Top
Best
New

Posted by irs 1 hour ago

Show HN: gtlds.fyi – All the proposed new gTLDs(gtlds.fyi)
29 points | 32 comments
sixdimensional 8 minutes ago|
Does anyone know if subdomains on these gTLDs are required to be offered/sold publicly once acquired?

I don't understand how some of them can be granted to just one company when they are a "global" namespace, and then not allowed by the public to purchase or use.

I'm not talking about ones that are the name of a well known huge company that is unlikely to disappear.

ameliaquining 1 hour ago||
Suggestion: Allow the user to sort the list by number of applications.
skrtskrt 33 minutes ago||
More applications should mean they have to compete on price tbh.

Sure if AirBnb wants to administer .airbnb and charge a lot, whatever.

But `.bit` domains should be some bargain basement price if so many people want to run it.

input_sh 25 minutes ago||
That's exactly how it works. For example, Google's winning bid for .app ended up being $25m.
input_sh 43 minutes ago||
Top five: .agent (13 applicants), .bit (11), .hub (10), .brand (10), .api (10)
varun_ch 55 minutes ago||
so many TLDs that seem to be exploiting similarity to existing ones?

.cmo/.con are particularly egregious

sneak 4 minutes ago||
Yes, these should be banned.
sheept 20 minutes ago||
I wonder if xyz.com is simply requesting TLDs based on domains their users enter, so cmo and con come from their users’ typos rather than malicious intent. It would be similar to how some registrars park domains when a user checks if a domain is available.
JoshTriplett 17 minutes ago||
That would be an absurd amount of money to spend on typosquatting.
gregdotca 37 minutes ago||
Very nice! Some more sorting and filtering options would be handy, and some more view options, so each TLD doesn't take up half the screen when it has a lot of applicants.

PS - Your Source link is a 404.

irs 1 minute ago||
thanks. just added more views and filters now.
carefree-bob 2 minutes ago||
I don't want to see any new domains, we rely on the domain as a source of security -- I know, it sucks, but it's all we have, to look at that browser address bar and confirm it is really mybank.com that is asking for your login details, and each time someone adds a TLD, you have the risk of mybank.us, or mybank.info or mybank.bank confusing users. Enough already with the TLD.
skrtskrt 40 minutes ago||
I have been looking for an expansion of TLDs that are short, have a decent ring for self-hosting stuff, and don't sound too scammy.

Like `.link` is pretty cool but it's expensive because one of those personal-link-inbio companies created it and wants to cash in on it.

Just from scanning these, maybe:

* .air

* .bit

* .hub

* .iam

* .index (long but I love how universal it is)

* .lab

* .log

* .pod

* .port

* .self is really interesting, wonder if that would take off

* .sys

* .zen

yathern 42 minutes ago||
Very useful! I found this article a really good summary of the gtld situation:

https://www.wired.com/story/icann-top-level-domains-meow/

surround 22 minutes ago|
NSFW warning please. I clicked on this link while my screen was visible to to others and freaked out.
sneak 4 minutes ago||
The auctioning off of the GTLD space for private gain is one of the most egregious and offensive public-private wealth transfer grafts of our century.
bhaney 46 minutes ago||
> .lan

Don't you dare, Coffee Danger LLC

skrtskrt 34 minutes ago|
Seriously that is the sort of thing that could get you hunted down by angry nerds.

I am NOT going to use .home.arpa.

gelstudios 37 minutes ago|
i'd like to see this (filter / exclude) the dotBrand or brand-specific TLDs, as they are not open to the general public.

like .playstation or .airbnb or .nike

More comments...