Top
Best
New

Posted by supercopter 12 hours ago

Israel targeted Gaza children resulting in genocide, UN inquiry says(www.reuters.com)
342 points | 126 commentspage 2
utirrjrk 12 hours ago|
We need to build beach resorts, with casinos and golden statues!
3997531578 11 hours ago||
[dead]
eboy 3 hours ago||
Disgusting. Fuck Israel the new nazis
henry2023 23 minutes ago|
Even literal nazis were stopped at some point.
Lionga 11 hours ago||
[dead]
petesergeant 11 hours ago||
[flagged]
Zealotux 10 hours ago||
Is the killing of five-year-old Hind Rajab, alongside six of her family members, and two paramedics who came to rescue her, also a reach? Please, help me draw the line.
gershy 8 minutes ago||
I need to push down emotions to put it this way, but I think it's also important to consider that tragedies and losses of human such as hind rajab are possible even in a justified war.
ignoramous 11 hours ago|||
> is a reach

  Israel's targeting of neonatal and maternity care centres during its war on Gaza directly endangered Palestinians' reproductive future and the survival of newborns – driving a rise in miscarriages, birth defects, and lasting vulnerabilities.

  Israel's aid blockade in Gaza last year also took a severe toll on Palestinian children, causing starvation-related deaths and a rise in disease as immunisation rates fell.

  Palestinian children have been arrested and subjected to torture in Israeli prisons and other severe forms of mistreatment, including sexual abuse.

  Israeli forces have destroyed orphanages and education facilities in the occupied West Bank, which has affected Palestinian children's cognitive, social and emotional care and development.
hsuduebc2 11 hours ago||
I mean, if you are sure there are children and there is a quite a lot of children there, it's deliberate.

It's actually one of the places in the Middle East with a higher birth rate than Israel itself, and a very high population density.

If you are shooting into the crowd which includes children, you are shooting at children even when you are not pointing at them precisely.

josefritzishere 8 hours ago||
Flagging a serious topic like this indicates motive in a way that's unbecoming.
the_origami_fox 12 hours ago||
This is rising fast. 61 points at this moment.
the_origami_fox 11 hours ago||
Doubled to 103 points in 6 minutes
mapotofu 11 hours ago|||
And flagged 36 minutes after submission right around 104
the_origami_fox 11 hours ago|||
Flagged and off the home page. Now at 106 points.
the_origami_fox 10 hours ago||
After another half hour it is at 134 points despite being flagged.
the_origami_fox 5 hours ago||
It's taken another 5 hours to reach 201 points, despite being flagged and removed from the home page at around 100 points.

It is no longer flagged.

mentalgear 11 hours ago|||
[retracted]
the_origami_fox 11 hours ago||
[flagged]
isgb 11 hours ago||
Or it could be that the Reuters article just came out a few hours ago
the_origami_fox 11 hours ago||
[flagged]
tkfoss 11 hours ago||
mods are still sleeping
akikoo 57 minutes ago||
Were hurty words written here?
MASNeo 11 hours ago||
[flagged]
Cynddl 11 hours ago||
If you look at the bottom of the page, you’ll find guidelines that mention which content is welcomed: “Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.”

That said, I find this particularly of interest here given the growing attention to the use of algorithms and AI (including generative AI) for surveillance and targeting of palestinians.

n4r9 11 hours ago|||
> On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Personally, I find the political machinations around this conflict particularly interesting.

utirrjrk 11 hours ago||
[flagged]
Protostome 11 hours ago||
[flagged]
n4r9 11 hours ago||
> In October 2025, the ICJ issued an advisory opinion [wikidata] finding that Israel's claims that UNRWA had been infiltrated by Hamas were unsubstantiated. The advisory opinion also said that Israel's decision to end cooperation with UNRWA and restrict humanitarian aid to Gaza breached its obligations under the Geneva Conventions and the UN Charter. It furthermore found that Israel's Gaza Humanitarian Foundation was not an adequate substitute, noting that more than 2,100 Palestinians had been killed near its distribution points and that conditions in Gaza had deteriorated to the point that international experts declared a famine in some areas in August. The ICJ further held that the mass transfer or deportation of civilians within occupied territory is prohibited, citing Israeli measures that forced large populations into overcrowded areas and severely restricted UN access. It also ruled that the two Knesset laws ending cooperation with UNRWA in the occupied territories were unlawful, noting that 360 UNRWA staff had been killed during the conflict. The court concluded that Israel, as an occupying power, had unlawfully impeded aid delivery, used starvation as a method of warfare, and failed to respect the immunities of UN personnel and premises.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNRWA_and_Israel#International...

