Top
Best
New

Posted by tosh 16 hours ago

MacBook Neo Deep Dive: Benchmarks, Wafer Economics, and the 8GB Gamble(www.jdhodges.com)
230 points | 257 comments
beloch 36 minutes ago|
>"~1.5-2GB of available application memory (after macOS overhead)."

Having an OS eat up >75% of your memory on a fresh boot is not ideal. You're gambling on macOS experiencing zero bloat for the lifetime of this product. If the OS memory footprint grows even just a few percent, users of this model will lose a significant portion of available memory for applications.

This model might trigger planned obsolescence legislation in some jurisdictions.

dudefeliciano 15 minutes ago||
> might trigger planned obsolescence legislation

then i welcome it

throawayonthe 30 minutes ago||
i think it's a fair concern, but quite frankly right now macos has best-in-class (desktop) memory/swap management
remix2000 13 minutes ago|||
Source…? I see this claim thrown around so much without any backing and my experience with mac os (and other darwin variants) is just terrible. My previous portable was a 2015 mac book pro with 16 (!) gigs of ram (mind-blowing for 2026 standards, I know) and the os just became terribly and unbearably sluggish with all the useless updates (that nb mostly removed features, e.g. ClearType was wiped off the face of the Earth in back in mac os Mojave) caking on, at some point I just gave up on trying to fix it with continuously reinstalling and balancing it. My current portable has quarter the amount of workmem and is just incredibly snappy esp. compared to that mac book. And I don't even use portables for anything too heavy, I have an actual PC for that.
zozbot234 25 minutes ago|||
Compared to Windows or Android, sure. Hopefully the Asahi folks will get around to supporting this device so we can run a proper lightweight OS on it.
Retr0id 19 minutes ago||
Unfortunately Linux is pretty damn bad under memory pressure, I think you'd get an objectively better experience on macOS. I say this as someone running Asahi right now.
nottorp 4 minutes ago||
Hmm besides the 8 Gb being there mostly for market segmentation...

Does this mean the Neo/Air aren't useful for lightweight gaming at all? Lightweight as in indie-ish games, not as in session length.

darkteflon 13 hours ago||
I bought an 8gb M1 Air in 2020 (for what now feels like an absurdly small sum of money) as an experiment in how-cheap-is-too-cheap / chuckable travel laptop. I ended up using it as my main laptop for 2 years without regret, then handed it to my son for school.

It remains in perfect condition and as delightful to use as the day I bought it (Apple software snafus notwithstanding). I fully expect to get at least 10 years use out of it. Honestly, I feel like it could probably carry him all the way through school - but I’d be embarrassed to say that out loud since that’s another 9 years.

epistasis 12 hours ago||
I've been on my M1 Air, 16GB, since a few weeks after launch, more than six years now. I still use it daily with lots of Docker containers, VS Code, tons of Electron apps, a small macOS arm VM, and lots of browser tabs simultaneously. Recently, Claude's VM environment is getting exercised simultaneously. Usually the memory pressure is into yellow, but responsiveness is still far higher than any Mac from the Intel days, and far more usable than any Windows laptop that I have the misfortune to experience when borrowing somebody else's computer. And despite all that memory pressure, my SSD isn't getting worn out by swapping, I'm at only "3%" of SSD wear, if those stats on the CLI are to be trusted.

I'm not sure I'll need another computer anytime soon. Even though the kids jumped on it once when I left it on the couch for a few minutes, bending the case on one side of the keyboard. It bent back mostly flat. Gives it a bit of personality.

Never before has $1099 (or whatever) of hardware gone so far for me.

KronisLV 32 minutes ago|||
I got the 8 GB version of the M1 Mac Book air for a freelance stuff where I had to ship stuff for iOS as well. Really wish I had gone for the 16 GB version, since I had no idea just how bad the memory situation would eventually get. That said, it’s at least a good little computer for me being on the move!
ako 1 hour ago||||
Same with the iPad Air m1, handles everything you throw at it, does video editing, office, etc. Connected to an external display and keyboard feels like a full laptop, on the couch is the best consumption device. And with Claude it can handle your coding sessions.
mghfreud 56 minutes ago||
How do you use iPad for coding?
wiseowise 12 hours ago||||
And you forgot the best part: it is completely silent.
tcoff91 5 hours ago|||
The quiet isn’t even the best part of passive cooling. It’s that the cooling will never stop working due to dust clogging fans.
hbs18 3 hours ago||
Surely the thermal paste will degrade at some point, right?
sysguest 31 minutes ago||
well it's really difficult to get internal temperature even to 70 celsius...
refactor_master 8 hours ago||||
Still baffles the mind that Apple solved this issue some 20+ years ago, and others _still_ haven't. I remember being basically surrounded by jet engines running Word in school.

