Top
Best
New

Posted by jjp 6 hours ago

EU fines Temu €200M for allowing sale of illegal products(www.bbc.co.uk)
251 points | 184 comments
dsign 4 hours ago|
Say what you may of Temu, and I do think more vetting of certain goods is a good idea, but they fill a very real need. In the part of Europe where I live, the choice is only between intermediaries for the same products coming from China. The local intermediaries sell a very limited picking at staggering margins. And when it comes to certain things, like electronic components, the choice is between importing (old) American stock with a German company as the intermediary, and that's $$$$ and many weeks of shipping, or using Temu or Aliexpress.

There's something unpleasantly snobbish with the way business is done here, a spirit of "if you have to ask the price, our business is not for you". For example, in Instagram, "Local offerings" pop up all the time in the feed. The ones which are truly local end up in a "call us to know more" button, no pricing info disclosed. The ones that show actual prices tend to be shell companies with no employees, no doubt a thin wrapper around an importer from Asia.

BrtByte 2 hours ago||
But I still think chargers and children's toys are exactly where the line should be drawn
lopis 2 hours ago|||
My line is a little bit further back. Any electronics that will be plugged to a wall... Lots of appliances are not safe.
ben_w 2 hours ago||
Yup. I've even had an (Amazon rather than Temu) power-strip-and-USB combo noticeably sparking and tripping the apartment circuit breakers when plugged in just 6 months after purchase.
aDyslecticCrow 33 minutes ago|||
Could we interest you in some amazons choice fuses? never more be concerned about replacing a fuse! as these ones, simply wont need replacing! (they survive 5-10x their rated current)

https://youtu.be/B90_SNNbcoU

selfhoster1312 1 hour ago||||
I think the line should be much earlier than that. But even with this very thin line, like the parent said, the deficient products are everywhere. Just look at the recalls in any major store here (Carrefour, Action, Leclerc). And that's for the main brands/distributors, go into any bazaar or market and you'll find the exact same products you find on Aliexpress/Temu, but with 10x price markup, like the parent said.

Don't get me wrong. I think companies should be held to higher standards: i just don't understand why only Temu is being held responsible of the entire broken capitalist system.

DANmode 2 hours ago||||
No, let them suck on the poison Happy Meal toy instead.

The line should be drawn by parents.

The paternalism really has gone too far,

and people are (incorrectly and dangerously) expecting to be protected now.

WheatMillington 37 minutes ago|||
A major retailer in my country had to recall thousands of units of kids kinetic sand because it contained asbestos. Are you saying we'd be better off had they not been made to recall these? Or that we'd be worse off had there been more regulation preventing kids from inhaling asbestos in the first place?
ascorbic 11 minutes ago||||
Are parents supposed to perform safety and toxicity testing on all products they buy?
greggsy 1 hour ago||||
With that thinking, people would still be buying unlabelled arsenic wallpaper.

Consumer standards are a net benefit to society.

> and people are (incorrectly and dangerously) expecting to be protected now.

The general public hasn’t the faintest idea how to differentiate between a safe product and an unsafe one, and they shouldn’t have to

AnthonyMouse 24 minutes ago||
> The general public hasn’t the faintest idea how to differentiate between a safe product and an unsafe one, and they shouldn’t have to

The problem being that a marketplace platform with millions of small sellers has no reasonable way to do this either.

Freak_NL 1 hour ago|||
It's all fun and games until your neighbour in a terraced house or apartment building unwittingly starts an uncontrollable battery fire. Electric scooters and those 'hoover boards' from a few years ago are notorious when it comes to that, but plenty of underspecced small electronics will fail spectacularly.
DANmode 1 hour ago||
That’s harder to disagree with,

but, you’re only going to achieve moving the cheapo builders stateside where they’re easier to enforce on.

That race to the bottom isn’t going anywhere - if someone can save a grand half-heartedly wrapping their own packs, they’re going to.

retired 1 hour ago|||
If you ban Temu chargers, people will go to stores to buy the cheapest ones which are identical to the ones on Temu, just for 10x the price.

