Top
Best
New

Posted by Raed667 10 hours ago

Two wheels, a few tradeoffs, and gas prices(blog.raed.dev)
22 points | 36 comments
buildsjets 8 hours ago|
I get it, I have over 60,000 miles commuting on two wheels (Most of them on my 2003 Kawasaki ZR-7s that I have owned since new and just rode to work on Thursday), in all kinds of inclement weather, primarily to avoid parking hassles and traffic. But I'm also lucky to be alive, because one day, I was waiting at a red light, and the guy who was stopped about 2 car lengths behind me was so drunk he hallucinated that the light turned green, punched the gas, rear ended me, and drove me and my bike into the 3 cars ahead of us. I was remarkably uninjured, but could easily have lost my legs or worse. There was nothing I could have done or forseen to avoid the collision.

My wife had a separate motorcycle accident on her Ninja 500r that she caused by turning left against oncoming traffic and getting T-boned. The car bumper hit her directly on the right foot, breaking most all the bones in her ankle, then flipping her over the hood and breaking her femur. She had to have bunch of bones in her foot fused, walks with a pronounced limp, and can't go to any event where she has to stand for more than 30 minutes at at time. We used to go to all kinds of rock concerts, now she has to skip the pit and is stuck in balcony seating.

Motorcycles can be convenient and a whole lot of fun, but do not underestimate the statistical likelihood of a life-changing accident, especially if you are in a position where you have dependents that you have financially and emotionally committed to. I have cats, they won't care if I eat it, so long as THEY get fed by someone.

c048 7 hours ago||
In the parts of Europe where I've lived, Western/Northern EU, the ERs nickname motorcycle as "donor-wagons".
RhysU 7 hours ago||
"Donorcycles" in the US.

Carry term life insurance and long term disability so you can support your dependents if killed or injured, which you should be doing regardless of the motorcycle if you have dependents.

A former neighbor died from slipping on his icy front steps. Again, carry proper insurance if you have dependents. You can die unexpectedly from things far less dangerous than motorcycles.

gumby 7 hours ago|||
My sister and I used to wait after school at the ER for my mother to finish her shift. Back then we could wander in to the ER if we were bored (basically no privacy for the patients).

Because of what we would see, neither of us has ever ridden a motorcycle on the street.

e40 7 hours ago|||
Rode one for 5 years in my 20s and sold it after 2 close calls. Kawasaki Ninja 550 and then 750. The 750 had a scary amount of power.

I consider myself lucky that I didn’t have a serious accident.

TacticalCoder 6 hours ago||
> I was remarkably uninjured, but could easily have lost my legs or worse.

Same. Used to do MX (Yamaha 250 2 strokes) when I was below 30 y/o, as well as off-road/dirt biking, but it's on the road that I got one terribly bad accident (flew over a car than ran a red light while I ran an orange one), with an XR 350, where I ended up unconscious and woke up without being able to see anything (freaking scary and I did last about an hour maybe? Don't remember but I woke up in the ambulance and only started seeing while at the hospital).

I also another crash as a passenger on a... Vespa. Insanely dumb crash.

Both times I escaped mostly unarmed (broke a thumb requiring surgery to put some kind of a nail in it and then remove it).

My brother got a terrible tank slapper at the absolute worst moment: usually you can accelerate to lift the front wheel to get rid of it but there were cars in front of him... He literally flew over his own bike (a Triumph Street Triple) without hitting anything: just due to the tank slapper. He thankfully stopped gliding before hitting the cars in front of him (and nearly got hit by his own bike).

I love bikes but I don't do any anymore and they do freaking scare me. As a father now they're actually my nightmare.

My brother bought a new Triumph (once more a Street Triple) and he's got a CBR 600RR for the track but I just quit motorbikes altogether.

> I have cats, they won't care if I eat it, so long as THEY get fed by someone.

Your wife and friends will care. Don't eat it. Glad your wife is OK: could have been worse.

ahf8Aithaex7Nai 1 hour ago||
Riding a motorcycle is one of the things in life that puts me in a good mood. I live in Germany. Traffic here seems to be pretty orderly. I don’t feel like the cars around me are putting me in danger. I have protective gear for cross-country rides and tours, but most of the time I ride without it, especially in town. It’s important not to equate the joy of riding with speed and recklessness. You should ride with foresight and defensively, without rushing unnecessarily and with great consideration for other road users. Then everything should be fine. I hope I haven’t jinxed it now and won’t get hit by a car tomorrow or something. Of course, something like that can always happen.

Right now, I only have a big street bike with over 70 hp. But I remember from back in the day how much fun small engines are, so I’m thinking about getting something with 125cc or even 50cc again for riding around town. A Honda CB125F, Super Cub, Skyteam Skymax 125, or Mash Fifty. 125cc is more than enough! 50cc is really quite small, but it still gets you from A to B with plenty of fun, and you avoid the mandatory vehicle inspection that’s otherwise required here for all vehicles every two years.

stanski 8 hours ago||
I'm not so sure that motorcycle emissions are much better than a car's, even if they do consume less gas. Cars have very complicated emissions systems and are under stricter regulations.