A few years ago in an old job I got a monster-specced Dell laptop, and it would still roar if I opened anything. I had to pull all the nerf tricks through the BIOS to at least keep it somewhat tolerable in low-load scenarios (i.e. most of the workday).

wqaatwt 4 hours ago|||
> Apple solved this issue some 20+ years ago

All the i7/i9 Macbook pros that I used back in the day were obnoxiously load. Even when not under particularly heavy load.

AnthonyMouse 3 hours ago||||
A fanless CPU needs more, lower-clocked cores to have the same multi-thread performance as an actively cooled CPU with fewer cores, and higher core count CPUs cost more. So you only get a fanless CPU if you either a) get a low multi-thread performance CPU or b) pay for a high-performance CPU and then get only medium performance out of it by running it fanless. Notice that even Apple's highest performance laptops have fans; fanless there isn't a thing.

But Apple's fanless machines do b) and then they just charge you the premium. There are a few fanless PC laptops that do the same thing, but most people don't want that, because they'd rather save a significant amount of money by getting the same performance out of a less expensive CPU with a fan.

freehorse 46 minutes ago||
This is oversimplified. It is sustained multithreaded performance that brings throttling with fanless cpu. Anything for a short enough amount of time is fine, and sustained single threaded stuff is also fine. Bursts are also fine. A lot of work that people do on a computer is fine. Fanless doesn't really hurt unless you process large amounts of data in parallel for some time. Performance in a cpu does not only show in this kind of tasks.

I have used both airs and the max versions of macbooks, and the airs are embarrassingly on par for too many things. I understand it may be hard to believe, but one can do actual, serious work on a macbook air.

Of course one could say that having a fan is always optional anyway (like the older 13" macbook pro was mostly an air with a fan) and in these types of tasks you may barely hear it. But still I prefer the peace of not ever hearing a fan for my to-go laptop.

socalgal2 1 hour ago|||
I wish I lived in the reality. My 2014 MBP and 2019 MBP’s fans come on quick and loud
SXX 1 hour ago||
Apple silicon is only been around for 5+ years, but people tend to forget how bad Intel macs overheated, throttled and hand tons of other thermal related issues.
epistasis 11 hours ago||||
I did forget, because a silent laptop is now table stakes for me. I can't imagine buying anything with an audible fan again. I'd rather stay on the hardware I have.
bee_rider 5 hours ago||
I wouldn’t want a fan on a Windows laptop, for sure. On Linux they are fine as long as the lowest speed is “off,” since they’ll only kick on if you explicitly ask the computer to do something crunchy.
teaearlgraycold 11 hours ago|||
I appreciate a light whoosh from a laptop.
overfeed 1 hour ago|||
No fan = leaving performance on the table due to lacking thermal headroom.
wiseowise 1 hour ago||
If I wanted maximum performance I would use a desktop.
__patchbit__ 30 minutes ago||
When the M5 Mac Mini Pro 64GB RAM and more release, I'd like to seamlessly mesh the Neo to the Mini the way Plan 9 imagined. And, a payment would be all that you need to expand on the cloud.

Happy to see Gerbil Scheme occupies 4GB RAM use on the Neo while building.

HerbManic 5 hours ago|||
I have no problem if it is the occasional spin up, but it is rare to have system that can do just that.

My Thinkpads seem to only use the fan occasionally but then my work load is very light.

davnicwil 12 hours ago||||
a bit of an aside but what's amazing is that Docker's recent beta VM for Mac (I think released a couple of months ago now) has dramatically improved the performance you get out of your CPU.

Using a macbook air, even a recent one, before this Docker was definitely usable but noticably slower. Probably still worth it but a noticable tradeoff using it as a dev machine Vs a pro. Now that tradeoff has basically gone away.

stodor89 11 hours ago||||
Entry-spec M1 Air is the best computer ever made.

