Do I, as a paying user, own the output the LLM has produced or am I merely licensing the output?

Most paying users assume ownership, in which case I’ll do with that output what I want.

If the LLM outputs are not owned by the user, but are actually licensed, please clarify the terms of commercial use.

So it is as "dangerous" as Fable?

Cry about it IMO. Anthropic reaps what they sow.

Information wants to be free.

"Well, Steve, I think there's more than one way of looking at it. I think it's more like we both had this rich neighbor named Xerox and I broke into his house to steal the TV set and found out that you had already stolen it."

Anthropic should think hard about all their fear mongering. It will only end up backfiring on them and everyone else involved.

They definitely used closed private saas products to train their own models, to prove that just drop random small screenshots of any popular product behind a login screen and see how well it's able to identify all of them. ex: https://x.com/michalwols/status/2079968211865330165

or other similar "AI" startups https://x.com/envconfig/status/2079613455296827402

Weird 'discussion'. Almost entirely single messages with no threads, all with the same anti-Anthropic/AI position.

IP protections for me, not for thee.

I think the major take away is, Chinese labs are very good at stealing others AI work and offering it did a fraction of the cost. This will be the reason the AI stock market bubble bursts. Unless they add in protection similar to patents, which stops these copied models being used by business.