Edit: Reply to Scroll_Swe as I am rate-limited to posting new comments. The chargers in budget stores are identical to Temu chargers are are frequently recalled.

tobz1000 1 hour ago|||
At least in the UK, the main high-street retailers will only stock goods from reputable brands with a (relatively) decent track record and safety standards. I don't believe there is any intersection between products sold on Temu and e.g. Argos, John Lewis.
RobotToaster 1 hour ago|||
Identical chargers to temu ones are sold on amazon for 5x the price.
justincormack 57 minutes ago||
So Amazon should be prosecuted too.
retired 1 hour ago|||
Not in The Netherlands. Plenty of stores that stock chargers identical to the ones on AliExpress and Temu. Action, Big Bazar, SoLow.

Edit: Reply to lozenge as I am still rate-limited by HN. Some of them get recalled, the vast majority of them are still being sold and could burn your house down.

lozenge 25 minutes ago||
At least they get recalled. I don't think any Temu products are getting recalled.
Scroll_Swe 1 hour ago|||
Nope, Anker or store brand is NOT identical to Temu crap.
Rohansi 48 minutes ago||
Dollar store stock is likely identical to Temu.
munk-a 1 hour ago|||
I know your mileage may vary in different areas of Europe but in Italy and Spain you'll find a plethora of random general stores that resell Aliexpress sorts of goods at a very low markup over direct ordering. The stock variety is obviously more limited but those stores are amazing and fit a really key need.
thesimon 1 hour ago||
These stores are a big thing in Portugal as well, but doesn't really seem to be a thing in Germany. Closest I guess would be Action [1].

[1]: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_Nederland

nekzn 5 minutes ago|||
How about TEDi?
leonhard 1 hour ago|||
What are these stores in Spain/Italy/Portugal?
munk-a 49 minutes ago||
Most of the ones I'm thinking of are just corner stores - it's not a brand or chain to my knowledge. An example might be Bazar Gran Puerto, El Puerto de Sta Maria, CA, ES.
whimsicalism 4 hours ago|||
yes, i'm very in favor of the shift towards direct-to-consumer among chinese retailers, but that might be because i'm not actually all that sympathetic to small business
ryandrake 2 hours ago|||
I recently bought some custom-built pool lighting directly from the manufacturer in Ningbo, and I have to say, the sales, delivery, and customer support I received was top notch. Their representatives were fluent in English and competent, the product quality was excellent (yes, I carefully inspected it upon receipt because it's going into water), and the entire process from measurement to delivery was fast and smooth. And, of course, the price was right.
BrtByte 2 hours ago||
In a way it makes the Temu problem more frustrating
DANmode 2 hours ago||
Because it’s not a Temu problem,

it’s a problem of allowing the collapse of your own civilization?

simplyluke 2 hours ago||||
I'm not all that sympathetic to small businesses that exist functionally as drop shippers for the same products with the same absence of support. Much in the same way I roll my eyes and go to 7/11 over the cute "local" markets that are supplied by the same suppliers nationwide, and you end up in a shiplap-walled coffee shop with $8 bags of chips that could exist anywhere.

Small businesses that do the work of curating a niche item, doing QA work that's absent on the shipments from china, and then offering much stronger aftermarket support/replacement/repair? That is often worth a (substantial) premium over wondering if the item showing up in a month is going to work as intended.

londons_explore 2 hours ago|||
There is totally a market for a global website which instead of shipping goods direct from China by plane instead has local warehouses 1 per city and can deliver to your house within a few hours by motorbike.

Aka like Amazon but with much smaller margins.

The savings would come from the fact sea freight is so much cheaper than air freight.

Someone 2 hours ago|||
And the losses from having warehouses storing zillions of products that do not get sold for a long time.

There’s a reason the likes of Aldi and Lidl have limited product choice.

