I use both, many times at the same time, on different projects.

One day one feels better than the other. Then, by the end of the day, the other feels better than the first. I have no idea why.

I still don’t have a favorite.

In the end, I think both are incredibly useful when I take the time to instruct them properly.

The problems come when I let them run wild.

I get the feeling this also means AI works very well for the general coding tasks and that's their biggest success in terms of difficulty AND people paying for it.

Of course every AI company has been over promising and pumping the numbers as much as possible but OpenAI has been hitting the reality wall more because both their people not being able to keep improving at a faster rate and their whole cost structure and financial plates spinning.

This doesn't invalidate the fact Anthropic is also overhyped to the max for their IPO.

I've seen fewer people insisting OpenAI has a moat lately, but I'm still not sold the big winner will be either of these two in the end.

Must be ridiculously easy for Anthropic to fill a round, even at that valuation

How much dilution? Who’s getting the value?

The bubble keeps getting bigger!

Bernie Madoff would be jealous. Stealing all open source and reselling "git clone" + "sed" for $1 trillion is something he did not achieve.

The chutzpah is remarkable.

Most people think the current valuation is for the models themselves. Actually, they're building the infrastructure for the next 50 years.

All overvalued.

my take it's because of the naming: Amodei, Claude and Mythos have this money-throwing vibe to it