Protostome 11 hours ago||
the UN claimed that the UN agency was just fine... no s**.
n4r9 11 hours ago||
The ICJ is legally and structurally independent of the UN. What specifically do you disagree with about the advisory opinion?
Protostome 10 hours ago||
"The International Court of Justice (ICJ; French: Cour internationale de justice, CIJ), or colloquially the World Court, is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN)"

"The Court is composed of a panel of 15 judges elected by the UN General Assembly and Security Council for nine-year terms"

Literally, from the first few paragraphs of wikipedia. People don't read these days.

If the UN general assembly (mostly anti israel) selects the judges how is it "structurally independent of the UN"?

throwaway9917 5 hours ago||
I've often heard defenders of Israel crap on the UN General Assembly like it's some woke antifa type organization, but it's one representative per country, chosen by the country's government. If almost every country in the world is constantly officially condemning you, perhaps they are not the problem.
Protostome 4 hours ago|||
Well, given that between 2015 and 2024 alone, the General Assembly adopted 154 resolutions against Israel. That's more than Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Russia, China *combined*, I find it a bit ... unfair, wouldn't you say?
Schmerika 1 hour ago||
More than 14,500 children were killed by Israel in that period.

14,500 / 154 = more than 94 children per resolution. Seems fair.

How many children did "Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Russia, China combined" kill in this period, I hear you whatabout: Highest reasonable estimates are ~5,000–10,000 children.

... So, no. I don't think it's unfair.

Now let's compare how many sanctions have been inflicted on each country above. If you measure by number of sanctioned individuals/entities, a rough ranking would be:

1: Russia. 2: Iran. 3: North Korea. 4: Sudan. 5: China. 6: Israel.

... So if you're trying to hint that the whole world is only against genocide because they're antisemitic, the facts you're referring to don't really seem to back you up. At all.

throw358643 4 hours ago|||
It’s disingenuous to pretend that the Middle East conflict does not align people according to tribal, religious, and political groupings, as well as international alliances.

Given that Jews are 0.2% of the world’s population, in contrast to a very large population of people openly biased against Israel, it’s no surprise that when you take a global popular vote that Jews will lose. The UN is not a neutral institution.

throwaway9917 4 hours ago||
Sure I understand how Arab or Muslim countries might vote against Israel reflexively, but it's not just them, it's almost the entire world.

Go look at this list of Israel related General Assembly resolutions in 2025:

https://unwatch.org/2025-unga-resolutions-on-israel-vs-rest-...

The typical vote is like 142-6. The Israeli claim is that almost the entire world are a bunch of anti-Semites that hate them for who they are. Perhaps it's not who they are but what they are doing.

Protostome 4 hours ago|||
There are roughly 50 to 57 countries where Muslims make up the majority of the population. Add the countries that are heavily dependent on them, and you end up with a game that is often decided before a single ballot is cast.
throw358643 4 hours ago|||
From your link: “From 2015 through 2024, the UN General Assembly has adopted 173 resolutions against Israel and 80 against other countries.”

Do you seriously think that throughout this time Israel has been that much worse than all other countries?

There are many other indications that the UN is biased about Israel:

Only one country has its own permanent agenda Item 7 in the UN.

Palestinian refugees have their own organization vs refugees from all over the world, with almost 10x the budget per person.

In the UNESCO description of Jerusalem it says “The Wailing Wall delimits the quarters of the different religious communities”.

There are many other examples like this.

Not a single country in the world opened its doors to Jewish refugees during the Holocaust. So the majority of the world can absolutely be wrong.

pvaldes 1 hour ago||
> Not a single country in the world opened its doors to Jewish refugees during the Holocaust.

Not one except USA.

And Sweden, Dominican Republic, Denmark, France, Luxembourg, Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Poland, Bolivia, Spain, the Soviets and all the other countries that allowed safe crossing. Even Italy hid Jews... so what history books do you studied?.

mapotofu 11 hours ago||
It’s still pretty surprising that a country so armed to the teeth with ground troops and missile defense systems would have let Oct 7 happen for as long as it did, and with so many people dying. I agree that it was wrong of Israel to do that.
KevinMS 9 hours ago|
[flagged]
n4r9 9 hours ago||
I condemn the terrorist that stands behind a hostage; I condemn the sniper that takes the shot anyway.
KevinMS 1 hour ago||
what if the terrorist is repeatedly launching rockets?
mfru 9 hours ago||
The human shields narrative has long been debunked.
KevinMS 1 hour ago||
you are too far gone to even argue with
More comments...