10000truths 2 hours ago||
Aldi and Lidl deal with perishable goods. Temu (by and large) doesn't.
trollbridge 2 hours ago|||
That’s called “Walmart”
throw-the-towel 1 hour ago||
Not in Europe.
bibstha 1 hour ago||
Europe has plenty of dollar store equivalent.
beezlewax 3 hours ago|||
What part of Europe is that? Is it is in the EU?
runarberg 2 hours ago|||
My reaction to this sentiment is that they fill the same need in Europe as Uber did in the USA. They found a way to operate in a market while avoiding its regulations and are therefor able to offer much lower prices as their competitors who still follow the regulations.

Europe has historically had pretty strict consumer protection laws, and ever since the end of the Cold War these consumer protection laws have been slowly chipped away. When I was a kid for example companies were not allowed to target children in their marketing material. When American media became predominant in the continent, instead of enforcing our own consumer protection laws against American advertisers, regulators just ignored it and allowed it to proliferate, effectively making ads targeting children legal in the continent. Regulators have been showing the exact same inaction towards Chinese retailers breaking our own laws as they did towards American advertisers three decades ago. I foresee that consumer safety laws getting the same fate as the ban on ads targeting children.

ktallett 4 hours ago|||
There is some validity to a marketplace selling items from a larger range of retailers, however the quality is so poor for many items that it simply is no good for society in any way.
everforward 3 hours ago||
> the quality is so poor for many items that it simply is no good for society in any way.

There are some that are genuinely dangerous and bad for society, but there are tons of goods that are "the same thing but half the price because it lasts a quarter the time" that have genuine utility.

Harbor Freight has basically made a drop-shipping business out of it. I often have tools that I need but will probably use 4 times in my life, and the Harbor Freight stuff is crap but will probably work 4 times.

Copy that over a bunch of verticals and it starts to make sense. Clothing for a costume I'll wear maybe twice, niche cooking gadgets for very specific things, tools to do a one-time repair on a car, a flash drive to turn over photos to family members, yada yada.

verall 2 hours ago|||
I think the dirty secret is that a lot of it is not "1/2 the price that lasts 1/4 the time" but "1/4 the price that lasts 9/10 the time" or "1/2 the price for the exact same product without half of the budget going to marketing".

It's not all of it. Some things are seriously worse quality. But really a ton of the "better quality" is just better marketing.

doubled112 3 hours ago||||
> some that are genuinely dangerous ... tools that I need but will probably use 4 times in my life, and the Harbor Freight stuff is crap but will probably work 4 times

Forehead hit hood, but I caught myself so it was a "gentle" reminder instead of a concussion. I should have splurged that time I broke a socket tightening an axle bolt. 150 ft-lbs + 180 degrees is a fair bit of torque.

everforward 2 hours ago||
There are definitely things I wouldn't roll the dice on from Harbor Freight.

Anything that unpredictably dumps large amounts of kinetic energy on failure is one of those.

I had a buddy that bought the tool for getting car suspension springs on from Harbor Freight, and I definitely wouldn't roll those dice.

retired 1 hour ago|||
> Clothing for a costume I'll wear maybe twice

There was a time where society didn't buy clothes to only wear once or twice but would instead rent them for those occasions.

victorbjorklund 3 hours ago|||
Yea, worst is the retail people who clearly hated Temu/Aliexpress etc because they stand no chance at competing with them when they sell the same things but at 10 times the cost (I don’t blame them. Sucks for them) but instead of just saying the truth that they hate the competition they just make up these fake reasons ”oh it’s low quality stuff that will break” when it’s clearly the same stuff from the same factories etc.
jeppester 2 hours ago||
If you played a boardgame, wouldn't you be upset if someone won the game easily, because they decided to just break all the rules?
mytailorisrich 4 hours ago|||
There is a part of conservatism and resistance to change. Online commerce has been seen as "suspicious" by some from the beginning to the point that in, for instance, France free delivery of books is banned... of course this just means that amazon.fr charges 1 cent, instead but it is symptomatic of a state of mind.
Barbing 3 hours ago||
Interesting! They tried using lockers so it could still be free:

https://www.connexionfrance.com/news/amazon-is-wrong-to-use-...

