Top
Best
New

Posted by apitman 17 hours ago

I admire Fabrice Bellard. He is almost certainly a better overall programmer(twitter.com)
https://xcancel.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/2064095424420487226
820 points | 387 commentspage 4
swiftcoder 15 hours ago|
> A French engineer who lives quietly in Paris has spent 30 years writing software that the entire internet now runs on without knowing his name.

... do tech people really not know who Fabrice Bellard is?

He's kind of a household name in a lot of programming circles

edarchis 15 hours ago||
I'll be honest. I discovered him with this post. And I studied in France. I am also familiar with his projects, the obfuscated C code contest and more. Just don't remember seeing his name.

I guess that if people aren't loud on social media, people tend to ignore them.

Respect to those who posted their praise of someone else on social media. We need more of this.

WillAdams 11 hours ago||
What percentage of the population are computer programmers?

Welcome to that sub-group of the Lucky 10,000 today!

https://xkcd.com/1053/

mihaic 11 hours ago|||
I think I've known about him for 20 years right now, ever since I discovered his code to compute pi to an ungodly amount of digits. The man sure was prolific.
keyle 14 hours ago|||
I've been around for a long time and I know of him. Most people don't bother looking up where stuff comes from.
pantulis 14 hours ago|||
He's a lifelong familiar name since the LZEXE days.
theshrike79 15 hours ago|||
I have an explicit rule not to meet or look up my heroes. Been burned way too many times.

I don't need to know who is building VLC, curl, ffmpeg or any of the other essentials in my life. I just appreciate their work and pitch in some money if possible.

t-3 14 hours ago|||
If you don't put them on a pedestal, you won't ever be crushed when they can't stay on top of it. Appreciating people and the results of people's work doesn't require worship. People don't have to be perfect or even good to make good things. Coming to terms with this and being able to take people as they are instead of how you want them to be is just another part of growing up and leaving behind childish attachments.
theshrike79 2 hours ago||
There is a difference between "not perfect" and "Convicted and went to jail for 11 counts of physical child abuse".

I appreciated the art at the time, but can't really enjoy it anymore knowing what I know. My life would be better if I never found out.

bonzini 15 hours ago||||
You'd be fine with Daniel Stenberg. :)
theshrike79 14 hours ago||
There are multiple people I'm fine with in software circles - Daniel being one of them, but then we have Notch and DHH who used to be cool, but some of their current hot takes are kinda oof.

Specifically way too many authors whose books I've loved have turned out to be not very good human beings. David Eddings and Neil Gaiman are pretty good examples of this.

ryandrake 10 hours ago||
Rowling / Harry Potter comes to mind, too, and Heinlein. You need to be able to separate the artist from the art, the programmer from the program. It’s ok to appreciate a work even if you disagree with its creator’s morals or ethics.
mschuster91 5 hours ago||
> It’s ok to appreciate a work even if you disagree with its creator’s morals or ethics.

In the case of Harry Potter... the perception of the work tends to follow the perception of the author. There's a bunch of issues with the original books that's widely seen as problematic today - character names seen as racist [1], enough problematic gender stereotypes to warrant half a dozen of academic papers of various quality, and last but not least antisemitism that continues even into modern works such as the shofar in Hogwarts Legacy [2].

I won't deny it, I enjoyed both the books and the movies, but it's ... not something I'd just hand over to my kids one day without having a serious talk with them beforehand. Back when I was young nobody cared too much (although I do member that at least in Germany, the goblins-jews analogy was discussed a bit), but nowadays...

[1] https://7news.com.au/entertainment/harry-potter-fans-call-ou...

[2] https://theconversation.com/how-hogwarts-legacy-video-game-r...

bigstrat2003 2 minutes ago||
I'm not gonna lie: it has always struck me as extremely racist to claim that goblins are caricatures of Jews. No normal, reasonable person reads Harry Potter and thinks "Jew" instead of "wacky fantasy creatures".
swiftcoder 12 hours ago|||
> I have an explicit rule not to meet or look up my heroes. Been burned way too many times.

