Top
Best
New

Posted by ExMachina73 2 days ago

The title cards in Blade Runner are amazing(randsinrepose.com)
435 points | 210 commentspage 3
jvanderbot 2 days ago|
Berkeley Mono is an excellent font. Highly recommended if you still code.

https://usgraphics.com/products/berkeley-mono

And by the way, this website is fantastic.

sigttou 2 days ago||
https://github.com/ahatem/IoskeleyMono - Is a free, open-source alternative.
jvanderbot 1 day ago||
I paid for berkeley mono and don't mind. But I'm not saying anything negative about free alts
sgt 2 days ago||
What do you mean, if you still code? I assume everyone on HN still at the very least review actual code in an IDE or editor.
jdw64 2 days ago||
These days, I see a lot of people using AI for everything except hobby projects. Recently, I joined a maintenance project where the team leader even instructed us to use AI exclusively. So I just keep one hobby project that I write by hand, but the market these days mostly uses AI coding.
sgt 2 days ago||
Completely trusting it to the AI is negligent, I don't think any serious projects do it this way. A lot of AI usage yes, but reviews and tweaks still require someone reading and understanding code, structures and design patterns.
jvanderbot 1 day ago|||
Well there's a difference between "Generate all code with AI" and "Trust AI exclusively"

And yes, in talking to friends in other areas of s/w, it's really eating the workflow.

It does degrade muscle memory, too. I sat down and tried to write some code yesterday and found I fumbled the basic syntax over and over.

Personal feelings aside, I do think there's a degredation of ability that will cause AI lock-in. Eventually we wont be able to whip up analysis or prototypes without AI.

It's not like mechanical engineers can do a big part of their day job without things like SolidWorks, but still, it feels like an Uber moment where they're burning hard to displace traditional methods before they price gouge.

I'd love a better IDE, where I'm _writing_ rather than _watching_ and it truly does fill in gaps / help vs handing over the reins entirely.

jdw64 2 days ago|||
I think so too, but the problem is that this was a 'serious' project. Some tech leaders genuinely believe that AI writes better code than humans, and the sad part is that they're somewhat right.

So these days, I'm not sure anymore. I just do coding as a hobby now. I once asked out of curiosity, and I still remember the answer:

'Why do I trust AI more than you? Because you code based on your own thinking, and that doesn't always match mine. But if I run AI against the spec I wrote, at least when I take responsibility, I won't feel like I got screwed over.'

The project had no issues. Of course it didn't—most CRUD work already has well-established solutions

teo_zero 2 days ago||
No, I don't find anything amazing in Blade Runner's title sequence, and the article does nothing to convince me.

Yes, they got small-caps spacing right: hardly amazing. And what about the "feeling" the article talks about? Where is it and where does it come from?

roughly 2 days ago||
Creating the title cards is a process that involves a thousand different decisions, all of which feed into each other. Design of this isn’t any different than design of software or design of anything else. The “feeling” comes from all of those decisions harmonizing together into a coherent whole, same way a well-crafted codebase feels correct.
teo_zero 2 days ago||
Yes, no doubts. But why does the author think that in this case such process was followed, and was so successful to deserve the "amazing" adjective? How did this specific design manage to convey the intended feeling? Was it better than the proto version that was never released?

It's like someone recommending a restaurant saying "tastes good", with no details to back up such assertion.

roughly 2 days ago||
The evidence is the output - sure, they could’ve been throwing dice for every decision and landed at this spot out of pure luck, but that’s not a hypothesis that’s likely to hold up under scrutiny.
bux93 1 day ago||
Here's a visual listicle of "the 10 best opening title sequences of all time". (Epilepsy warning: a lot of flashing in #10) - they compare and contrast and highlight how their picks stand out against others.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8twthdaqB8

Not only is this a better example of film (title) criticism, the titles they pick are also more amazing.

roughly 1 day ago||
“This is a better example of film criticism” is a defensible statement, “more amazing” is an aesthetic opinion.
draw_down 2 days ago|||
[dead]
mpfh 2 days ago|||
I think Rands had too much coffee.
Applejinx 2 days ago||
It's probably an AI-written article. I was curious enough about the premise, but there wasn't any intention in there, it sort of wanders about going 'ooh'.
dylan604 2 days ago||
I also appreciate this was before the trend of animating the opening credits by increasing the kerning. I'm sure graphic designers today would consider it boring and low effort/energy. It's giving lame. Or some such criticism.
brownieman1325 1 day ago|
same thing happened on the web, letter-spacing/tracking reveal on scroll is basically the default hero animation now. felt premium a few years back, now it just kinda signals template
timfsu 2 days ago||
This makes me think - should we be using non-monospace fonts for coding agent chat to improve readability? Wonder if we can get Claude and Codex to do that automatically in supported terminals
KayEss 2 days ago||
I've been using proportional fonts for programming for more than thirty years. Makes things much easier to read and it's only a problem where people try to make patterns out of the code
DrewADesign 2 days ago||
Nope. It might improve readability for individual words, but for blocks of code with similar features at irregular lengths, uniform kerning provides structure and a bunch of clean edges that help you visually orient yourself. Just like title text and body text generally need different kerning, so do body text and code.

(As a full time developer for over a decade that got a design degree, I have experimented with it a lot!)

Cpoll 2 days ago||
> For the exposition crawl, they use standard capitalization except for two variants

Three variants; "Robot" is capitalized though it is not a proper noun.

Computer0 2 days ago||
I found this site [https://fontsinuse.com/] mentioned in the article to be quite interesting to browse through.
mikeaskew4 1 day ago||
Always been fascinated by the craft of film titles. Powerpoints could be so more engaging with less words and more music.
eszed 2 days ago||
What's this unavoidable YouTube video that activates on-scroll? I that doesn't become a design pattern, because it's horrible.
jdw64 2 days ago||
>I’ve created a full-time job for myself talking to Claude Code. Maybe this person and I could become friends.
isoprophlex 2 days ago|
Title as submitted to HN is missing a word.
iammjm 2 days ago|
Interesting. While the missing word doesn’t contribute any new information, it does convey a feeling. Like a typeface.
More comments...