I can't stand Apple, but it's the truth. I used one sporadically to build my stuff for Mac. Going back to my Windows workstation after that always felt like travelling 15 years back in time. I recommended M1 Air to everyone whose workflow was compatible with a Mac. Most of the people who acted on that recommendation still use it and don't really think about upgrading.

paustint 10 hours ago||||
I had a ton of issues with my Macbook pro M1 16GB, memory pressure would be in the yellow always and into red frequently which caused sound stutter and all sorts of issues.

My M1 air (I think 8GB?) had similar issues My M2 24gb was amazing - especially since it allowed dual monitors. I recently upgraded to the M4 32GB and it is my "do everything" computer and is absolutely awesome.

My personal experience with the m-series is that get as memory as possible. I do feel the M1 had issues based on the couple I owned.

EDIT: Even on 32GB my memory pressure is constantly in the yellow, but have not seen it go to red

astrange 9 hours ago||
Memory pressure sort-of means something sort-of doesn't. It's certainly possible that critical pressure could cause audio issues, but it could also be impossible to ever notice.

More importantly you shouldn't be experiencing audio stalls, so complain in the feedback app if you do.

interludead 5 hours ago|||
My concern with the Neo is that it may have the same "feels impossible for the price" quality early on, but the 8GB ceiling gives it much less room to become the kind of absurd long-lived machine your Air turned into
invalidSyntax 4 hours ago||
You can't change the RAM, so using it as a student, and then use it as a reliable sub pc in the future might make it last long.
skiing_crawling 3 hours ago|||
I bought a 8gb m1 air just a few days ago to use as a travel laptop. The 8gb gives me memory anxiety coming from my 48gb m4, but it did force me to turn off some settings I never liked (siri, spotlight indexing) and I also discovered zed, ghostty, and orbstack to replace vscode, iterm, and docker desktop.

The memory limit is probably in my head now, it does pretty well as long as I'm not obsessing over activity monitor.

SXX 1 hour ago|||
Mine M1 Air display just failed after 5+ years out of the blue like worked at night and stopped in morning and even pre-used LCD assembly cost $200-300. So repairing makes no financial sense.

Yet considering the price I've paid for it like $0.5 per day and used it daily for 10-16 hours a day. Pretty much like phones I use except I use them much less and drop them often unlike a macbook.

elAhmo 58 minutes ago|||
Similar story here, I used the original M1 Air 8GB for for years, still in same great condition without any flaws. I did get a M4 Air last year because I just needed more than one display and wanted to work in a docked mode, and I have similar feelings with this machine too.
rootnod3 11 hours ago|||
Same. Recently bought myself a M2 Air as a birthday gift for myself. 8GB, chucked OpenBSD on it and couldn't be happier. It does what I need, battery lasts long and easy to chuck around.
locusofself 10 hours ago|||
TIL you can run OpenBSD on apple silicon. With how much effort has gone into Asahi Linux, I'm surprised.
Rediscover 8 hours ago|||
OpenBSD has had support for a bit over four years (v7.1, though the earlier v7.0 had /some/ support).

OpenBSD 7.1, 2022-04-21 -- https://www.openbsd.org/71.html

R/AsahiLinux posting from around that time, only one comment -- https://www.reddit.com/r/AsahiLinux/comments/u8rb2o/openbsd_...

rootnod3 1 hour ago||||
Only M1 and M2 machines though. M3 and up is still missing.
SXX 1 hour ago|||
Running anything on Apple Silicon is result of Asahi Linux effort.
jrmg 10 hours ago|||
It has no graphics acceleration, right? Doesn’t windowing feel sluggish?
rootnod3 1 hour ago||
99% of the time I run dwm + emacs, most of the browsing in eww. The occasional 1% that I run a browser is negligible. The scrolling lag doesn't bother me too much. I basically run it as a distraction free machine with long battery life.

No temptation to open Youtube or other distractions.

Just an emacs session with code and notes. Forcing myself to read the man-pages first before googling anything.

tim333 2 hours ago|||
I also got a M1 Air 8gb, bought 2021 and it's good but there's been various hardware go wrong - screen packed up, usb ports packed up, speakers knackered, battery says service. I think 10 years use would require quite a lot of fixing on mine.
satvikpendem 11 hours ago|||
I wouldn't be embarrassed, Apple computers hold their value and performance for a remarkable amount of time, and that was even before Apple Silicon, which, as I'm still running an M1 Pro machine, will last quite a while, another several years yet.
donkeylazy456 5 hours ago||
I have m1 pro mbp with 32gig ram too. I've never thought to upgrade my laptop and still.
kevmo314 5 hours ago|||
Same, the Apple silicon chips have been huge.