I've also never been able to get anywhere close to 3l/100km. As soon as you move onto bigger displacement bikes, you're looking at around 6l/100km, which is comparable to a hybrid car that weights 5-6 times what the bike does! It's far from an extremely efficient mode of transportation given the significantly reduced utility.

Regardless, ride as long as you enjoy it, or until you have to recalculate the amount of risk you can afford!

ok_dad 6 hours ago|
Yea I don’t want to be that guy but my EV that seats 4 uses less fuel to get the same distance when you account for the massive inefficiency of a petrol engine versus that same petrol in a power plant with heat recovery and fancy emissions controls.

It’s fun to ride motorcycles though.

mcmoor 3 hours ago||
About the risk part, I'm still not really sure how third world countries traffic change the equation. There are a lot of them so cars have to already account for them by default. The sheer quantity also makes traffic slower, and when accidents do happen, when it's between motorcycles there's not that much energy involved compared to cars accident. Also people here rarely have motorcycle with >150cc so accident impact is reduced even further.

But we also have much worse roads and people drive much more recklessly. But maybe this is risk compensation in action. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_compensation

gravypod 7 hours ago||
We will not reverse climate change by consuming less. The solutions are equally political and technological. Driving a smaller vehicle does help but real solutions would be: building homes next to jobs, public transportation, electrification, and carbon capture.

> On a motorcycle, you’re in the environment instead of sealed off from it. Lavender above Grasse in June, a 5-degree temperature drop when the road cuts through a forest, leaning into corners with your whole body

Very romantic, but not very realistic. Most commuters need to show up for work in heat, rain, snow, etc.

majormajor 7 hours ago||
Electrification and carbon capture are interesting and need more investment, but beyond those you're also showing your own preferences here just as much as the motorcycle proponents.

>building homes next to jobs

This is almost certainly still "consuming less" in the US. You just cannot pack as much combined square footage + individual private outside space as most Americans are accustomed to next to all the jobs. (Without even getting into that people often change jobs, or have multiple household members working different jobs in different places.)

(This is where usually people say "well the non-generational-housing single-family-home is a dumb choice, or bad for mental health or society or whatever" but that would just take us back to debating about what sort of "consume less" is a "real" sacrifice or not.)

> public transportation

Here too I think that a 20-40 minute packed-standing bus or train car (as is the rush-hour case in cities where large numbers of people commute by public transit) is again "consuming less" than a vehicle that's essentially a private luxury pod (whether driving yourself, the car driving for you, or someone else driving you.)

aldonius 6 hours ago||
You've touched on a key point: in a city, space is at a premium, so taking up a lot of it for yourself _really is_ luxury consumption.
drnick1 7 hours ago||
> building homes next to jobs

That already exists, it's called a city. But cities are inevitably dirty, noisy and dangerous because they concentrate people by design, and many people, especially families, don't want to live in one.

Public transit has the same problems. Put many people in a small space and again you get something awful.

CobaltFire 7 hours ago||
Rode for nearly 100k miles before giving it up (had a 100 mile/day commute, plus leisure).

Too many close calls, and since giving it up lost five coworkers to accidents.

Still miss it all the time, but it's just not worth the risks. I don't even bicycle on public roads (in the US; I do in Japan) any longer due to too many close calls and several injuries in my social group.

mulanroo 2 hours ago||
Motorcycles are everywhere in the Philippines, and there are far more now because of delivery riders. They make sense here: they get through traffic and park anywhere. The tradeoff is the roads, which can be rough, and riders squeezing through whatever gap they can find. Accidents are common. I don't ride myself, but it's obvious why so many people do.
comrade1234 7 hours ago||
I got my motorcycle license so that I could split lanes when I lived in California. It's legal in the sense that there's no mention of it in the books. So you can split lanes as long as you're not being reckless. Some car drivers had a problem with it and when they saw you coming up behind them they'd move into your space to block you. Bizarre.
hackingonempty 42 minutes ago||
Added to the books in 2016, the law directs the CHP to develop "educational guidelines" for the practice.

https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/vehicle-code/veh-sect-21658-1/

graceful6800 6 hours ago|||
> Bizarre.

It's because they feel you're creating a dangerous situation for everyone around you for your own convenience and disregard for others.

ahf8Aithaex7Nai 1 hour ago||
Definitely not! They just don't want to let you have the advantage. "I have to wait here in my Ram Truck, so you'd better wait too and not cut in line!"
UncleEntity 6 hours ago||
I thought this was just a thing until I moved from Cal to Arizona and people would get really mad about it until I asked someone at work and learned it's illegal.
danans 7 hours ago||
> Electric motorcycles are on the way too, though the range isn’t there for my riding patterns yet. A small battery pack charged from French nuclear grid electricity would eventually make the per-kilometer carbon math very hard to beat.

I'd love an electric motorcycle to replace my previously owned motorcycle, though household rules say it can't happen until the kids are grown up, and for many of the same reasons as in TFA: environment, fun, etc.

One issue with electric motorcycles is that they are inherently disadvantaged by the fundamentally poor aerodynamics of motorcycles coupled with the fact that battery range doesn't scale down as well as it scales up - due to space constraints and fixed minimum weight overhead for inverters, etc.

This would be compounded because my use case would be longer distance pleasure rides, not daily commutes.

More comments...