Symbiote 2 hours ago|||
> In the part of Europe where I live

I downvote comments like this, since they make the comment useless. No-one can vouch for or argue against the comment when it's some "part" of a continent of over 40 countries.

Scroll_Swe 1 hour ago|||
Like what?

The clothes are all 100% plastic polyester shit with extra chemicals. If you have proof of otherwise, show me.

Yes I make enough to buy good clothes. If I REALLY need cheap clothes H&M basics are always there.

Same with anything else, IT and tech parts I shop in Sweden.

What else?

Like, what is so needed now that you did not need before but you need to buy plastic China crap from Temu now?

lnxg33k1 3 hours ago||
[flagged]
shell0x 18 minutes ago||
Taobao and Temu are great. The quality is not always amazing, but the prices are low and many sellers even offer customisation.

In Australia, the product selection is often limited, and a lot of local stores are just reselling Chinese-made products with huge markups anyway. At that point, you may as well order directly from China and save money.

It also saves 10% GST.

nickff 3 hours ago||
The EU's approach to imports from PRoC is the regulatory equivalent of trying to 'test your way to quality' (which Deming showed to be nearly impossible). Attempts to use regulatory fines and prosecutions to ensure compliance from PRoC products is a whack-a-mole exercise which will fail.
aDyslecticCrow 22 minutes ago||
Passing the CE certification is annoying, but hardly a significant cost compared to design of the product. Notably, the law forces companies to put their ass on the line if things to wrong, by registering their name to the product they produce.

We also have laws making the store selling the thing that burnt down your house liable for what they sold, which make them think twice about selling a random off-brand fire-starter with unknown manufacturer. This worked great until Temu, Amazon, and Alibaba entered the market claiming to be "marketplaces" connecting "importers to suppliers" while clearly behaving like a store.

The core issue is that, if the producer cannot be sued, the seller cannot be sued, then there is no reason to follow any safety what-so-ever. So fine the distributor until they put some quality control or standards on the producers they give market to, may solve the issue.

The US has this issue as well, though more focus on individuals suing for each case rather than broad-spectrum compliance regulation. The outcome is the same; with nobody to sue, there is no reason to make things safe for human use.

ahartmetz 1 hour ago|||
By the same logic, attempts to use policing to ensure lawfulness are a whack-a-mole exercise which will fail.

So what else are you going to do? Paperwork up front for every single product?

RobotToaster 1 hour ago||
> By the same logic, attempts to use policing to ensure lawfulness are a whack-a-mole exercise which will fail.

That's basically how drugs won the war on drugs, yes.

ahartmetz 15 minutes ago||
But you can't legalize all crime. Drugs are special because they are (sort of) victimless.
miohtama 2 hours ago||
Even if it fails maybe you can get some political scores in the process to get elected again.
esnard 6 hours ago||
Also discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48307237
happyPersonR 4 hours ago||
Does Amazon or eBay get the same fine? Haha it’s the same people on all of these sites …. Just some dropshipping ?
zipy124 2 hours ago||
I've been done by illegal electronics on Amazon too many times. They don't seem to care at all. You can still buy chargers on them that are in an advisory red list on gov UK....
input_sh 3 hours ago||
Amazon is also under investigation under DSA, eBay is not big enough (in the EU) to matter under this law.
acd 4 hours ago||
Big corp penny slap on the fingers. I dont this amount will change behaviour or incentive to make larger profit.
radiator 3 hours ago||
I don't understand how €200M can ever be considered a "penny slap".
notaustinpowers 2 hours ago||
€200M accounts for roughly 1.6% of their €12.3B net profit in 2025.