I bought a 2019 Intel MBP and that was by far the worst laptop I've ever had. After just a year of use it was constantly overheating and running out of memory and disk space, barely able to open a terminal. It was so bad that I hesitated to buy the Apple silicon versions, but the good reviews convinced me and it has been going strong ever since.

Gigachad 5 hours ago|||
Since the M1, macbooks pretty much hit "good enough". I've got a 2021 macbook and a top of the line 2025 model from work as well. But the experience using them is pretty much exactly the same, the newer one is many multiples the performance, but my old one does everything instantly. So I can't tell the difference just using it normally.
tomwphillips 3 hours ago|||
I was in a similar boat with my M1 Pro. I have an M4 Pro for work but rarely notice the difference.

Unfortunately the display in my M1 has failed and a replacement is £500-700. Very frustrating.

tracker1 12 hours ago|||
I bumped up to 16gb ram and more storage... it's still running great for when I use it, which is not much tbf... I mostly use my desktop because my vision has gotten exceedingly bad the past few years and my 45" desktop displays are significantly easier for me to read and use... I can kind of manage with the M1 display set to max size/scale... but many apps and sites are problematic.
Fr0styMatt88 5 hours ago||
Have you tried the screen zoom in accessibility settings? The responsiveness is great with the trackpad gestures.
tracker1 4 hours ago||
I haven't... Should probably look into it. I always hated Windows full screen zoom... But I regularly use the triple tap zoom in Android. I'll look into it next time.
s0rce 12 hours ago|||
I had an M1 pro with the touchbar thing that I bought used for <$1000 after I had to give my work one back when I changed jobs. It was the best upgrade I ever made. I cracked the screen and bought a M4 air on black friday for $750 or something which I'm using now.
steve_adams_86 12 hours ago|||
I have a 2017 MacBook Air that's still going strong and will certainly hit 10 years. It definitely won't hit another 9 years after that, though... The keyboard doesn't have that much life left in it, and I won't be repairing it.
interludead 5 hours ago||
I think 8GB is harder to defend in 2026 than it was in 2020, but maybe Apple's low-end machines may be staying useful long after the spec sheet says they shouldn't...
Gigachad 4 hours ago||
Ram is massively more expensive in 2026 than it was in 2020. And the tasks the average person does hasn't changed in that time. I think it could be a good thing that Apple is setting a baseline that your apps should run with 8gb, there isn't a good reason you couldn't work with that amount.
lifestyleguru 3 hours ago||
> And the tasks the average person does hasn't changed in that time.

Absolutely untrue. Your 2020 CV makes you completely unemployable in 2026.

wlesieutre 13 hours ago||
> The I/O is also a genuine limitation: one USB 2.0 port is functionally useless for data transfer, no Thunderbolt means no fast external storage, and charging occupies your only USB 3 port.

You're supposed to use the USB-2 port for charging and save the USB-3 port for external accessories, not the other way around

It only supports 10Gb/s compared to 40 that USB-4 is theoretically capable of, but that's more than enough for anyone in the $600 laptop market.

njovin 5 hours ago||
Anecdotally, and as a big fan of Apple laptops, I've had so much trouble with their USB and SDCard hardware when it comes to data transfer that I wonder if I'm cursed or if I'm crazy.

Transferring a about a dozen GB of data over USB3 is a crapshoot depending on the drive you have. Even amongst name-brands with similar advertised speeds, some thumb drives are basically useless with my 2024 MBP and I've had similar issues with a previous 2015 MBP model. The transfer speeds will be so slow as to be considered unusable.

On the 2024 MBP, using ANY microsd card adapter with any microsdcard causes the card to immediately overheat, and the card will never be properly usable by the OS. Only full-size SDCards work.

