It’s cleaner.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/lawyer-state-farm-f...
So no, I don’t know what they mean.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/appeals-court-warns...
It's everywhere and not hard to find if you make even the most modest effort.
Honestly, this word has lost all meaning, outside of perhaps “any use of AI”.
Well at least I know where team “lawslop” is coming from. Thanks, I guess?
People confuse slop with "bad", but slop isn't bad per se, it only becomes bad when real effort was required.
> broadly : a product of little or no value
> food waste (such as garbage) fed to animals
> excreted body waste
It's analogous to crypto. Started from some noble anti-authoritarian ideas and morphed into machine that removes any friction for capital - whoever has the most money will keep gaining the most.
Hence the crypto analogy - it was also supposed to "democratize", but the opposite happaned - it only further empowered the most powerful. Imagine legal case so purposefully complex that only those with access to best models have chances to participate and win the dispute.
I remember OpenAI was talking about sovereign AI models (OpenAI for Countries), it is time to train Astra India with Indian Constitution.
this vertigoruntime is brand new and his submissions absolutely dominate the front page recently https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=vertigoruntime
the about link https://vertigo.kuber.studio is obvious AI llm spam
What's interesting about that is while not everybody can train or run a model, anybody can build a harness. You and I can build harnesses.
It seems strange that OpenAI would move into a field where any developer can compete with them. I think that tells us a lot about the economics of training and selling inference.
Harnesses are going to be controlled at companies eventually, just like you might not have a choice of OS. They want to make sure they are the complete package.
followed a month later by
"Anthropic's Claude inadvertently repeals the 19th amendment"
This was already always the case. If anything, making this more accessible will reduce the barrier to entry for whether or not it's worth your time to take on a case. Instead of 50 lawyers spending 100s of hours on a case, you can have 1 or 2 lawyers + Astra working on it and if there's a case you can add more real lawyers.
1) Lawyers are not as naive as software engineers and will fight being replaces by new laws.
2) If they are replaced, OpenAI will take a cut commensurate with the amount in dispute (OAI, please credit me for the idea in the IPO brochure).
I am curious what level of trust established law firms treat LLMs with.