I mean, don't put them on a pedestal, but meeting them can still be fun. Carmack may have developed some really unfortunate rich-guy political views, but it was nice to get to go to Dallas to meet him.

theshrike79 2 hours ago||
"Meet" is metaphorical here =)

I'd _love_ to meet Notch or DHH live and have a chat, both would have some pretty good stories. Hell I'd even have a beer or two with Neil Gaiman.

It's mean to convey "don't look up the personal details of artists, just enjoy the art as-is". Similarly I don't interact with the fandoms of any of the media I follow. There are a few good ones, but the majority are insufferable (to me).

_zoltan_ 15 hours ago|||
no, most people wouldn't know. you're in an echo chamber if you think he is well known.
dgellow 14 hours ago||
Can we stop calling every niche an echo chamber?
AussieWog93 14 hours ago||
It is an echo chamber if you think your niche is universal though.
ninkendo 12 hours ago||
“And quartz, of course”

https://xkcd.com/2501/

konart 15 hours ago|||
First time hearing the name too.

>programming circles

Well, not all tech people are part of some curcles I guess.

ErroneousBosh 14 hours ago|||
And you can just email him. He's just this guy, that writes stuff, and likes to help answer questions about it.
pdpi 15 hours ago|||
"Tech people" aren't one single homogeneous mass. His name is unlikely to show up in the same conversation as, say, DHH.
defrost 15 hours ago|||
That's understood in the comment which explicitly indicates that there are many programming circles and that Bellard is known in a number of them (but not all).

eg: I grew up in the Australian Kimberley region (kind of remote), spent decades in geophysical mapping, multi channel data processing, computational algebra, and other odd niches, have no real interest in SV, and am quite familiar with Bellard's work.

No idea who DHH is though.

a96 15 hours ago||
https://tekin.co.uk/2025/09/the-ruby-community-has-a-dhh-pro...

https://community.frame.work/t/framework-supporting-far-righ...

account42 14 hours ago||
That validates his point - barely anyone outside the ruby community would even know about DHH if he didn't manage to trigger the eternally outraged.
a96 12 hours ago||
Oh, yes. That was a straight-face answer to "who DHH is", not anything to contradict or argue anyone's point. I never heard of the initialism in any other context either.
jdsnape 15 hours ago||||
I knew of Fabrice, and have admired him for many years…but who is DHH?
Bigpet 15 hours ago|||
If you did "web stuff" in the early 2000s (like 2005-2010). You'd probably know who he is. He did Ruby on Rails, a backend web framework.

But that was also very Start-up and America focussed. So if you did web dev in some other country and didn't have colleagues who were into that culture you still might've missed the name.

hdgvhicv 14 hours ago|||
Ru y was something that one guy tinkered with briefly. It was less used than Perl. Java and php was what tools were built in at my company.
konart 15 hours ago||||
TBH the biggest difference is him being more vocal.

I'm pretty sure most of the people who did "web stuff" at the time and used twitter (key point maybe) know him simply because you'd often see his tweets. Regardless of coutry (I'm from Russia, for exampl)

ErroneousBosh 14 hours ago|||
There was a big RoR scene in Glasgow in the mid-2000s, but there were a few of us that were resolutely Django.

I stand by that decision, for various reasons.

Not least being that "Why's Poignant Guide to Ruby" gave me the ick.

konart 15 hours ago||||
Ruby on Rails creator (among other things).
swiftcoder 12 hours ago||||
To be fair, I don't think anyone outside the Ruby community knew who DHH was until his politics went viral on twitter
lproven 11 hours ago||||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Heinemeier_Hansson
noufalibrahim 14 hours ago||||
DHH markets himself much better. His company (basecamp), in a sense, revolves around his public persona and he's unapologetic about this. It's the same with all of his projects (e.g. Omarchy recently).
otabdeveloper4 15 hours ago|||
Yeah, same.
_zoltan_ 15 hours ago||||
DHH is even less known, don't kid yourself.
pdpi 4 hours ago|||
I'm not saying DHH is more widely known than Fabrice Bellard. I'm saying that it really depends on your audience. I can think of many colleagues over the years who would know who David is, but not Fabrice.

(Also, I specifically chose DHH as somebody who's highly unlikely to show up in the same discussion as Fabrice Bellard, not because I'm a fan of his. Judging from the replies, I succeeded beyond my wildest expectations!)