I've seen some posts about this elsewhere, but it seems to me like one of the few peripherals on this expensive piece of kit being incompatible with the vast majority of the hardware it's supposed to work with would be kind of a big deal.

chocochunks 12 hours ago|||
Yeah, but that USB 3 port has to do a lot of heavy lifting. It 's also the only video out port making decent dongles a necessity. On a $600 PC it's not uncommon to have USB A (at 3.0 speeds), HDMI in addition to USB C and maybe even Ethernet.
Gigachad 4 hours ago|||
>making decent dongles a necessity

I used a macbook air all throughout school, I never once owned a dongle or even plugged the thing in to an external monitor. My requirements were something that could run photoshop/illustrator and chrome. If I ever transfered something over USB it was a 300kb docx file or something else that would have copied instantly at 2.0 speeds.

I think there's a huge problem of tech enthusiasts projecting their own requirements on to a device that is designed for a very different person, and then declaring it unfit for use. Apple prioritized things that actually matter to students like battery life, lightness, price, and hinges that don't snap after the first year. Rather than tons of super fast IO and 32gb ram.

chocochunks 14 minutes ago||
I went to school too. Sometimes at school we would do presentations using a projector connected by HDMI, maybe you could get away with the room computer but that only had USB A ports being some ancient desktop. Sometimes we did group projects and rather than huddle around one tiny 13" or 15" laptop screen we used one of the big ass TVs in the rentable group study rooms.

It's not tons of super fast IO. It's pretty basic IO.

grey-area 4 hours ago||||
This cheap laptop is not for people with external displays. Almost everyone buying this would have no desire for an external display, they wouldn’t even feel this as a limitation.

If you want a separate display or super fast data transfers, more usb ports or more than 8MB of RAM buy one of the more expensive laptops.

happyopossum 10 hours ago||||
> On a $600 PC

Yes, but it is uncommon for a $600 PC to have a beautiful screen, great trackpad, metal case, and top notch build quality. Also, the neo performs really really well.

giantrobot 5 hours ago|||
A multi-port USB-C hub is about ten dollars on Amazon. If a Neo owner really needs additional ports they're a few bucks. For a vast majority of Neo owners the lack of ports is a non-issue and for the others that occasionally need the extra ports they're cheap.

I doubt there's many Neo buyers that really needed multiple Thunderbolt ports but decided to pick up the $600 entry level machine instead.

storus 12 hours ago|||
Both 10Gb/s and 8GB RAM limit come from iPhone 16 Pro chip limitations used in Neo. Next year's should have 12GB of RAM.
HDBaseT 11 hours ago||
If they can maintain the same price tag for A19 based Macbook Neo with 12GB of RAM, I genuinely do not know how other companies can compete.
bombcar 10 hours ago||
I’m waiting for the first A chip designed after the Neo decision - it’ll be interesting to see what they do knowing it’ll end up in a laptop. The obvious thing is “fixing” the USB problem.
stirlo 13 hours ago|||
It’s a bizarre take.

It’s not functionally useless, it supports a mouse, keyboard, printer or even an iPhone (non pro) perfectly fine at full speed. It also probably has enough speed for the average cheap terrible quality USB drive that the buyer of a $600 PC might have.

This is a Silicon Valley tech geek take not a real world one.

retired 12 hours ago|||
The assortment of cheap USB sticks I have do not surpass 400mbit/sec. Not even the ones labeled USB3.0 or High Speed.
mycall 6 hours ago||
That is good enough speed for plenty of use cases.
sixhobbits 6 hours ago|||
"genuinely" is an AI tell now as well as doing things in physical world that don't make sense like walking to the car wash to wash your car if it's close, or maybe not using USB ports in the way they were designed...
zitterbewegung 12 hours ago|||
Sometimes on HN while this is technically correct I wonder if Mac users will truly notice. This is probably a limitation of the A19 chip. Many people just see the price tag and buy.
jorisw 4 hours ago||
Yep. For me it was a perfect gift to replace moms 10+ year old Intel based MacBook Air.
interludead 5 hours ago|||
I agree that for the actual target market, 10Gb/s is probably not the thing that will make the machine feel limited
teaearlgraycold 11 hours ago|||
USB 2.0 speeds are still fine for 99% of my USB transfer needs.
washingupliquid 12 hours ago||
[flagged]
dang 10 hours ago|||
Could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments and flamebait? You've unfortunately been doing it repeatedly. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

coder543 12 hours ago||||
The computer pops up a warning if you plug a fast device into the slow port, which is a lot more informative for the average user than a tiny label that most users wouldn’t even read.