The average EU salary is €39,808. It's equivalent to a €636 fine. Though this is based on income, not net profit so it's actually more impactful to the average person than to Temu.

dmurray 2 hours ago|||
Most people would find being fined a week's wages significant. It's not what they'd expect to get for, say, murder, but worse than any parking fine and enough that they'd give serious consideration to not doing whatever they did again.
zamadatix 1 hour ago||
Depends how much you made doing the activity you got fined for. Temu says the fine is disproportionate (of course) but I'd be surprised if they made actually less than 200M selling such goods over the years. Ideally it should be several multiples of what was truly made, otherwise it's just a bet you might not get caught or, in the worst case, a loan until you are fined.
gambiting 2 hours ago|||
These sort of calculations are always missing a simple fact that no company on earth, not even Apple or Google shrugs off a 200M fine, no matter how little it is of their entire operating budget. It's the kind of money that gets people fired, even if it made no difference to the bottom line.
pessimizer 20 minutes ago||
> It's the kind of money that gets people fired

1. It's not, and

2. Who cares if somebody gets fired for PR purposes? Especially with a severance that will make sure that their great-grandchildren will never have to work and your great-grandchildren will be paying them rent?

Everybody doing tens of billions of $ of business shrugs off a $200M fine. They might even get a bonus and a plaque for coming up with a scam that lasted so long before it blew up.

gambiting 10 minutes ago||
>>Everybody doing tens of billions of $ of business shrugs off a $200M fine

Again, that's not how it works, although I know people have this romanticized view of big companies casually shrugging off 200M fines like nothing.

>>They might even get a bonus and a plaque for coming up with a scam that lasted so long before it blew up.

Again, cool idea for a book, but doesn't happen in reality. No one gets a pat on the back and a bonus for being fined 200M.

looperhacks 3 hours ago|||
The theory is that this won't be the only fine if Temu doesn't fix this. So yes, a slap on the fingers, but the fines should grow bigger if Temu doesn't address this.
amelius 4 hours ago|||
A real slap on the wrist of the CEO by a wronged customer would leave a more lasting impression.
alephnerd 4 hours ago|||
It sets precedent, and has already led to a (by Chinese foreign policy standards) fairly vicious response [0][1][2].

This is also part of the EU's larger tariffs against China [3].

[0] - https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202605/1361926.shtml

[1] - https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202605/1362200.shtml

[2] - https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202605/1362161.shtml

[3] - https://www.ft.com/content/e28fe696-ac30-4543-a105-febc82789...

B1FF_PSUVM 1 hour ago||
> [0]

Ahah, China going Adam Smith on the EU.

Peacefully, so far. Let's hope they don't go "opium war" on free trade.

throw-the-towel 1 hour ago|||
> while French President Emmanuel Macron even suggested following US-style measures akin to the "Section 301" tariffs.

> A major source of this latest wave of the so-called "China shock" narrative is the claim that the EU's trade deficit with China reached 360 billion euros in 2025.

These are the same people whose collective knickers are getting in a twist over Trump, mind you.

alephnerd 1 hour ago|||
That's already happening with synthetic drugs [0] and the Ukraine War [1].

[0] - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/01/30/china-traf...

[1] - https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/russians-...

throwfaraway135 4 hours ago||
From Claude: The €200 million penalty equals around 0.4% of the global turnover reported last year by Temu's parent company PDD Holdings.

According to Eurostat, the average gross annual salary in the EU is around €39,800 per year for full-time employment. The average net salary comes to roughly €2,461 per month, or about €29,500 net per year.

0.4% of an average worker's gross annual salary = roughly €159.

Barbing 3 hours ago|||
Quick, reinterpret with your own faculties! (Model output got itself banned here) - friendly message :)
gostsamo 4 hours ago|||
The fine is for activity in the EU, so compare it to their business there. Comparing apples to advertisement fliers is useful only if you are using the fliers as toilet paper substitutes.
maxglute 4 hours ago||
How many dead babies or battery fires post Temu, seems like good opportunity to conduct a before/after study on cost:ratio of EU regulations.
Eric_Bulai 2 hours ago||
This news has been circulating on the internet for a long time and it is indeed real, but the question is, if people want to buy something, they will look for alternatives.
BrtByte 2 hours ago||
People will definitely look for alternatives, but that doesn't make regulation pointless
PowerElectronix 2 hours ago||
It helps funding the EU and little else.
Eric_Bulai 2 hours ago|||
Regulation slows down the problem, but demand creates the solution so it doesn't really matter.
dangus 1 hour ago||
This is a nuance-free take.