ErroneousBosh 14 hours ago|||
Oh DHH is well known. We all know about DHH.
DonHopkins 13 hours ago||
Just that he's a douchebag, not what the letters stand for.
ErroneousBosh 8 hours ago||
I hope your middle name doesn't start with H ;-)

We know it's not you.

hdgvhicv 14 hours ago|||
What is a DHH? A person?
lproven 11 hours ago||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Heinemeier_Hansson
RicoElectrico 11 hours ago||
The HN bubble surfaces mainly those programmers who are either

- active in the startup/VC scene

- "indie hackers"

- chasing platonic elegance with functional languages (for which the world at large doesn't care)

- rewriting everything in Rust

Fabrice doesn't seems to firmly fit any of this.

bananaflag 14 hours ago||
When I saw the title I first thought of Fabien Sanglard.
Shish2k 8 hours ago|
... I'm only now realising thanks to this comment that they are two different people >.>
trollbridge 8 hours ago||
bellard.org is one of those domains along with righto.com that brings me joy and excitement when I see it pop up on HN. Means it’s gonna be a good day.
kens 7 hours ago|
Thanks!
asxndu 16 hours ago||
Does Fabrice Ballard have any interviews?
cubefox 2 hours ago|
Congrats, you are now unbanned: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48538329
rramadass 5 hours ago||
Best way to describe how an "ordinary" Programmer feels towards Fabrice Bellard ;-)

"I trust that I am not more dense than my neighbours [i.e. fellow programmers], but I was [and am] always oppressed with a sense of my own stupidity in my dealings with [the works of Fabrice Bellard]."

-- inspired by Watson's comment about Sherlock Holmes in "The Red-Headed League" from the volume, The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes.

jdw64 14 hours ago||
How on earth were those people able to create such amazing things? Will I ever be able to create something that brilliant someday? What should I even make? I have so many more tools than they did, even LLMs. Where can I learn the ideas and skills they had?
ldargin 6 hours ago||
Don't use LLMs except for the most menial things. Get as much practice in creating various things. Study expert-level books on related subjects. Foster your creativity in other areas too (i.e. writing, drawing, music). Don't pass up the chance to work with veteran developers; be ready for that opportunity when it comes.
alecco 14 hours ago|||
The smart path: Find good mentors (and return the favor); use LLMs not to do the work but to help you learn and exercise your brain: make them test you, using something aking to teacher/Socratic method, make mistakes and get the mentor/LLM to review in a way you figure out the answer.
smallstepforman 14 hours ago|||
Find an itch, then scratch it. If many people have the same itch and can use your solution, you win.

Simple as that.

vidarh 10 hours ago||
The converse: Most itches will either be idiosyncratic, and not get you much attention, or lots of people will be scratching them and it's hard to come out "on top".

I scratch lots of itches, but I also know that most of them are very, very fringe. So going into scratching itches expecting fame is not going to go well for most. But scratching itches is satisfying, so for my part at least I don't care.

ivanjermakov 14 hours ago|||
Find a problem and work on a solution for 20+ years.
EugeneOZ 14 hours ago||
Start fixing the unfixable and doing the undoable things ;)
AndrewKemendo 6 hours ago||
RIP this class of programmer.

Ritchie, Knuth, Notch, Carmack, Dean etc… these are like the Mount Rushmore of writing code and I think that era is over.

wiseowise 14 hours ago||
Carmack replies to slop generated by slop account. What a time to be alive.
csomar 14 hours ago|
Yeah, I can't finish reading tweet. Is that even made for human consumption?
aembleton 13 hours ago||
Yes, whats wrong with it?
wiseowise 12 hours ago|||
Nothing wrong, unless you have intact brain.
Keyframe 10 hours ago|
Maybe a hot take, but I wouldn't call Carmack a great programmer as in _one of the greats_, but definitely influental and original.
deltarholamda 9 hours ago|
I'm not even sure how you'd define a great programmer. Like Justice Potter Stewart I sort of "know it when I see it". For example, I don't think anybody is going to put Rasmus Lerdorf on the Mount Rushmore of Great Programmers, but man alive is PHP really important and quite good, even at the time of release.
More comments...