Labels would be nice, I guess, but their absence is hardly a dealbreaker.

washingupliquid 11 hours ago||
Windows has been showing popup USB speed warnings since at least Windows XP.... so 25 years?

Let's not use this cope to mislead anyone into thinking this is a unique Mac innovation (it isn't) that trumps this abomination of human factors (it doesn't).

coder543 11 hours ago||
I have never ever seen Windows provide this warning even once just because there is a faster port on the machine and the user plugged the device into the wrong one. Please provide a source for this claim that you are making. Citation absolutely needed.

In the unlikely case that this feature exists thanks to Microsoft, I would like to say that is great, because it is much more user friendly than only having tiny labels. But since I’ve never seen this feature work before, it seems to me that it must be broken, if it exists at all.

wlesieutre 11 hours ago|||
These warning messages do exist, at least for if your computer supports USB4 but not on that port, or thunderbolt / DP alternate mode but not on that port

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/u...

SecretDreams 11 hours ago|||
The OP might be remembering this (link) style of message from the Windows XP days. I don't think I've seen it for windows 7/10/11, sadly.

It will warn you if you're charging over the slower to charge port, though.

https://superuser.com/questions/1022542/windows-10-display-a...

retired 12 hours ago||||
You get a message on screen that you should be using the other port.

But yes, labeling should have been better. One of the USPs of MacBooks is that all USB ports are the same. Unlike other computers where you have to look where you are plugging it in. The Neo breaks that tradition.

QuercusMax 6 hours ago||
That was definitely not the case on one of the macbooks I had, which wouldn't charge properly on the right side if recall. Maybe one of the last Intel macbook pros?
_aavaa_ 12 hours ago||||
Do you think those same users know the difference between usb3, usb4, and thunderbolt (or even that all three exist)? More over, do you think they know how to tell cables apart for the three?
washingupliquid 12 hours ago||
$150 netbooks solved this by labeling the ports "SS" or using blue USB-A inserts, but those are matters inferior PC users have to deal with.
fredoliveira 12 hours ago|||
I legitimately have no idea what "SS" means next to a port, and I've seen it plenty of times. Labeling doesn't solve everything. The message on screen that you get when you plug something into the wrong port on the Neo is, obviously, much better because it assumes nothing about the user's knowledge except for the ability to read.
wlesieutre 11 hours ago|||
SuperSpeed, but you’re not supposed to use that as a consumer facing label anymore

> NOTE: USB4® Version 2.0, USB4® Version 1.0, USB 3.2, SuperSpeed Plus, Enhanced SuperSpeed and SuperSpeed+ are defined in the USB specifications however these terms are not intended to be used in product names, messaging, packaging or any other consumer-facing content.

USB-IF’s recommended name for this port is now just “USB 10Gbps”

Not that I would expect an average consumer to understand that as a label, but at least it takes up less space and allows relative comparisons better than USB 3.0 SuperSpeed+ or whatever the old equivalent was.

https://www.usb.org/sites/default/files/usb_data_performance...

stodor89 11 hours ago||||
> I legitimately have no idea what "SS" means next to a port

surströmming

auguzanellato 12 hours ago||||
> it assumes nothing about the user's knowledge except for the ability to read.

Sometimes I question whether some users have that ability

HDBaseT 11 hours ago||
Most people can read; it’s comprehending what they just read that’s the deal-breaker.
madars 12 hours ago|||
USB 3.0 was marketed as SuperSpeed USB. SS-marked ports should give you 5Gbit/s, compared to 480 Mbps USB 2.0.
rco8786 12 hours ago||||
I feel confident in saying that I am better at computers than 99.99% of the general population and I have no clue what “SS” or blue USB ports are supposed to indicate.
washingupliquid 12 hours ago||
[flagged]
retired 11 hours ago||
Apple never colored their ports because up until the Neo all ports were the same speed. No need to distinguish them.
washingupliquid 11 hours ago||
No need to distinguish ports when you can remove them all instead.
Schiendelman 12 hours ago|||
"Solved" - hardly. No one knows what those symbols mean.
wlesieutre 12 hours ago||||
Apple should show users an alert when they plug a USB-3 device into the USB-2 port because they are visually identical

Oh wait https://i.imgur.com/7HWgxZ1.png

I don't know the details of Apple's silicon designs, but I assume the USB port bandwidth is because this is using the chip from iPhone 16 Pro, a phone which of course had a single USB-3 port. They've done what they can with it to hit the price point.

