the editor spent significant time reviewing the drafts, did the contract require you to reimburse the publisher for those costs or return the advance?
zerocrates 20 hours ago|
They never got the advance because they didn't get to the first milestone.
syntaxing 1 day ago||
This was quite a fun read and I appreciate the insight. A couple of my peers have suggested me to write a “stuff you should know” book. Some technical in nature (like linear algebra. It blows my mind how many engineers hardware or software do not understand linear algebra) and some not technical (why stuff cost the way they do. “Why does this cost $200 when I can make it for $20!”). But reading your post was encouraging to see that self publishing for fun might be the way to go. Though I guess people would argue you can just ask a LLM now instead of reading my book.
bigstrat2003 1 day ago||
> Though I guess people would argue you can just ask a LLM now instead of reading my book.

I would certainly not argue that. LLMs do not understand anything, and are thus prone to non-deterministic inaccuracies in their output. Due to that, I think it is extremely foolish to use one for learning unfamiliar topics. Give me a book every time, because (if it's a good book) I am guaranteed to actually learn something. Not so with LLMs.

trinix912 5 hours ago||
Additionally, no matter how good LLMs get, they're always going to prioritize the most cookie cutter answers to questions because they're looking for the "best match" - the most common answer.

With books the author can give advice that's not as widely known and is thus much less likely to show up in an LLM output.

jimnotgym 1 day ago|||
I think I could ask an LLM to explain linear algebra. I think it would be less good at the 'here are some things you should know' aspect. One reason for this is that people might not ask, but the LLM might not agree with your list anyway.

I think there is still a place for a book here. I think I might buy a book (or may have done 10 years ago when I was still coding) of things you should know (especially from a respected publisher), that being a longer form book I could work through over time.

soperj 1 day ago|||
that'll only be the case if you actually write the book so that the LLMs have that info. Until then they can't regurgitate your know-how.
dbalatero 1 day ago|||
Why should I know linear algebra, ooc?
nickpsecurity 1 day ago||
Udemy and Coursera both have Math for Machine Learning courses that start with Linear Algebra. Then, Calculus and Probability and Statistics. They're often $25-50.

You might want to look at their outlines to see what they're teaching. Then, decide if you can do something similar and/or cheaper.

__mharrison__ 1 day ago||
I've published books with two publishers and many self-published books (Anthropic owes me around $60K for book theft by my calculations).

Publishers can be great, but if you want control of your book, just self-publish it.

The most valuable (IMO) service publishers provide is feedback. If you have a small online presence, it isn't hard to get feedback from others.

manicennui 1 day ago||
Are the people who are really into "AI" even buying books anymore?
didip 1 day ago||
You didn’t share the complete deal details but just from what you shared, it seems like the payout is not worth it for this big of an effort.

What if you self publish yourself using Amazon toolings? Will the numbers be worse? At least you will be in charge of your own quality and deadlines.

bruce511 1 day ago|
For most books, but technical non-fiction in particular, the payout isn't nearly worth enough for the effort.

And by "most" there I mean "all". Yes, there are exceptions, but those exceptions prove the rule.

I've written 2 technical books, for incredibly niche audiences, where the total number of potential buyers is numbered in the low thousands.

I self published as a PDF. and charge $200 a copy, of which I keep $200. It's -marginally- worth it. But the hourly rate is much lower than my day job.

The marketing benefit (as it affects my actual business in the same field) is likely real, but hard to measure. Still, having "written the book" opens doors, and brings credibility.

levocardia 1 day ago|||
Disagree, a blog that gets tens of thousands of unique visitors could clear huge numbers on KDP. Maybe your niche is too narrow (probably, given your TAM is in the thousands) but this post is about "timeless programming projects" and is going to be extremely broad. The number of hits to the blog is itself an indicator of a very big and very eager potential market.
jimnotgym 1 day ago||||
A mentor once told me, 'half of the effect of marketing is hard to measure, the other half you have no idea'
uxcolumbo 1 day ago|||
Do you have any links to your books? Can't see them in your profile.
d4rkp4ttern 1 day ago||
Amusingly, for a library [1] I’ve been building, 100% of the code is AI-written (with a huge number of iterations of course) and the ONLY part I wanted to write myself is the portion of the README that explains the thought process behind one of the features. It took a lot of thinking and iterations to come up with the right style and tone, and methodically explain the ideas in the right order.

Leaving that to an LLM would have been a frustrating exercise.

[1] https://github.com/pchalasani/claude-code-tools

skeeter2020 6 hours ago|
related to not using AI, the project list shared is actually right in the sweet-spot for current LLMs ability to generate decent code.
More comments...