> the bottleneck in AI-assisted development isn’t the quality of your ideas - it’s the quality of your feedback loops

if your intent is to produce the random bug-filled slop, then I guess so? don't get me wrong, the experiment is fun, but the conclusion is so laughably far-fetched.

I mean having a claw is kind of like having a pet. Only a matter of time until you get lazy to take him for a walk; and he has an accident.

And the most HN title award goes to...

I for one am all in on DiL (Dog in the Loop) engineering.

Wow, a great example of how vibe coding isn't coding.

You're just the random seed to the money furnace remixing existing games and code.

If ever I saw something that made me want to move to a log cabin the woods and never touch a computer again, this is it

snrf99777655;;+%hn

> The games got dramatically better not when I improved the prompt, but when I gave Claude the ability to screenshot its own work, play-test its own levels, and lint its own scene files.

... Why would it be able to evaluate whether the game is any fun to play?

Srsly, you need your pet in the feedback loop.

It has to produce a game that Momo wants to play.

Does Momo like to bark at cats? On screens? Introduce a bark sensor as feedback.

Or use a cat. Cats like to swipe at mice on TV. Get a touchscreen and evolve a game for cats.

Aw Momo's so cute!