The alternative was to not include a second USB port for charging, in which case people would be bitching about it not being able to use peripherals while charging like the last time they made a single port laptop.

maccard 11 hours ago|||
This is why standardising in USB c the connector was a mistake.
xelaboi 44 minutes ago||
The author clearly had some involvement in the article, I wish they could have written it themselves. It reads like they gave Claude some benchmark data and got it to write the rest of the article.
Aerolfos 41 minutes ago|
AI or not, it's such a bad article that constantly repeats itself and spends more time (and words) promising the upcoming sections and "deep insights" than it does on actually writing any of those facts.
quietthrow 4 hours ago||
Apple makes unbelievably good hardware and software that just lasts and just works. Until it’s 7 years old. After that you essentially have to chuck it as you don’t get any updates from Apple and slowly you descend into incompatibility unless you world exists in browser.

I wish once you bought an Apple computer it was truly yours for as long as you wanted it instead of it being dictated by Apple.

Still Great computers though.

d1sxeyes 4 hours ago||
It is yours for as long as you want it, and it (mostly) runs all the software it was compatible with when you first bought it (there are some quirks around software you had access to but didn't install, like Garageband, where you may no longer be able to access the original version). Stuff doesn't just 'stop working', as a rule, but the rest of the world does move on. I'm not sure what you think should be done about that? All software should always be backwards compatible with older versions forever?

As a reasonable alternative, you can stick Linux on it and it'll run nicely, although with a different set of software to what you got the laptop with. 2026 is the year of the Linux Desktop!1! (in all seriousness though, it is actually quite good by now).

gib444 2 hours ago||
> Stuff doesn't just 'stop working'

They didn't say that. In fact they said the total opposite

> As a reasonable alternative, you can stick Linux on it and it'll run nicely

Somewhat true for Intel

Not so true for Apple Silicon (Asahi are only upto M2 I think?)

keiferski 4 hours ago|||
I bought a 2015 iMac last year for 100 euros at a thrift store. It’s a bit slow but works fine for YouTube etc. And the computer itself basically looks good as new - the screen is really beautiful.

Thinking I’ll try and install Linux on it at some point.

nolist_policy 1 hour ago|||
As a data point: Chromebooks get 10 years of updates.
dmos62 2 hours ago||
Fruit Construction Inc. makes great houses. Wish you could own them, but really great houses.
havaloc 14 hours ago||
I bought a Neo as an out of the house computer and it really is a triumph. If the Air is good enough for 99% of the population, the Neo as is approaches good enough for 90% of the population at half the cost.
interludead 5 hours ago|
As an out-of-the-house computer, or a second/hand-me-down laptop, that tradeoff makes a lot more sense
headcanon 14 hours ago||
My wife bought a Neo and has been very happy with it. I was wary of the 8gb memory limit but she is running claude code doing web development with a reasonable number of tabs open and no noticeable lag, so I'd say its definitely getting a lot of mileage out of it.

It honestly seems good enough that it might cannibalize Macbook Air sales.

crazygringo 14 hours ago||
It might be more likely that it cannibalizes used Macbook Air sales.
GeekyBear 13 hours ago|||
After years of incremental upgrades to the Airs, a new entry level M5 Air gives you double the RAM, double the storage, and double the CPU and GPU performance of an M1 Air.

Hopefully used Airs will come up for sale more frequently, as they remain a step up from the Neo.

adastra22 13 hours ago||
At double the price.
SXX 1 hour ago|||
I'm in no way Apple fan, but M5 air with 512GB SSD and 32GB RAM costs $1500. Compared to M1 and 256GB and 16GB at $1200.

Adjusted for inflation it pretty much the same.

GeekyBear 12 hours ago|||
Sure.

Used M1 Airs are selling for roughly half the price of a new Neo.

