Does it weight tokens on their ability to elicit negative emotions in users in order to drive engagement?

The Mishandling Personal Information benchmark is non-sensical: that's the very definition of giving your personal data to Meta

They added fancy annimations and effects to this specific webpage, which are unnecessary and distracting and lead to bad reading experience. I already suffer astigmatism and floaters. I hate it when I move my cursor and these gray blocks and characters flash and flicker.

    document.querySelectorAll("canvas").forEach(c=>c.style.opacity = 0)

While some are afraid that one rouge AI system may take over the world (or cause doom is some fashion), I think one of the best safety mechanisms to prevent this is having many competing and adversarial labs that are extremely close to each other. So it's good to see that Meta is not showing any intention of leaving the frontier.

I found it interesting in the example given of a user looking at house listings and the agent contacting the letting agent on it's own on behalf of the user.

Like the good ol' days of viruses and anti-viruses. I wonder if there's two sides that will play out; many agents across many users doing things at scale for their users, thereby creating an admin burden for someone else. However because the task is known there's a framework for how to solve the task, might Meta then provide an agent on the other side for the business owner to use.

It's interesting that in its marketing Meta compares Wonder to the closed frontier models but not the open (Chinese) models. By its own assessment, Meta could easily show how far ahead its own model is against the rest of the pack of open models but they chose not to. Why?

Looks good, and at least it is available unlike Gemini 4 Argon

The only time I'll ever touch a Meta LLM is if it's powering the dystopian doom bot that is plunging its murder spike through the base of my skull.

Acquihires starting to finally pay off it seems. Bring on the competition