There’s zero demand for products that are hiding safety issues that nobody was seeking out (e.g., toys with lead paint, batteries that explode)

Demand for illegal things isn’t in a vacuum. It’s hard to enact prohibition on alcohol or cannabis (extremely easy to produce) versus prohibiting something more complicated to make, difficult to smuggle, or less desirable to buy.

If my government bans Crocs am I going to go through the engineering effort to make them myself? Plus, if I go outside the cops will see my illegal Crocs very quickly. I have plenty of alternatives to Crocs and most of them are better. Most likely, I won’t even think about the ban.

We have a good example with incandescent light bulbs. I don’t know anyone who has attempted to violate the ban on home incandescent light bulbs.

The whole “everything should be legal anyway because there will always be a black market” philosophy is not a universal truth and we need to stop assuming that it makes sense.

Detrytus 26 minutes ago||
> We have a good example with incandescent light bulbs. I don’t know anyone who has attempted to violate the ban on home incandescent light bulbs.

Funny, because I remember that when this ban was first introduced in my country there actually was a black market for incandescent light bulbs. Some stores would keep selling them as “special purpose” or “vibration-resistant”. It only ended when LED bulbs appeared on the market, because they are strictly superior product (not like fluorescent ones EU tried to promote earlier)

tgv 2 hours ago|||
Here's your chlorine chicken burger, now with extra chlorine. That'll be $39,95 please.
namibj 1 hour ago||
Plus tax no we can't tell you before you order.
tgv 2 hours ago||
If people want to be healthy and live, they wouldn't smoke, drink, use meth, gamble, etc. What the people might rationally want, is not what drives the market. The infamous invisible hand is just addiction.
grizzo 2 hours ago||
I once bought one of those cheap portable consoles from them (or Aliexpress) and after two month I was given a full refund as the welding of the motherboard contained too much lead. This news really doesn't surprise me that much.
RobotToaster 1 hour ago|
Leaded solder doesn't really pose a health issue to the consumer.
aDyslecticCrow 12 minutes ago||
Neither does; Mercury lamps, Asbestos insulation, Freon refrigerant. It poses issues when disposed off, and is banned for a reason.
schnitzelstoat 5 hours ago|
It seems like quite a light punishment for selling such dangerous products that could literally kill people. The dodgy e-bike batteries have already been linked to several fires.

bigclivedotcom takes apart some of the Temu stuff on YouTube and some of the electronics is atrocious.

1-more 4 hours ago||
They sell adapters to turn oil cans into silencers. Each one should be a violation of the National Firearms Act and subject to up to a half million dollar fine https://www.atf.gov/media/25071/download Nota bened; these are not per-se illegal, but you need to sell them through a firearms dealer and pay for an ATF tax stamp and only in states that have not banned them/all NFA items.
thenthenthen 4 hours ago|||
This. Same for the Chinese mainland app, some wild stuff like that being sold (firearms are highly regulated, but 1:1 copies seem to be ok, maybe because of the high level of regulation?)
gambiting 2 hours ago|||
And hundred-watt lasers sold as "obstacle removers" that can blind people in less than a second from considerable distance.
victorbjorklund 3 hours ago|||
Check will prowse. Western brands aren’t that much better.
aDyslecticCrow 8 minutes ago||
But western brands can be sued or made liable with fines when a house burns down, which force them a minimum level of caution or risk-assessment when designing and selling their product. A random Chinese drop-shipper that vanish into smoke cannot, so all we can do is force the distributor take that responsibility in their place.

So Temu should be sued if a house burns down from a generic-brand e-bike that they imported and took money for.

BrtByte 2 hours ago||
[dead]
More comments...