Octoth0rpe 13 hours ago|||
which seem to be out of stock in any case, so probably not a loss for apple.

https://www.apple.com/shop/refurbished/mac

bjelkeman-again 14 hours ago|||
I am running Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex and Docker Desktop on a last generation Intel Air, that admittedly has 12 GB RAM. One has to be a bit careful with more apps. But I look forward to an upgrade. Maybe a Neo, but more likely a second hand M.
bombcar 10 hours ago||
Whatever you do, do not try one out before you’re ready to buy.
majorchord 11 hours ago||
How on Earth did you find a wife who codes? Asking for a friend.
pvdebbe 1 hour ago|||
GP expressly said the wife does not code: she uses claude.
tomcam 9 hours ago|||
I can top that (he said bitterly). My wife is still gorgeous after 30+ years of marriage and is a 10x programmer. But she was happy when given the choice not to work when we married, and hasn’t touched a compiler in decades.

I did well in business, but the family joke is that I’d be a billionaire if I could have monetized her.

roody15 24 minutes ago||
One good thing about the 8gig Neo means that I think Apple will at least work to support M1 8gig for a few more years!!
jorisw 4 hours ago|
> There’s also a silver lining to the tight memory envelope: Apple has to keep macOS running well within 8GB, which is actually a nice forcing function against bloat and inefficiency. We could all use a little more of that.

Love this

dlcarrier 4 hours ago||
Eight gigabytes is orders of magnitude more than an OS could ever use, or even the pre-installed software. It's web browsers and the software that uses them that occupy all the RAM, and those are usually made by third parties.

Open a few news web pages, and run Discord, Slack, VS Code, etc, and you'll quickly run out of RAM.

HPsquared 4 hours ago|||
Ironically these are all text-based applications where the actual content on screen is in the order of a few hundred bytes. They've managed to reach a bloat factor of one million.
Affric 3 hours ago||
Tragic
nwienert 3 hours ago||
If you decry bloated web apps and use Chrome on their Mac... there's Safari. It's far more efficient and has a far snappier UI.
dlcarrier 3 hours ago||
There's also Epiphany web browser for cross-platform desktop support and the Fulguris browser for Android.

It is noticeably faster, but Chrome is the new Internet Explorer in more ways than one, and many web pages don't work in WebKit browsers.

Oreb 2 hours ago|||
Posts like this makes me feel like I’m using a different World Wide Web than everybody else. Where are all these pages that don’t work in WebKit browsers?

I use Safari as my main browser, I open Chrome only when I encounter a web site that doesn’t work in Safari. It happens maybe once or twice per year, and half of the time, it turns out that it doesn’t work in Chrome either.

ttoinou 2 hours ago|||
Chrome is the most advanced browsers on each platform. For example I have hundreds of tabs And chrome is the best at saving up RAM in the backgrouns
dlcarrier 2 hours ago||
It's just closing the older tabs and re-rendering them from cache, when returned to. WebKit does the same thing.
ben-schaaf 4 hours ago||||
Apple is no stranger to using a web browser for basic OS functionality. Several pages in the settings app are actually WebKit, source: https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2022/inspecting-web-views-in-ma...
dlcarrier 3 hours ago||
That reminds me of Microsoft's Active Desktop in Windows 98, when the desktop had widgets that were web pages and would show webpage-related errors when something went wrong. We've really gone full circle over the last three decades.
throwaway27448 3 hours ago||
It's not so much "full circle" as we never came up with a better way to render general purpose rich text content than html/css to begin with
dlcarrier 3 hours ago||
It's not really using it for much text, though. It's mostly buttons and controls, which GDI, QuickDraw, and Motif did much better back then and newer toolkits like GTK, Tk, wxWidgets, DWM, Cocoa, etc are great at today.
throwaway27448 3 hours ago|||
Web browsers come preinstalled and come embedded throughout the os.

But, webkit is much better than chrome in memory usage. If only we could force slack and vs code to use the engine better suited for the job.

sho_hn 4 hours ago|||
I occasionally port software I make to MacOS, while mainly being a Linux user, and I settled on a base model, 8 GB M2 Mac Mini for this as well. If it's zippy there, it'll be zippy on the larger models.

On the PC/Linux side I keep an old thermally-constrained i5 Sony Vaio ultrabook with a lowly 4 GB from 2015 around for the same reason.

The main dev box is a Ryzen 9950X3D/128 GB monster, so it's a bit of a difference :)

nicce 3 hours ago||
Meanwhile GitHub tab in Firefox/Chrome eats 6GB RAM alone.
himata4113 3 hours ago|||
because they decided that running elasticsearch on your machine is a great idea!
DANmode 2 hours ago|||
GitHub, GitHub…where else have I seen that name recently?
More comments...