Top
Best
New

Posted by HelloUsername 7 hours ago

DuckDuckGo search saw 28% more visits after Google said people love AI mode(www.pcgamer.com)
585 points | 292 commentspage 6
luckydata 2 hours ago|
that 28% is what, 3 people?
wordpad 5 hours ago||
> 28% more visits

So, from 3 to 4 people?

worik 3 hours ago||
Duckduckgo.com has a AI advisor too. I know not of Google's, I really do not give a soft hoot.

The DDG one is good, useful

josefritzishere 5 hours ago||
Consumers have spoken. They hate AI. Woe unto those tech companies who fail to listen. Your competitors will be happy to take your customers.
partiallypro 5 hours ago||
AI snippets are just terrible, I always just scroll past it. I want to find the website I'm looking for, if I wanted to use AI I'd open up an AI app or website.
jmyeet 5 hours ago||
If you want to use DDG then go for it. Let people enjoy things, I say. But let's not pretend DDG is suddenly surging, or even relevant really. It's a niche service largely for virtue-signaling by people who insist that "Google sucks". That's their core demographic.

Some Googling claims DDG gets 145M searches per day and claims Google gets ~14B. Well, 14B translates to ~162k QPS. I know for a fact that Google's traffic is significantly higher than that so I'm not sure where that claim comes from.

I honeslty don't believe a significant percentage of Google users even know Sundar made a statement about people loving AI mode or would even care, one way or the other. This is just more marketing fluff trying to will DDG growth into existence.

shevy-java 6 hours ago||
I am trying to find a replacement for google search.

DuckDuckGo was also useless. Qwant just copy/pastes Google's awful UI.

We kind of see that all search engines suck now, but in many cases there is no real reason why that should be the case. For instance, why did Qwant copy/paste Google's horrible UI? There is no logical reason for this other than trying to bait in people who like the Google search UI. I don't like that UI Google chose since like 10 years or more; Google ruined its search engine already way before AI.

We really need a search engine that works and isn't control by a greedy, Evil adCompany. DDG isn't the answer; neither is Qwant.

wetpaws 5 hours ago|
[dead]
yieldcrv 6 hours ago||
0.1% to 0.128% is 28% as well
cute_boi 6 hours ago||
The problem with DDG is they don't have their own infra like brave and rely so much on bing...
jraph 5 hours ago|
Yeah, there's no really good option in the search engine space.
noncoml 6 hours ago|
DuckDuckGo have to change their brand name if they want non-technical people to take them seriously
Hugsbox 6 hours ago||
This has been my issue with DuckDuckGo from the start... it needs to be something a little more catchy and that rolls off the tongue. Saying "I'll DuckDuckGo it" feels so clunky. As small of a gripe as it sounds like, it really does matter.
tredre3 3 hours ago|||
But none of Google's alternative sound any better.

I'll bing it.

I'll brave it.

I'll ecosia it.

I'll kagi it.

I'll startpage it.

I'll yandex it.

Okay "I'll brave it" does sound fine, especially in our brave new world, but it's still ambiguous when speaking it.

jraph 5 hours ago||||
No need to turn a brand into a verb for this.

You look it up.

meatmanek 3 hours ago||
I still use google as a verb even though I use Kagi.
yegg 6 hours ago|||
Duck it.
jraph 5 hours ago||
Mind the F being dangerously close to the D on most keyboards here :-)
clownpenis_fart 6 hours ago||
[dead]
More comments...