Top
Best
New

Posted by ksec 5 hours ago

Apple testing new App Store design that blurs the line between ads and results(9to5mac.com)
206 points | 132 commentspage 2
CGMthrowaway 2 hours ago|
Do people actually use the app store? Are we not all just searching in spotlight and clicking the first app that comes up (as long as it has 100K/1mil+ downloads) ?
nabbed 4 hours ago||
>it probably helps increase click-through rates which ultimately boosts Apple’s revenue in its ads business

I assume that means it increases the number of times users install the wrong app (possibly with serious consequences)?

kibwen 4 hours ago|
Why should Apple give a shit? Companies like Apple are sociopathic profit-maximizers, and users are cattle to be milked and slaughtered.
ChrisMarshallNY 4 hours ago||
I find that's the case already. They also force you to go through their ad-splattered gauntlet, every time you reopen the app.

It's pretty much worthless, to me. I always use direct app links, from the developers' sites.

I shudder to think of it getting worse.

SkyPuncher 4 hours ago|
Every now and then, normally while I’m bored before departing on a plane, I’ll scroll the App Store. It’s all ads at this point. Lists and lists of “top [x]” most of which are clearly just paid lists.

I never visit the App Store outside of that. If I need an app, I search for it and go directly to its listing page (yes, technically the App Store) or install it directly from my Home Screen.

tfrancisl 4 hours ago||
Oh, so the Google playstore since... forever. Or at least as long as I can remember. If you have a "search" feature on your <anything app> it should filter down to exactly what you would expect, no sponsored positions, no irrelevant apps as ads, etc.

Shame apple is going towards the dark pattern of ads as results.

phreack 2 hours ago||
If an iPhone is going to be as bad as an Android like that then what's the point. The "premium" feeling is eroded like this.
avalys 4 hours ago||
Not obvious to me that this is worse or as user-hostile as many seem to presume.

Previously the blue background made the ad result look more highlighted and more prominent.

Now it is just like the other results - not special or better.

Yes, the HN audience knows the visual convention indicates that the blue background represents an ad. Does your everyday user know that or do they assume the blue results are better?

bigyabai 3 hours ago|
> Does your everyday user know that or do they assume the blue results are better?

Deceptive UI is the issue. By removing distinctions between ads and normal results, you're going from a frying pan situation straight into the fire.

b3ing 3 hours ago||
This will always be a thing, the click metrics dictate it and to justify the costs to the company advertising and the low # of clicks, something has to be done to save the new revenue Ads give. They might as well add modal (psudeo popup) ads, because they will be there in 15yrs.
seabass 3 hours ago||
Feels short sighted. Every such change gets me closer to ditching the ecosystem altogether.
JKCalhoun 5 hours ago|
En-something-ification…
ivell 3 hours ago|
En-adification. Or just adification. Can also use adified.
More comments...