> codespeak login

Instant tab close!

I would just like to point out the fun fact that instead of the brave new MD speak, there is still a `codespeak.json` to configure the build system itself...

...which seems to suggest that the authors themselves don't dogfood their own software. Please tell me that Codespeak was written entirely with Codespeak!

Instead of that json, which is so last year, why not use an agent to create an MD file to setup another agent, that will compile another MD file and feed it to the third agent, that... It is turtles, I mean agents, all the way down!

I think stuff like Langflow and n8n are more likely to be adopted, alongside with some more formal specifications.

We created programming languages to direct programs. Then created LLM's to use English to direct programs. Now we've create programming languages to direct LLM's. What is old is new again!

The tweet I saw a few weeks ago about LLMs enabling building stupid ideas that would have never been built otherwise particularly resonates with this one.

Another great way to shrink your codebase 10x? Rewrite it in APL. If less code means less information, what are we gonna do when missing information was important?

Alas, I thought I invented this.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47284030

As someone who hates writing (and thus coding) this might be a good tool, but how’s is it different from doing the same in claude? And I only see python, what about other languages, are they also production grade?